• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Differences between Tmax 400 and Tri-x characteristic curves?

Alan Edward Klein

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
10,258
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
Getting into your heart and using it to express yourself is a lot more difficult to learn.
 

Lachlan Young

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
5,122
Location
Glasgow
Format
Multi Format

Do get hold of Richard J Henry's 'Controls in Black and White Photography' if you can - it shows the level of knowledge, ability and kit needed to properly test emulsions in a consequential and absolutely comparable manner - and just how far short of this most of these 'tests' online & elsewhere fall. Going beyond Henry's level of work would require the sort of equipment usually only found in manufacturers' R&D/ QC labs.
 

markaudacity

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
184
Location
Houston TX USA
Format
Med. Format RF
So far, I've shot Tri-x, developed in Rodinal, Tmax 100 and 400 in HC-110. Tmax 100 is too grainless for my taste. I like some grain. Tmax 100 is almost like shooting digital. That's not the look I'm after.
Give the Tmax a shot in Rodinal. It has a bite that digital never achieves. It might still not be to your taste five years later, but smooth film in gritty developer isn’t something I often see recommended, and I like to bring it up whenever possible.
I always shied away from Rodinal because of the grain, but I’ve really liked the sharpness it gives, and with smooth tab-grain films like Tmax or Delta I find it restores some of that “film” look that’s lost in something like, say, DD-X.