Maybe the Portrait/Landscape/Fine Art people have a different outlook on hoods.?
I have to admit, i am a bit baffled at how you could associate those extremes with My Post.A hood can offer worthwhile protection from rain striking the lens. Particularly the long and deep hoods fitted to primes/telephoto lenses. There is nothing worse than having to constantly wipe a lens because of one's decision to forego a hood — for whatever reason, pedantic or practical. I suppose the next thing we'll hear complaints about is how much of a nuisance shoelaces and glasses are: laces come undone and trip us, glasses get knocked off, broken, or left behind... what next??
I have to admit, i am a bit baffled at how you could associate those extremes with My Post.
I merely gave my experience with hoods, and quite rightly pointed out that others may have a different need for them.
Watch those laces.
... Maybe theyre OK on a telephoto, but on a 50mm they sure seem mostly worthless to me. In a wide ange, they're downright silly.
What's the most gorgeous, useful, and rugged 35mm? The F2 or the Nikkormat?On this 28/3.5 and 35/2.8 they work really well - no vignetting and they do block stray light from the side.
View attachment 202499 View attachment 202500
On this 28-85 AIS, this hood (which is the recommended hood) vignettes badly at 28mm.
View attachment 202501
What's the most gorgeous, useful, and rugged 35mm? The F2 or the Nikkormat?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?