• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Costs

Surprise

A
Surprise

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
102391040027-2.jpg

A
102391040027-2.jpg

  • 6
  • 4
  • 97

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
201,783
Messages
2,830,044
Members
100,943
Latest member
Ag_Dad_Bot
Recent bookmarks
0
OP
OP

rrusso

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Messages
229
Location
Illinois
Format
Multi Format
I've shot a lot of Kentmere 100 developed in Rodinal. It's a great film and at one time it could be bought for $2.95 a 36 exposure roll...about the same price as bulk loading Fp4 per roll. It seems prices jumped up for Ilford products and Kentmere was not spared but it's still cheaper then its counterparts.

Hi All,

Personally, I think a roll of film today is a bargain. Kentmere in bulk rolls is a steal. IMO, there has never been a better time to shoot b&w film and I'm enjoying it!

Neal Wydra

Oh yeah I love Kentmere (prefer it over anything Kodak offers), definitely a steal by comparison. Just using the B & H prices, 100ft rolls of Kentmere 100 and 400 work out to be roughly 2.39 and 2.21 per roll, respectively.

Ain't gonna get much better than that.
 

John Wiegerink

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
4,032
Location
Lake Station, MI
Format
Multi Format
I've heard the Ultrafine line was plagued with QC issues some time ago. Perhaps they fixed these issues?
Wow! Raised from the dead thread. The "BAD" film was rebranded Shanghai 120 film that had terrible number-offset bleed from the backing paper and emulsion defects of fungi type growth. I believe this film is long gone. All the Ultrafine Xtreme films are near perfect or at least they have been for me anyway.
 

mklw1954

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Messages
397
Location
Monroe, NY
Format
Medium Format
I've used the Ultrafine Xtreme films for 4 years and never had a quality problem. They used to have a Pro line which I thought was poor quaity based on one roll of 120-100 (I don't think they sell the Pro films anymore).
 

mklw1954

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Messages
397
Location
Monroe, NY
Format
Medium Format
I've heard the Ultrafine line was plagued with QC issues some time ago. Perhaps they fixed these issues?

I've used the Ultrafine Xtreme films for 4 years and never had a quality problem. They used to have a Pro line which I thought was poor quality based on one roll of 120-100. I don't think they sell the Pro films anymore.
 

Arklatexian

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 28, 2014
Messages
1,777
Location
Shreveport,
Format
Multi Format
Hi All,

Personally, I think a roll of film today is a bargain. Kentmere in bulk rolls is a steal. IMO, there has never been a better time to shoot b&w film and I'm enjoying it!

Neal Wydra

Neal, I really think you are right. While I am certainly not rich. Probably less so than most in APUG, I have always found that bulk film was valuable as a convenience, not so much as a money saver. With bulk, as has been mentioned before, if I want or need some 10 or 15 exposure rolls I have them and as I remember and once used 20 exp. factory rolls (not 24), I have them too. You won't find me scrapping my Leica film cartridges, no way......Regards!
 

Nodda Duma

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 22, 2013
Messages
2,686
Location
Batesville, Arkansas
Format
Multi Format
Hey guys,

Chiming in.. Kentmere..? I've heard good thing about that film. Does it produce a nice image?

Todd
Been using Kentmere for several years and yes it does. Good contrast and easy to print from.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom