RattyMouse
Allowing Ads
If you're shooting it around 1000-1600 D-76 (ID-11) works great! If you want to push it to 3200 I'd go with something like DD-x, microphen, or Tmax.
No one has the right answer to this.
Some truth there, when in doubt though or when first trying this film (any film) the manufacturer's instructions are a darn good bet.
Some truth there, when in doubt though or when first trying this film (any film) the manufacturer's instructions are a darn good bet.
Except with Delta 3200 and ddx where most people recommend developing one stop over the ilford times. (Shoot at 1600 develop for 3200, etc) I'm not sure if they feel this way for other developers with delta 3200.
I've become an addict of d3200 and ddx
At least for Delta 3200 in DDX I would still say "most" as almost every thread I find on it has someone flat out stating that Ilford's times are just wrong.
Though I think you're right and I personally doubt Ilford got it wrong, they just have different idea than some people on what they want to get out of the negative.
I was reading the archives here for info on developing Delta 3200 from Ilford in D76. There seems to be wildly divergent views on this so I'm guessing that this is not a preferred developer for this film. Anyone disagree and use D76 often with this film?
I am a fan of D76, but is such a fast film really necessary?
I am a fan of D76, but is such a fast film really necessary?
You tell me. My camera's maximum aperture is f/4.5. How are you going to capture this scene?
More exposure time.
More exposure time.
So fast films ARE necessary.
I am a fan of D76, but is such a fast film really necessary?
Yes.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?