Color vs Black and White, the eternal debate

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,128
Messages
2,786,625
Members
99,819
Latest member
stammu
Recent bookmarks
1
Status
Not open for further replies.

baachitraka

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
3,565
Location
Bremen, Germany.
Format
Multi Format
colour = full colour (what ever that means)

color = missing one hue.

*I know, I am wasting everyone's time
 
OP
OP

nikos79

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2025
Messages
614
Location
Lausanne
Format
35mm
colour = full colour (what ever that means)

color = missing one hue.

*I know, I am wasting everyone's time

In ancient Greek it was χρώμα (chroma)
It is very interesting that ancient Greeks were almost blind to pale blue or green. Many theories have emerged about it. Perhaps I have inherited that too 😆

Also in Homer and other works the sea was never being described as blue. Many other colors that i think go mostly towards black but never blue
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,843
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
I have no idea what that means

Someone could very easily and at any time go take a thousand digital photos that are only about colour. I just used my phone to take this:

1754904464621.png


The next step in the argument will be to say, "That's not a photograph."
 
OP
OP

nikos79

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2025
Messages
614
Location
Lausanne
Format
35mm
Someone could very easily and at any time go take a thousand digital photos that are only about colour. I just used my phone to take this:

View attachment 405061

The next step in the argument will be to say, "That's not a photograph."

No-one said it is not a photograph.
I can also post my chest x-ray image too, that is a photo as well.
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,843
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
I can also post my chest x-ray image too, that is a photo as well.

It is. But I get the distinct feeling that you would not have much to say about a photo unless it was a photo of something (where you could actually just talk about that something).
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
23,310
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
It is very interesting that ancient Greeks were almost blind to pale blue or green.

Nonsense. You're confusing the linguistic identification hues with the ability to discern them biologically/physically. On both topics lits of research has been done, but they're distinct topics. You can't drive a physical ability or lack thereof from a linguistic artifact.
 

baachitraka

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
3,565
Location
Bremen, Germany.
Format
Multi Format
politeness is missing few hues :-(
 
OP
OP

nikos79

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2025
Messages
614
Location
Lausanne
Format
35mm
Nonsense. You're confusing the linguistic identification hues with the ability to discern them biologically/physically. On both topics lits of research has been done, but they're distinct topics. You can't drive a physical ability or lack thereof from a linguistic artifact.

Yes of course, human biology hasn't changed in the past 10 thousand years, but the linguistically perception might also affect the way we perceive art.
I think colour in Ancient Greece was mostly about intensity and texture and less about hue, that is why the sky is bronze and eyes bright and sea turbulent wine red
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,000
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
It is very interesting that ancient Greeks were almost blind to pale blue or green.

Interesting. Can you give the source or sources of this apparent fact. So were the whole race of ancient Greeks blind to pale blue or green? Assuming modern Greeks are not afflicted by this flaw was this a gradual change and if so, from when( what date) is it agreed that Greeks were free of the flaw?

Thanks

pentaxuser
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
23,310
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Yes of course, human biology hasn't changed in the past 10 thousand years, but the linguistically perception might also affect the way we perceive art.
Now you make this about something else than your initial statement. Exchanges with you seem to follow this pattern a lot. You say something, someone suggests it's not accurate, so you say they're right and change the topic to something related. It's a bit like wrestling an eel.
 
OP
OP

nikos79

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2025
Messages
614
Location
Lausanne
Format
35mm
Now you make this about something else than your initial statement. Exchanges with you seem to follow this pattern a lot. You say something, someone suggests it's not accurate, so you say they're right and change the topic to something related. It's a bit like wrestling an eel.

I think this is normal progress of conversation, I say something perhaps a bit exaggerated, you question it, I check my sources, reformulate and come back with a more accurate statement

P.S. I laughed a lot with the eel analogy :smile:
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

nikos79

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2025
Messages
614
Location
Lausanne
Format
35mm
Interesting. Can you give the source or sources of this apparent fact. So were the whole race of ancient Greeks blind to pale blue or green? Assuming modern Greeks are not afflicted by this flaw was this a gradual change and if so, from when( what date) is it agreed that Greeks were free of the flaw?

Thanks

pentaxuser

I will give some sources yes but colour blind was a bit figuratively speaking. Here is some sources. although very off topic:






The Ancient Greeks Were Almost Blind to Blue and Green

There is a possibility that the ancients, by their very nature — purely at the level of the retina — saw fewer colors than our eyes see today, to the point that one could even speak of a “Greek blindness.”

“How differently from us the Greeks must have seen nature, since we can hardly deny that they were almost blind to blue and green — seeing instead of the first a darker brown, and instead of the second a yellow. (Thus they used the same word, for example, to describe the color of chestnut hair, the centaury flower, and the southern sea; and with the same word, the color of lush green plants and human skin, of honey and yellow resin.)

According to the evidence, then, their greatest painters depicted their world using only black, white, red, and yellow. How different — and how much closer to humankind — nature must have seemed to them, since in their eyes human colors dominated even in nature, so that nature seemed to swim, one might say, in the multicolored ether of humanity!”

Thus mused Friedrich Nietzsche, in aphorism 426 of The Dawn, on the peculiar color sense of the Ancient Greeks.

Goethe, in his Theory of Colours, had already noted that the Greek vocabulary for colors is unusual, outside any rule, and is as different from ours as their language was.

Color combinations so improbable that some 18th- and 19th-century scholars claimed the Greeks could not see colors. They could — and well, in fact — but described them differently: surely the human eye is always the same and will remain so.

For the Greeks, colors were above all life and light: a wholly human experience, not a natural, optical one, having nothing to do with the color spectrum of the prism, as defined by Isaac Newton.

