i know what you mean dan ..
have you ever seen the early work of andré kertész ?
i have this book of tiny contact prints made from some ww1 era folding camera ( i think?)
and they are stellar. i don't think the camera was on the same level as a hassle or leica ...
fetishes and magic bullets are nothing new
If only photography was a pursuit that could be solved by throwing money at it and buying a "better camera ". my work would be exhibited in the Worlds leading galleries, and I would be renowned wherever I went, sadly after spending a small fortune on cameras and lenses over the last fifty odd years, I now have top quality 35mm film S.L.R.s and lenses but can see no evidence that the work I'm producing is any better than it was thirty odd years ago, and my wife says I should have got a mistress instead and set her up in an apartment because it would have been cheaper
....
my wife says I should have got a mistress instead and set her up in an apartment because it would have been cheaper
20The VAT on photographic equipment must be really high.
As far as I know, it's 20 %, but she's not stupid Theo, she waited to tell me this until I'm too old to take her up on her offer.The VAT on photographic equipment must be really high.
Very good point. If it doesn't "feel right" holding it, viewing through it, if the balance is wrong, I find some cameras impossible to use. A lot depends on what you have become "used" to. For instance it took me a while to get used to holding a Hasselblad after using a Rollei......Regards!I've got a tradesman friend. I once quoted to him the proverb that "a good craftsman never blames his tools".
He was quick to reply, "Have you seen the quality of tools that good craftsman has?".
Like many others have said merely owning something doesn't make you any better, but often better photographers have good equipment.
Cameras are hammers to me. Many different brands and bits - but they either fit my hand well or not. What fits for me is different than what fits for someone else.
I love my ridiculously large Medium Format camera, tried a similar one that's better at toting into the field and have been unhappy with it. It has more glass, finders and less weight to get it there - is it a bad camera - heck no, just that it's a hammer that doesn't fit my hand well. In another persons hands it'd be the best camera in the world.
Actually, Carnegie is a rental hall. Anyone with the $$$ can rent it and have fun.If I own a Ferrari, does it mean I can win a Formula 1 race? If I own a Steinway, does it qualify me to solo at Carnegie Hall?
I just want people's opinions on this topic. I had always wondered if owning,what I would describe as a premium quality camera,would help me be a better photographer or are cameras like these considered a status symbol.?
Thanks,
Doug
Fine- if I own a period costume, does that qualify me to sing a leading role in La Traviata at La Scala?Actually, Carnegie is a rental hall. Anyone with the $$$ can rent it and have fun.
Fine- if I own a period costume, does that qualify me to sing a leading role in La Traviata at La Scala?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?