• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

EFKE Infrared 820c Test images

Boardwalk

A
Boardwalk

  • 2
  • 2
  • 25
Speculative Silence

D
Speculative Silence

  • 1
  • 0
  • 19

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
202,111
Messages
2,835,286
Members
101,122
Latest member
Nuggybro
Recent bookmarks
0

cmo

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
1,321
Format
35mm RF
A good laugh will warm you up :smile:

(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
 

DWThomas

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
4,623
Location
SE Pennsylvania
Format
Multi Format
By the way, did anyone here ever try the RG715 vs. the RG780? The latter probably creates a stronger IR effect and longer exposure times. As these filters are not exactly cheap I don't want to buy both to try on my own :whistling:

I've shot a 720 and a 760 with the EFKE film; it wanted maybe one more stop exposure with the 760. I assume the 780 would probably still be reasonably workable.

The actual filters were a Bower IR72 and a "Neewer" IR760 from the Far East, (both via ePrey) so I'm not sure how the filter specs and quality compare. The Bower in 77mm was $47 and the 760 was $14 for a 67mm, in case anyone wonders what drove the decisions. :D

I should comment though that with the Rollei IR400 film, should you wish to try that at some point, going from the 720 to the 760 added more like six stops -- one is very definitely working down the cutoff there.
 

cmo

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
1,321
Format
35mm RF
Thanks... apart from the 1 stop, what is the difference? I would expect a slightly stronger IR effect.
 

DWThomas

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
4,623
Location
SE Pennsylvania
Format
Multi Format
Thanks... apart from the 1 stop, what is the difference? I would expect a slightly stronger IR effect.

Yes, I would say a little stronger. It's funny, I spent several days working with both filters and both films, but moving to different locations trying to expedite a "project." I'm left feeling there were so many differences associated with time of day, lighting and the general scene that I don't feel I have a truly reliable A/B comparison. I have another project in mind for late spring that might allow doing some better comparisons. (Well, I get these crazy ideas .... :blink: )

I have a bunch of stuff on PBase that shows some results.
 

deandadin

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 10, 2005
Messages
2
Location
Santa Monica
Format
4x5 Format
Efke IR film details.

I am teaching an IR class. We are concentrating on digital IR and film IR. On saturday we covered film IR using the Efke IR B&W films. I used the regular and the Aura for the test. I did not find that much difference between the two films, they both worked equally well. I did not see much haloing with the Aura film. Initially I used an ASA of 25 to expose both rolls and I went through all of the shutter speeds at F 11 to see which one would give me the best exposure. This was just a test for the class. By the way I own a pro B&W lab in Culver City in California so I am very familiar with B&W processes. I used Tmax RS developer and I processed one roll for 8.5 minutes and the other for 11 minutes using a Jobo rotary processor. I shot the 120 version of the film. The first exposure on the film was at 30th of a second at F 11, indicated by the meter, and I went through all of the shutter speeds using a Mamiya RB 120 camera. The meter reading was under exposed and the exposure that had the best results was the exposure at 1/8th of a second at F11. This effectively showed that the correct asa for the film was really asa 6. The frame that was the good frame gave a superb IR photo and I will use that setting. Once again I found that the correct setting was at ASA 6 with a shutter speed of 1/8th of a second at f11 and the developer was TMX rs developer for 11 minutes. We did 2 rolls and developed them for 8.5 and 11 minutes but the one developed for 11 minutes gave a slightly better negative. I really love this film. It has a wonderful IR look and it comes the closest to the Kodak HIE film in IR. The film should be loaded in a darker area, total darkness is not necessary but it should be very subdued light. Well, thats it, I hope that this is a help. I will try to post some images when I have time. One other thing, I used the Hoya #R72 IR cutoff filter, lighter red filters dont work that well. I will also be using the Tiffen 87 cutoff filter in the future. There is also the B&W W093. The Tiffen is less expensive then the Hoya, the Hoya is around $240.00 for a 77mm size. The Tiffen is about $135.00 and they both do about the same thing. I have seen these filters on Ebay and you can check with KEH camera and see if they have them used also. Have fun shooting IR.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

deandadin

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 10, 2005
Messages
2
Location
Santa Monica
Format
4x5 Format
I use the Hoya 72 filter also. I did testing and I found that a good effective speed for this film is 6 with an exposure of 1/8th of a second at F11. I develop the film in TMX rs developer for About 10.5 minutes. I am using the 120 version with a Mamiya RB camera. I hope that this helps you.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom