I did say "slight".That’s some serious stretching there, Matt.
You may not be referring to the pic Andrew but certainly that is how I'd expect a panchromatic film to render the colours. I was puzzled about the behaviour of P30 in terms of what is the truth about how it renders colours and after recent posts I remain puzzledAnd in that example, it's behaving more like a pan film should.
You may not be referring to the pic Andrew but certainly that is how I'd expect a panchromatic film to render the colours. I was puzzled about the behaviour of P30 in terms of what is the truth about how it renders colours and after recent posts I remain puzzled
As I said Ferrania who brought this film back to life has to be in the best position to give us its findings. Maybe we will hear from them
pentaxuser
Yes that about sums it up in a sentenceFilm Ferrania are the only ones with the answer.
These two pics may help in this discussion. The B&W is P30 in D-76 straight. The color with a Leica M240.
And in that example, it's behaving more like a pan film should.
These two pics may help in this discussion. The B&W is P30 in D-76 straight. The color with a Leica M240.
I would generally agree. In fact it seems even more blue sensitive than ortho, with some bumps (perhaps in yellow but really hard to tell).
This might also explain why different people have reported materially different speeds for this crap film.
Ok that's funny.This might also explain why different people have reported materially different speeds for this crap film.
Well all this talk on P30 made me want to give it a shot again, as I only used the Alpha one, and I managed to snitch two rolls in the big city nearby. If this is marketing from Ferrania I guess it works
But I disagree that it is crap film - when I managed to get results, they were very good, with great contrast and fantastic midtones. I made enlagnements up to 30x40 and I could barely see the grain when focusing. It printed fantastic on Adox MCC. This is why I continued to tinker with it - but I was let down by the seemingly random results I got.
Has there been any news or rumors regarding progress on P30 in 120? I love the film and love Ferrania, despite their many flaws. I'm constantly fearing that they've given up or run out of money or something, but they are full of surprises and I'm sure we'll hear something from them eventually.
In Scott's article, he specifically does not try pyro. I'm attaching two pictures made on P30 and developed in 510-Pyro. The shot of the fence is actually taken with an original half-frame Olympus Pen, the other with a Vivitar Series One
In Scott's article, he specifically does not try pyro. I'm attaching two pictures made on P30 and developed in 510-Pyro. The shot of the fence is actually taken with an original half-frame Olympus Pen, the other with a Vivitar Series One 28mm f/1.9 on a Nikon FE2. The grain is very, very fine.
View attachment 198689 View attachment 198690
Hello, Kuortam. Since you asked within the discussion instead via PM (I'm glad I read this thread today), I'll put my notes here for you and any others who might be interested. In the old thread that you've included a link to in your post #943, the dead link was something posted by the Film Ferrania people, not me, so I don't have that dead link info. But if you want to know how I developed my P30 in 510 Pyro, here are my notes.
4 April 2018
Develop approx 24 exposures of new Ferrania P30 rated at ISO 80 with Olympus Pen (original) half frame then with Nikon FE2 w/ various lenses. Spectra-Combi incident metering for Olympus, in-camera metering for the FE2 for the most part. At home.
Develop in 510 Pyro at 22C, 3ml in 280ml water (I used a bit less water because i may have not gotten the full 3ml into the main mix). 12 min total, initial agitation for first 30 seconds, then point in the cardinal directions every 30 seconds until 9 minute mark, then invert every 30 sec to 12 minutes. Combina small 35mm tank.
Water stop bath, then PF TF-5 Fixer 6 minutes (10th use) constant agitation. Rinse, HCA for two minutes constant agitation. Running water 10-15 minutes. LFN and PhotoFlo in tap water, then hang to dry after see-sawing film through tank.
Results: If the initial scan of the negatives in sleeve is anything to go by, the exposures and development appears to be very good.
Hello, Kuortam. Since you asked within the discussion instead via PM (I'm glad I read this thread today), I'll put my notes here for you and any others who might be interested. In the old thread that you've included a link to in your post #943, the dead link was something posted by the Film Ferrania people, not me, so I don't have that dead link info. But if you want to know how I developed my P30 in 510 Pyro, here are my notes.
4 April 2018
Develop approx 24 exposures of new Ferrania P30 rated at ISO 80 with Olympus Pen (original) half frame then with Nikon FE2 w/ various lenses. Spectra-Combi incident metering for Olympus, in-camera metering for the FE2 for the most part. At home.
Develop in 510 Pyro at 22C, 3ml in 280ml water (I used a bit less water because i may have not gotten the full 3ml into the main mix). 12 min total, initial agitation for first 30 seconds, then point in the cardinal directions every 30 seconds until 9 minute mark, then invert every 30 sec to 12 minutes. Combina small 35mm tank.
Water stop bath, then PF TF-5 Fixer 6 minutes (10th use) constant agitation. Rinse, HCA for two minutes constant agitation. Running water 10-15 minutes. LFN and PhotoFlo in tap water, then hang to dry after see-sawing film through tank.
Results: If the initial scan of the negatives in sleeve is anything to go by, the exposures and development appears to be very good.
Hi Trask et al. - I settled for 11mn at 20C in 510 Pyro, fixed in TF-5 (near fresh) for 3.30 mn. Ilford agitation. 2ml of Ilfotol - looks decent on the Xpan! Scanned in Silverfast and levels corrected slightly. Thanks again for the advice.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?