• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Delta 400, the bastard stepchild?

Latest Gallery

100 years ...

A
100 years ...

  • 0
  • 0
  • 19
Synchronized pool cleaners

A
Synchronized pool cleaners

  • 0
  • 0
  • 43

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
202,991
Messages
2,848,502
Members
101,586
Latest member
subicrn
Recent bookmarks
1
Richard S. (rich815)

Richard S. (rich815)

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
4,924
Location
San Francisco
Format
Multi Format
Everyone frequently talks of the old favorites Tri-X and HP5+, and there's a decent amount of discussion around Tmax 400 but relatively speaking seems few use or talk of Delta 400 much. Is it the least favorite of the "professional" 400 speed films? Even less forgiving than Tmax 400? Tough to get it dialed in?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Coarser than TMY2 is IMHO the main drawback and also I suspect it may not push as well as the other three 400s. It'd be nice to have it in sheets as competition/backup for tmax though; I'll be pretty pissed if Kodak stops making TMY2 and I can't get fast sheet film that isn't made of sandpaper. Maybe the disappearance of TMY2 is a necessary commercial precondition to coating D400 on thick base?
 
polyglot said:
Coarser than TMY2 is IMHO the main drawback and also I suspect it may not push as well as the other three 400s. It'd be nice to have it in sheets as competition/backup for tmax though; I'll be pretty pissed if Kodak stops making TMY2 and I can't get fast sheet film that isn't made of sandpaper. Maybe the disappearance of TMY2 is a necessary commercial precondition to coating D400 on thick base?
Click to expand...

I would agree with your suspicion, if TMY-2 goes away, ilford will probably make Delta400 available in sheet.
 
Not sure, A few years ago Simon Galley responded to request about Delta 400 in sheets and I believe it was a no because they felt it would compete with HP5+ and therefore could jeopardize the existence of HP5+
 
I settled on Delta 400 for a 'fast' film in 120 size. After Neopan 400 was discontinued, I tried Tri-X (again), HP5, TXMax 400, and Delta 400.

First, I have to say so people can stop reading right now- I develop and then scan and photoshop, which many here consider not real photography. So be it.

Anyway, I found that Delta 400 with a light green filter (for me this is important- I don't like the look without it), developed in HC-110 (1:50, 12 min) gave me the look I wanted. A bit more grain than TMax 400, a nice grain that reminded me of Tri-X in D-76 1:1 30 years ago. Nice tonality, etc. And it seems very forgiving. Even gross overexposures retain detail. It works for me. And with what is going on with film makers, I figure that Ilford is going to be the last one standing so I might as well dial it in now.

Well, it's all personal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It is all personal. It's a favorite of a buddy of mine, but I prefer TMY. I remember when it seemed there was nothing but hate for Tmax. Hard to believe Ilford makes 5 different 400 speed films.
I'll have to try that light green filter trick with delta 400 sometime.
 
I don't know what you guys are talking about, Delta 400 is gorgeous, easy to use, pushes real well, and is quite forgiving.
 
I've used a lot of tmy2 and txp, and a fair bit of hp5 (although I haven't shot enough to really pick the differences... yet). I love Delta100 and 3200. But for some reason I've just never tried Delta400, it's just never in whatever shop/website I'm at when I'm buying.
 
When I have a choice and need 400 it is first cept if there is something cheaper like Kentmere or Forma or expired, expired is my fave.
Don't know why the tabulars have not killed the conventional.
 
I used quite a lot of 120 Delta 400 and I get excellent results. I hadn't used HP5 for manyn years but began using it again for hand held 5x4 work 6 years ago and the results are outstanding.

Poor availability meant I'd had to switch away from Tmax100 & 400 (I couldn't get it easily in Turkey/South America) but I've not regretted the switch.

Ian
 
Delta 400 is not my favourite ISO 400 film by a long way, but I am sure it has it's followers. It isn't available in LF sheets either.
I do have a high regard for Delta 100 though.
Personally, I much prefer HP5 Plus and TMY2 to Delta 400.
 
I have to say it is one thread title that I could'nt miss.....!

DELTA 400 is a deeply loved and cared for child, one of our 400 iso family that we adore.

Simon ( Dad ) ILFORD Photo / HARMAN technology Limited
 
Yes, another vote for Delta 400. In DDX works well for me. I haven't got the years of experience of others, but very satisfied with the results.
 
erikg said:
Hard to believe Ilford makes 5 different 400 speed films.
Click to expand...

Um, they do? Delta 400 and HP5+ and...?

I like Delta 400 but I use mostly conventional B&W in rolls, tabular in sheets where I can control development individually, and it is no longer available in sheets. I have a nearly full box of 4x5 that has been frozen since the 90s but haven't tried it since to see how it's fared. Given the speed I suspect not so well.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Well not ILFORD but HARMAN make : XP2 Super / PAN 400 / KENTMERE 400 / DELTA 400 / HP5+

And Darren....consider yourself adopted !

Simon ILFORD Photo / HARMAN tcehnology Limited :
 
Ah yes - I shouldn't have forgotten XP2 Super. I was the one over on LFPF saying if you made it in sheets I'd order C41 chems for the Jobo the next day. It's a wonderful film.

And I wasn't thinking about non-Ilford branded but Harman coated products as "Ilford made" though I suppose the distinction is academic.
 
Delta 400 developed in stock ID11 is my film of choice.
 
Simon R Galley said:
Well not ILFORD but HARMAN make : XP2 Super / PAN 400 / KENTMERE 400 / DELTA 400 / HP5+

And Darren....consider yourself adopted !

Simon ILFORD Photo / HARMAN tcehnology Limited :
Click to expand...

Thanks Simon, I should have been more precise. I've used all five and I think it great to have such good choices.
 
Delta 400 with a personal EI of 200 developed in Barry Thornton's two-bath has been my sole combination for the past 12 years. This combination meets all of my needs. However, in my opinion, the make of film/developer combination that a photographer chooses is not that important. Far more important is sticking to a chosen combination so that you can get on making photographs and gain an in-depth knowledge as to how your chosen tools react over a wide variety of situations.

Bests,

David
www.dsallen.de
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:
Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom