Dish Soap

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
The active ingredient in Photo-Flo is a surfactant Triton X-100. This chemical does not readily mix with water and so Photo-Flo also contains a glycol to help getting the X-100 into water solution. Also present is an antifoaming agent to prevent bubbles. X-100 can also be mixed with isopropyl alcohol to make a highly concentrated wetting agent. Triton X-100 can be oblained from www.thechemistrystore.com and is quite reasonable so you can make swimming pools of Photo-Flo solution if you wish. A substtitute formula is in the archives.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Photo Flo 200 is TX-100 + Propylene Glycol. Photo Flo 600 is TX-100 + Ethylene Glycol. TX-100 is water soluble. Triton X 200 is insoluble in water and is a rare type of surfactant being both anionic and cationic. It is sold as a milky dispersion of the inner salt in water. I have bottles of both and have used them in making coatings.

PE
 

Christopher Walrath

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2005
Messages
7,175
Location
Milton, DE USA
Format
Analog
Didn't see this one earlier. Now y'all went and hacked Ron off.

As inexpensive as PhotoFlo is, why run the risk of staining/damaging film with dyed dish soap?
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Chris;

You are supposed to ANSWER this type of question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But it is a good question. One I keep asking myself too.

PE
 

michaelbsc

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2007
Messages
2,103
Location
South Caroli
Format
Multi Format

Has anyone ever used a whole bottle?
 

2F/2F

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
8,031
Location
Los Angeles,
Format
Multi Format
michaelbsc said:
Has anyone ever used a whole bottle?
Click to expand...

I have never used a whole bottle from beginning to end; I have spilled pretty much each one of them before finishing them. The exception is the one that I mixed 1:4 with water thinking it was HCA...until I started stirring and got huge suds. (I had my HCA stock in a similar bottle.) It's funny, because I cannot recall ever spilling any other chemical so badly, but it has happened about four times with Photo Flo.
 

yulia_s_rey

Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2011
Messages
256
Location
Madrid, Spain
Format
Multi Format
"Triton X" is possibly the coolest sounding chemical out there.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,339
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
michaelbsc said:
Has anyone ever used a whole bottle?
Click to expand...
Yes, but it took more than a decade. You can see it in this MSA submission I made 3.5 years ago (it is on top of the Kodacraft Roll Film Tank box).
 

Attachments

  • portals-apug-2007-12.jpg
    114.7 KB · Views: 115

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,047
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
michaelbsc said:
Has anyone ever used a whole bottle?
Click to expand...

I have a gallon bottle of Photo-flo 2100...might have bought it 8 or 10 years ago. It might last until I retire from the university darkroom. And since I have three 14-year-old boys and will be 61 when they graduate from High School and go to college, retirement will not be anytime soon...

I use 7oz of the 2100 to make a gallon -- then an ounce of that to make a gallon of working solution.

People keep dropping off bottles of Photo-flo 200...I got a mess of them..some with some pretty old labels. And a gallon bottle of Photo Flo 600 somewhere.

Vaughn
 

bblhed

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2010
Messages
600
Location
North Americ
Format
Multi Format
Vaughn said:
..................People keep dropping off bottles of Photo-flo 200...I got a mess of them..some with some pretty old labels. And a gallon bottle of Photo Flo 600 somewhere.

Vaughn
Click to expand...

Maybe you could pass some of that Photo-flo to some of the people that think they can use dish soap and save a few pennies.
 

Fanshaw

Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2004
Messages
62
Format
35mm RF
Christopher Walrath said:
Didn't see this one earlier. Now y'all went and hacked Ron off.

As inexpensive as PhotoFlo is, why run the risk of staining/damaging film with dyed dish soap?
Click to expand...

Because common sense suggests that there is no risk in view of the dilution used and it saves having to buy and store another bottle.
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,047
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
bblhed said:
Maybe you could pass some of that Photo-flo to some of the people that think they can use dish soap and save a few pennies.
Click to expand...

Actually, that is a nice idea. But the bottles do not belong to me, but to the university, so I can not take money for them. Next time at work (if I remember) I'll see what I actually have and perhaps work out some trades...rolls of 35mm or 120 film to give to the students or something.

Vaughn
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
I have about 1/2 gallon of PF-600 here somewhere that I could divide up and send out, but the cost of postage would be more than the stuff is worth.

PE
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,047
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
And if I remember a previous thread, you said the PF 600 is a bit more toxic than the PF 200 (and, I believe, the PF 2100).
 

lxdude

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
7,094
Location
Redlands, So
Format
Multi Format
Photo Engineer said:
I have about 1/2 gallon of PF-600 here somewhere that I could divide up and send out, but the cost of postage would be more than the stuff is worth.

PE
Click to expand...
Maybe you could use it to wash dishes.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Photo FLo 600 contains Ethylene Glycol and is quite toxic causing liver damage. Photo Flo 2100 contains Poly Ethylene Glycol and as such is less toxic but still not good. Photo Flo 200 contains Propylene Glycol and is quite a bit less toxic. PG has been approved in the dairy industry for refrigeration, it is considered so safe. The MSDS sheets and further information are on-line if you wish.

PE
 

guitstik

Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
1,095
Location
Eads TN.
Format
Multi Format
I don't know about that Ron. The EPA has just listed milk as a hazardous material, now anyone that handles it must be trained in hazardous waste response, dairies must pay for the local fire dept to have a response and clean up team and truck drivers must have a Haz Mat endorsement.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Oh, that is due to the Photo Flo content of milk, I'm sure .

Back in the olden times, it was lead contamination. You see, states mowed grass along the interstates and sold the grass clippings to dairy farms. The lead in gas at that time contaminated milk and led to lead poisoning in some states. There was quite a scandal that led to conversion to lead free gasoline.

PE
 

ags2mikon

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2009
Messages
603
Location
New Mexico
Format
Multi Format
I just bought PF's Form A Flo and looking at the MSDS it does not list the type of surfactant used. Is it ionic or non-ionic? Thanks everybody.
 

gdavisloop

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2023
Messages
4
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Medium Format
Photoflo is cheap per-use, but the initial cost is more than developer! So I ask again: if you don't need archival results, and you don't mind lemon-scented negatives, wouldn't a drop of "Ajax" in a quart of water suffice as a wetting agent?
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,409
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
gdavisloop said:
Photoflo is cheap per-use, but the initial cost is more than developer! So I ask again: if you don't need archival results, and you don't mind lemon-scented negatives, wouldn't a drop of "Ajax" in a quart of water suffice as a wetting agent?
Click to expand...

My guess is black and white negatives are resistant to dish soap. Whether it would work properly is anyone's guess. Surfactants can reduce froth or increase. Everything from foam insulation to anti-gas antacids.

I use Photoflo.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,339
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
The gunk they add to dish soap is likely to increase the amount of unwanted residue on your negatives.
You want them to dry clean!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…