DIY is one thing, but shouldn't we support professional repair technicians just as much - The Friday Post from Vienna

[Andreas Thaler]

To avoid overloading the forum as a frequent poster, I chose Fridays as the day for new topics - aside from repair projects. At the very least, I aim to post a new topic for reflection on the topic of repairs here every week

---

Today I’m asking myself and you, whether it wouldn’t make sense to do more for the preservation of SLRs, lenses, and accessories than just promoting DIY?

Doing your own maintenance and repairs isn’t an option for everyone who wants to get their equipment working again or have it overhauled.

That’s work handled by professional repair technicians, whose numbers are thankfully growing again.

This includes equipment that was previously considered uneconomical to maintain, such as electromechanical SLRs.

See, for example:

PPP Cameras

PPP Cameras Giving film cameras a new lease of life

pppcameras.co.uk

Home

Analog camera service from Slovenia

lzfotomehanika.odoo.com

MEGACAMERA

MEGACAMERA Landing Page

megacamera.carrd.co

---

Line of reasoning

I see it as the role of public relations - that is, communication - to raise awareness of this issue.

What we’re currently seeing in forums and on social media are two widespread attitudes that are taking a toll on the scarce resource of photographic equipment:

1. If something breaks, get rid of it and replace it with something that works.
2. Professional camera repair is often said to be uneconomical.

As a result, it is foreseeable that the supply of affordable, still-functional photographic equipment will become scarcer over time. New products are not currently on the horizon, even though open-source solutions are being discussed.

This weakens film and has consequences for film manufacturers, accessory suppliers, and everyone who wishes to continue working with film in the future.

What can help here is a new awareness of the scarcity of photographic equipment, which should be handled with care to secure the future of film.

Therefore, investing in professional service and repair by experts is a sound and sensible investment. That said, DIY always remains an option.

Do we need a large-scale, coordinated, expensive PR campaign to achieve this?

No, it’s enough to promote this mindset at every opportunity - in online discussions, face-to-face conversations, and by leading by example.

Because by doing so, we’re actually doing something to help preserve the limited supply of photography equipment and ensure affordable prices for professional services.

More demand, more supply, lower prices, or making a conscious investment in your own equipment to maintain its value.

This helps preserve film photography.

---

What do you think?

 

[Ulrich Drolshagen]

Up till now I had sent all my cameras, several Rolleiflexes, Olympus SLR and a Leica to professionals for repair or maintenance. The last one the Leica was half a year on holiday in England. It's not that there's an oversupply on repairsmen (and women). And a lot of them are going out of business due to their advanced age in the near future. Labor costs are a significant concern too.
I would never think about putting my hands on one of my cameras. They are too precious to me and some of them are expensive too. But for a young lady interested in film photography I got a little rangefinder camera from the 60s working again by replacing the light seals and soldering in a Schottky diode. That's my level of expertise in this sort of things and I would never think about sending in such camera for repair which I acquired for nearly nothing.
I think professionals are in high demand for preserving the high end part of the photographic heritage. The others will have to get cared for by skilled laypersons.
Getting spare parts is a serious issue BTW. For instance cds-LDR with a low resistance are not made anymore as it seems. This will make these little rangefinders of the late 60s and 70s unrepairable as far as they are strictly shutter priority automatic.

 

[Andreas Thaler]

Or do professional repair technicians not need any help, since they’re already working at full capacity?

In that case, more could be added.

But who will train them?

 

[BrianShaw]

There is a lot of thought packed into the reasoning; so much that I'm not too sure what to think. It seems that the remaining professional repair shops are not having difficulties getting customers. Recommending that folks use them is a good thing in the situations where that is the most appropriate option. Determining the best option, though, depends upon the motivation of the person requesting help and the motivation(s) of the people making suggestions. There is a lot of diversity of objective in both. I woiuld not even attempt to equate the topic at hand with impacts on film manufacturing or long-term changes in film camera usage, though.

 

[Andreas Thaler]

I woiuld not even attempt to equate the topic at hand with impacts on film manufacturing or long-term changes in film camera usage, though.

Why not?

 

[BrianShaw]

Why not?

Too indirect of an affect. Requires too many assumptions that can not be supported by objective evidence. e.g. One more repaired camera does not necessarily mean 1 more roll of film manufactured, purchased, used, or processed. All it means is that another camera is available for potential use.

 

[Andreas Thaler]

Too indirect of an affect. Requires too many assumptions that can not be supported by objective evidence.

An approach based on a hypothesis?

The fewer operational cameras there are, the less film is used.

