I've not used one, but the obvious answer is they could be less work (substituting money for time, etc.) I have been making my own with pretty good results, but not every one is a winner. I use the 'dimple-and-sand' method and try to work very slowly and carefully. Periodically during the process I examine the work for defects under a 50x handheld microscope I own from other activities many years ago. I usually start two or three while I have the stuff out, then pick the best one to install.I've been having fun with my DIY camera for a few months now and am wondering what your thoughts on the commercially available apertures out there. More control? Better results? What are your experiences?
I only used the pinholes made by Paul Koza at Munich University.Thry are excellent and very uniformbut then,unsharpness is one of the beauties of pinhole photography;so, I'm not necessarilly after perfection;Paul's product is getting close to a perfect pinhole though.I've been having fun with my DIY camera for a few months now and am wondering what your thoughts on the commercially available apertures out there. More control? Better results? What are your experiences?
laser holes made by "pinholebilly"
This sounds more fun. I've heard of people scanning their pinhole apertures at a certain known dpi and measuring them that way. This may be the route I take.Nice camera! Pity to spoil it with commercial lens!
I think it will be more satisfying making your own but using very thin brass shimming sheets (found in electric train hobby supply stores).
You could use a micrometer to measure needles to a bit undersize then pierce the metal with the needle in a pinvise.
Polish away the curled puncture with very fine emery and slowly enlarge till the right size hole is achieved.
A clean hole is important! You can blacken the finished hole on both sides of the sheet with gun blue or some say selenium toner or just permanent black marker felt pen.
The dimple pierce and polish is also okay but the former is faster.
Enjoy & would love to see some pics.
I recently made 26 pieces for the WWPHD over two evenings with the method above.
This sounds more fun. I've heard of people scanning their pinhole apertures at a certain known dpi and measuring them that way. This may be the route I take.
Thanks for the tip. I scan a lot of film on my Epson. I didn't even know I could set exposure levels till I looked just now.That is an effective way of measuring pinhole diameters. It also checks for some of the possible errors in making the pinhole. Be careful to use the minimum exposure necessary to get a good image of the pinhole when scanning. I prefer scanning the pinhole as a transparent film rather than a document, if possible. When scanning as a negative, overexposure can enlarge the apparent diameter of the pinhole.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |