It was perfectly acceptable to get some women drunk, take her home and "had a good time", but that doesn't mean it is right.
It was perfectly acceptable to put Japanese Americans in camps, that doesn't mean it is right.
It was perfectly acceptable to call me "Chinaman" a few decades ago, but that doesn't mean it is right.
It was perfectly acceptable to have John Wayne to act as Genghis Kahn, but that doesn't make it right.
It was also OK to flog the enslaved, made kids work in factories.... etc.
Mistreating women has always been wrong....
So, unless you have some decisive, first-hand information to share, I don't see how your opinion matters to us.
Yes. Obviously.
EDIT:
and what about mistreating men?...
You know we've taken a wrong turn tangent when we're bringing John Wayne in for arguments sake.
Looks like you are blind... Let me explain to you the difference: I am not implying anything about DAH, either for or against. This is not an opinion. This is a fact.You do realize that you did exactly what you've chastised others for, correct? Offered an opinion without any firsthand knowledge.
That is the same as saying 'All Lives Matter' when confronted with concern over the death of a person of color.
Looks like you are blind... Let me explain to you the difference: I am not implying anything about DAH, either for or against. This is not an opinion. This is a fact.
Like the phrase "All Lives Matter", which has definite racist connotations, your comment has definite misogynistic connotations attached to it. As I have written in this thread earlier, the problem of racism is when it is used by those in power to harm others. Disrespect for women, including misogyny, is not a problem unless the person is in a position of power. DAH was in a position of power and used that power to sexually harrass women. Americans have the right to be racist, and the right to be a misogynist. But like the right to swings one's arm ends at the tip of someone else's nose, so does the right to express or act upon ones disrespect for women in a way that harms women.yes, and.... ???
I propose to rename Photrio. "Pillory" is more appropriate.
And what is amazing, it is all voluntary!
I love it. We debate as if it will change the photographic world. At times we are lizards bragging that our predecessor were dinosaurs, while our successors carry on the torches of photography...digitally or otherwise.Maybe it's just severe boredom or monotony today.
....
The words, "It was perfectly acceptable to get some women drunk, take her home and "had a good time", but that doesn't mean it is right." is not an "extreme" example as you put forth and very much the issue here.
When John Wayne got stomach cancer, he stopped making war movies in which he charged up on the beach because he did not have the guts for it.
No problem...cool. You made me think, which I always appreciate.Ah, I confess I only skimmed the article linked in the OP. I must have missed that detail. If that is what he is accused of then I have been positing nuanced non-sense. Please accept my humble apologies.
Ah, I confess I only skimmed the article linked in the OP. I must have missed that detail. If that is what he is accused of then I have been positing nuanced non-sense. Please accept my humble apologies.
Hi Brad, as a person who really admires DAH's work, and have taken his workshop, the episode really pains me. The allegations are very bad. I don't think your and my opinions are too far apart, once details are known. At least I don't think you are a troll, and very much willing to discuss things with you.
Be well.
THE HELL HE WAS!
He had most of his digestive organs removed to fight the cancer, that is why he did not have the guts to make war movies.
I had a friend who installed the mirrors in his house, I'm tellin' ya.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?