I could feed that into the AI

 

[Andreas Thaler]

I could feed that into the AI

Finite equipment supply makes the shortage thesis valid, but the claim that higher demand lowers repair prices is economically flawed. Increased demand for labor-intensive, scarce skills will lead to higher premium pricing rather than a cheap mass market

Google Gemini

---

So we need to focus on training the next generation of technicians. Which brings me to my last question.

Because anyone joining the field today will have to teach themselves. I’m not aware of any formal training programs for camera technicians specializing in historical equipment.

 

[Andreas Thaler]

@BrianShaw

You're talking to me, Andreas from Vienna, not to Gemini

We can’t escape AI, but I think it can be put to good use.

But others feel the same way.

Here’s an excerpt from Austria’s most renowned daily newspaper:

Researchers dare not do without AI

A survey by the journal “Nature” shows that people are critical of AI research. Nevertheless, they feel compelled to use it

Forschende wagen nicht, auf KI zu verzichten

Eine Umfrage des Journals "Nature" zeigt, dass Menschen der Wissenschaft der KI kritisch gegenüberstehen. Zum Einsatz sehen sie sich dennoch gezwungen

www.derstandard.at

Unfortunately, however, AI does not solve the problem of a shortage of young camera technicians

OT OVER

 

[Andreas Thaler]

Even if we came up with the idea of creating a training program for camera technicians and were actually able to fund it, who would be there to train the people?

It would ultimately fail due to the age gap. The originally trained camera technicians—for example, those from NatCam—are either retired or no longer with us.

And anyone who runs their own workshop these days is unlikely to take on apprentices, except for their own needs—if they even have the resources to do so.

Now I, too, am starting to see things in a pessimistic light.

 

[lumoStoria]

Even if we came up with the idea of creating a training program for camera technicians and were actually able to fund it, who would be there to train the people?

It would ultimately fail due to the age gap. The originally trained camera technicians—for example, those from NatCam—are either retired or no longer with us.

And anyone who runs their own workshop these days is unlikely to take on apprentices, except for their own needs—if they even have the resources to do so.

Now I, too, am starting to see things in a pessimistic light.

My first question would be: In a world where job tasks involving manual labor disappear more and more (and AI/robotics will accelerate this process), why should young people decide to become a camera repair man/woman? It's one thing that we do this as a hobby whenever we like (and postpone/stop it if we don't). It's another thing to make a decision to repair cameras for the next 40+ years. I doubt that you would find many applicants considering the current situation on the labor market, the actual working conditions in repair shops, and the wages paid. Although I like repairing cameras now and again I would never try to do this as a profession. There are much easier, better paid jobs out there.

 

[Andreas Thaler]

My first question would be: In a world where job tasks involving manual labor disappear more and more (and AI/robotics will accelerate this process), why should young people decide to become a camera repair man/woman?

Because I don’t foresee a robot repairing our cameras anytime soon, and because craftsmanship is still seen as an antidote to job loss due to automation.

And because camera technician is such a rare profession, it thus offers plenty of opportunities.

And because, from what I’ve observed, young people want to step away from their virtual lives and do something „analog“. This group is also actively buying up old cameras and film.

 

[Ulrich Drolshagen]

Because anyone joining the field today will have to teach themselves. I’m not aware of any formal training programs for camera technicians specializing in historical equipment.

But a least in Germany there is a formal vocational training in mechatronics (if that may be the correct english term) and precision mechanics. I think these people could easily specialize in camera repair with a bit of training by a seasoned expert.

 

[lumoStoria]

Because I don’t foresee a robot repairing our cameras anytime soon, and because craftsmanship is still seen as an antidote to job loss due to automation.

And because camera technician is such a rare profession, it thus offers plenty of opportunities.

And because, from what I’ve observed, young people want to step away from their virtual lives and do something „analog“. This group is also actively buying up old cameras and film.

I know that robots will not repair our cameras but this is an argument from the demand side. Of course, it would be better for us if there would be a repair shop in any town (like there was a watchmaker in the old days). But just because there is a demand for something does not mean that there are enough people willing to satisfy this demand by comitting to the necessary professions. In Germany, bakers become scarce and a lot of traditional bakeries have to close because they do not find a successor and employees/trainees. Still, Germans like good bread and there is really a demand for it.

I know that there is an idea of the "analog life" out there: becoming a carpenter, moving to the countryside to grow your own crop, etc. Often, this is an idealization of the manual work and the "simple life". If confronted with the reality, most young people still decide to try to get an office job with regulated working hours, work/life balance, home office, "no dirty fingernails". I do not blame anyone for this decision since I decided the same way.

In my opinion, buying a film camera and taking analog photos has absolutely nothing to do with making life-long decisions on your profession,