I would say your best bet is DD-X but D-76 will work just more grain.
Either way be sure to develop an additional stop longer than recommended (I would recommend) and also, I've discovered that if you're shooting only 1600 or 3200, using HP5+ would give finer grained results and really great shadow detail.
HP5+ @3200 in DD-X for 20 minutes is MAGIC!
I would say your best bet is DD-X but D-76 will work just more grain.
Either way be sure to develop an additional stop longer than recommended (I would recommend) and also, I've discovered that if you're shooting only 1600 or 3200, using HP5+ would give finer grained results and really great shadow detail.
HP5+ @3200 in DD-X for 20 minutes is MAGIC!
Are you happy with the results?
Beat me to the question.
I'd add "were the negatives easy to use?"
If it is working there's no reason to adjust.
I was shocked the first time I printed a 35mm Tri-X negative and saw how different the grain appeared than in the scan. Essentially it appeared smaller and much less obvious. I suspect a similar thing would happen when printing these "superpeed" films. Now I'm eager to give it a try.
Delta 3200 doesn't have to be grainy, and just to be perverse it can even come out quite nicely from a bath in Diafine:
Chris
If you don't like grain you could try Delta 400 at 1600.
If you don't like grain or shadow detail, you could try Delta 400 at 1600.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?