I also loved the Saunders easel, the Peak grain focuser, the glass negative carrier, and the dedicated Beseler enlarger stand / table. The Rodenstock 105mm f/5.6 Rodagon was the icing on the cake. The larger space didn't hurt either, and neither did the brighter safe lights. All of those are, technically, much better than what I am currently using.
A glass carrier sounds like a good toy though so I still want one.
It's a separate headache (4 more surfaces to get the dust off), but it's necessary for some film. I got Newton rings with the 6x9 one I had - made a nice pattern on the print - the back of the film was very glossy (don't recall what film it was).
The bottom glass isn't that necessary, is it? Two less glass surfaces to worry about.
The price difference between TOP gear and one that costs a fraction is huge. Capability of delivering high quality print is abut the same. Jobo processor will not deliver better results, even if it makes it easier (and often more cumbersome) to repeat and keep things consistent (if one pays enough attention what makes it so advantageous) but it will be a lot more expensive than a simple developing tank, of effectively same capabilities. Both requiring proper use to get good results.If you have installed the best available technology in your darkroom, then you will find: The limiting factor in producing prints is the photographer himself.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?