Concentrated long lasting paper developer formula

ruilourosa

Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2003
Messages
797
Location
Portugal
Format
Multi Format
Hello
Does anyone know any formula of this type?
With the qualities around dektol or ilford multigrade...

Thanks!!!
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

ruilourosa

Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2003
Messages
797
Location
Portugal
Format
Multi Format
I would much prefer a known formula as i have acess to raw chemistry and cost os also an issue...
 
OP
OP

ruilourosa

Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2003
Messages
797
Location
Portugal
Format
Multi Format
in id-62 type developer could i substitute potassium carbonate (more soluble but more expensive) for some some sodium carbonate plus hidroxide?
This without altering stock and tray longevity and activity?
 

KPA40

Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
30
Location
Germany
Format
35mm
I would try the standard sodium carbonate version first to see if the developer suits you. I have always used it up within four months (stored in high-filled ½ litre bottles). If all works well, you can always use the more concentrated form next time.
If you do want to buy a ready-made developer, I would recommend ADOX Adotol-Konstant, which is known for its durability.
Moreover, it is very cheap

https://www.fotoimpex.com/chemistry/adox-adotol-konstant-paper-developer-to-mix-5000-ml.html

Olaf
 
OP
OP

ruilourosa

Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2003
Messages
797
Location
Portugal
Format
Multi Format
Id 62 is very long lasting as is d-72 but i would really like to have a long lasting concentrated Dev... 1+9 would bem great!
 
Joined
Jul 28, 2016
Messages
2,770
Location
India
Format
Multi Format
in id-62 type developer could i substitute potassium carbonate (more soluble but more expensive) for some some sodium carbonate plus hidroxide?
This without altering stock and tray longevity and activity?

You can turn ID-62 into a two part formula easily where the first part is glycol based and the second part is mixed as per need. No need for any Potassium salts. First part contains only Phenidone and Hydroquinone and is long lasting.
 

markbau

Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Messages
867
Location
Australia
Format
Analog
I find Ansco 130 to be very long lasting, I often use it over two print sessions. It is every bit as good as D 72/Dektol. A word of warning though, Glycin seems to go off quicker than most chemicals, I keep it in the fridge. Unless buying it from the Formulary you never know how long it has sat around.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

ruilourosa

Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2003
Messages
797
Location
Portugal
Format
Multi Format
You can turn ID-62 into a two part formula easily where the first part is glycol based and the second part is mixed as per need. No need for any Potassium salts. First part contains only Phenidone and Hydroquinone and is long lasting.

Not very convenient... Its for school use and i want to mimic the convenience of 1+9 and economy...
 
OP
OP

ruilourosa

Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2003
Messages
797
Location
Portugal
Format
Multi Format
There is... Id 62 could go into solution more concentrated to be diluted 1+9 but using potassium carbonate and hidroxide because sodium carbonate is not so soluble... Im trying to use sodium carbonate not potassium...
 

john_s

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
2,147
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
Medium Format
ID-78 can be made 3x standard strength using potassium carbonate instead of sodium carbonate without any other changes such as Ian Grant's use of sodium hydroxide to replace some carbonate. So normal working solution is now 1+5. I use Dimezone-S which might make dissolution easier.

It's supposed to be a warm tone developer but the effect is extremely subtle.

Ian Grant has a mod that would give you 1+9. See http://www.lostlabours.co.uk/photography/formulae/formulae.htm
 

john_s

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
2,147
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
Medium Format
You could use sodium carbonate and still do some modification using hydroxide as in Ian Grant's formula. You might get to 1+6 (guess) or better.
 

Alan Johnson

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
3,284
There is... Id 62 could go into solution more concentrated to be diluted 1+9 but using potassium carbonate and hidroxide because sodium carbonate is not so soluble... Im trying to use sodium carbonate not potassium...
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/source/hsdb/5018#section=Solubility-(Complete

If you don't mind a few crystals when it cools down, note that the part B of Pyrocat HD can be 200g/L sodium carbonate:
https://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/PCat/PCat2/pcat2.html
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

ruilourosa

Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2003
Messages
797
Location
Portugal
Format
Multi Format
200g/liter of sodium carbonate could be put into solution in id 62 or another developer?
What about a fully soluble amount of sodium carbonate plus some amount of hidroxide?
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,658
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
Joined
Jul 6, 2008
Messages
181
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
As others have commented, the Ilford series of published formulas are probably as good as you can get, and have been time-tested by users across the board. ID-78 is an excellent neutral tone developer. In patents, I've come across various modifications, but they start involving compounds like diethylene glycol, etc.
If you want a 1+9 concentrate, it's hard to avoid using potassium salts. I don't think I've ever seen a concentrate for 10x and higher dilutions that uses sodium salts. Many even specify potassium sulfite, whereas Ian Grant's adaptation achieves it using Na2SO3.
Potassium carbonate is not that much more expensive. Considering that a kilogram of it is enough for maybe 50-60 L of working dilution developer, I don't think you should try to avoid it.

Edit: I looked up the formula for ID-78. Increasing the concentration of ingredients 2.5x will give you the 1+9 concentrate. This means you need 155g/L Na2CO3. Perhaps this will actually dissolve OK, but I have never tried this. Ian's formula calls for about 100g/L K2CO3. So a kilo will make 10L of 1+9 concentrate.
 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…