Not sure how much you trimmed off when prepping for development but that looks like the amount of fogging that one would get with a Lloyd. A Watson or Alden 74 would be about twice that amount.I guess I'll have to remember that next time. Still, I thought it odd it would let me take that picture.
Was that 8 min at 75 deg in 1+1 ID11?I just developed the roll in ID-11 for 8 min at 75 degrees...look pretty good. However, I'm not sure what happened at the end. I had taken #23 and knew I had one left so advanced the lever-no resistance, took the picture and advanced again but it would only go about 1/8th the distance so, I knew that was it. I rewound and developed. That #24 shot was cut off by more than half. I'll try and take a pic of it before I cut the negatives after drying.
They look fine! Are you going to post some frames?Yes, 1:1
OK-I couldn't wait. This is what happened on shot #24. There should have been a complete negative.
_1DF4495 by David Fincher, on Flickr
Looking forward to it!Yep, soon as they dry.
This can happen when you use up too much of the leader when loading your camera. Commercial films allow for 3 frames wastage. Use more and the total number of exposures is effected. Something you need to test.
Film Photography Project probably used a bulk loader to manually load your cassette.I didn't roll this. It was bought direct in a cassette from Film Photography Project directly from Kodak.
I am looking forward to what you have Col. I have not used my 35mm Contax in years, just bought a bumper crop of the 5222 rolls, and am anxious to see results. I have read lots of seemingly (to me) conflicting info on the film - whether it has remjet or not, very low contrast meant for transfer to positive movie stock, but the data sheet seems to show normal, what D-96 is but it seems to be very similar to D-76 type, and the list goes on. I do not process roll film in my home so i will send to a lab. Choosing the one that uses XTOL and returns scan files. For now, the best i can do. So, i am hanging on, haven't sent my first two rolls out yet and eager to see some good stuff here.
Negs might be a bit hot; my chart says 7 minutes would be a good starting point @75.If you think this is high contrast you should see the same shots with Tri-X and HC-110 Dil H. Looking back over the negatives, I think they could stand a slight reduction in developing time...maybe half a minute or so. that could reduce the perceived contrast as well.
I like it. Think I'll order more and try some experimenting. It did very well with the shots taken in the shade but in the cross lit sun condition, maybe a touch contrasty. The lowered developing time would take care of that.
Anytime you photograph under different lighting conditions, it's always a compromise when it comes to development. All things considered, I think they turned out quite well!I agree. I think the next roll will be 7 minutes. 75 degrees is much easier to use here year around and that's what I've chosen over 68.
The shot of the two bears and the gas meter seem to be right on for 8 minutes with that flat lighting but too much for contrasty situations. It's difficult to use a "one time for all" on a roll of film with different lighting conditions. Still, not too bad for an unknown film for a first time development.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?