Homer, in the Iliad and the Odyssey, names only four colors: the white of milk, the purple-red of blood, the black of the sea, and the yellow-green of honey and fields.

“Black” (melan) and “white” (leukon) meant darkness and light (the Latin word lux, “light,” has the same etymology as the Greek leukos). And according to the Greeks, it was precisely from the mixture of light and shadow that colors were created.

The Greek word xanthos indicates a color ranging from yellow to red and green — perhaps what we might call “copper-green.” Its shade is the warm tone of ripe wheat, but also of the blond hair of Homeric heroes, up to the reddish, warm light of fire glowing at night or the orange of the round sun at sunset.

The adjective porphyreos means “dark,” “in constant motion,” “troubled,” until it comes to mean the purple color that, from the red of blood, extends to blue; porphyreus is one who collects murex shells, from which skilled dyers produced the dye of the same name.

The adjective kyaneos, “cyan,” refers to a blue color so general and vague that it could range from sky blue to dark red and even to the black of death.

Also, my favorite color, glaukos, first of all means “bright, gleaming, flooded with light,” used to describe the sparkling sea. The eyes of Athena are glaukopis — “bright like an owl’s” — with a bluish, azure, grey-blue hue.

William Gladstone, the distinguished English Homerist and politician, was among the first to insist on the luminous impression of Greek colors.

Indeed, in past centuries, when similar linguistic peculiarities in color terms were noted among other peoples — even in the Bible — a heated academic debate arose over whether the ancients, by their very nature, saw fewer colors at the retinal level than our eyes do, to the point that one could speak of Greek color blindness.

Darwin’s theories first, and later studies in physiology and medicine, proved beyond doubt the opposite: the Greeks saw the sea, the fields, the sky, and landscapes in the same colors we see today — or perhaps in more beautiful colors, because they felt the need to express them in a different, personal way.

In the end, the Ancient Greeks gave each color a different meaning in terms of brightness and purity. They saw the light and painted its intensity: thus the sky is bronze-like, vast and star-lit, never just blue; and eyes are glaukos, sparkling, never just blue or grey.
 
OP
OP

nikos79

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2025
Messages
614
Location
Lausanne
Format
35mm
It is. But I get the distinct feeling that you would not have much to say about a photo unless it was a photo of something (where you could actually just talk about that something).

No not really. A photo about something would work well if it wouldn't talk about the same something but about something else.
 
OP
OP

nikos79

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2025
Messages
614
Location
Lausanne
Format
35mm
I think we have very different perceptions of normal conversation patterns.

Well ideally I should have been more careful, cross-check all my facts, do some rigorous research, and be adamant about my opinions but I neither post to a scientific magazine nor write my crystallised views on photography.

We engage into an informal social forum and my views are still fluid
 
  • koraks
  • koraks
  • Deleted
  • Reason: Better in private

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,000
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
nikos79, thanks for the extensive reply but I think that the conversation between you and koraks really covered the reality of the Greek colour blindness - at least to my satisfaction

Oh and this quote from your reply sums it up very well: "Darwin’s theories first, and later studies in physiology and medicine, proved beyond doubt the opposite: the Greeks saw the sea, the fields, the sky, and landscapes in the same colours we see today

pentaxuser
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
23,310
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
the extensive reply
I'd like to remark that such an extensive reply takes about 10 seconds to come up with a suitable prompt and another 10 seconds for ChatGPT to produce the output. We are then left with the mission (if we want to take it on) to weed out the hallucinations from the possibly valuable stuff and to produce robust interpretations of the actual sources used that we'll first have to identify properly (as opposed to the vague hand-waving in certain directions as featured in the AI output) so we may form an informed opinion of the subject matter.

Sorry, I can't and won't sugarcoat this. I'm perfectly fine with someone's knowledge being limited( we're all human - or...are we, I start to wonder), people being wrong much of the time, in part or entirely (and I'm no exception) or our abilities to express ourselves in a common language being limited. One of the basic requirements for a conversation to work, however, remains the notion that someone at least acknowledges that they said what they in fact said. It doesn't matter if that was wrong or debatable - we can talk about it. But there's no talking if the meaning behind the words we use is withdrawn the moment they've been uttered.
 
OP
OP

nikos79

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2025
Messages
614
Location
Lausanne
Format
35mm
I'd like to remark that such an extensive reply takes about 10 seconds to come up with a suitable prompt and another 10 seconds for ChatGPT to produce the output. We are then left with the mission (if we want to take it on) to weed out the hallucinations from the possibly valuable stuff and to produce robust interpretations of the actual sources used that we'll first have to identify properly (as opposed to the vague hand-waving in certain directions as featured in the AI output) so we may form an informed opinion of the subject matter.

Sorry, I can't and won't sugarcoat this. I'm perfectly fine with someone's knowledge being limited( we're all human - or...are we, I start to wonder), people being wrong much of the time, in part or entirely (and I'm no exception) or our abilities to express ourselves in a common language being limited. One of the basic requirements for a conversation to work, however, remains the notion that someone at least acknowledges that they said what they in fact said. It doesn't matter if that was wrong or debatable - we can talk about it. But there's no talking if the meaning behind the words we use is withdrawn the moment they've been uttered.

This was not an AI output but the translation of the following article i have read:


@pentaxuser asked for my sources what should I have done give him a Greek text and let him get puzzled?
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,116
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
Well now I might go even further with an even more absurd personal opinion and you might not like it at all:

If the colour is indeed the actual content of the image then the image is weak imho
I agree with your point.

If any object, weather condition, color, texture, or whatever is the the only content of an image, then the image is going to be lacking. If the image can not contain the artist and the viewer, than the image will be weak.

Milpool...I like that image -- but it could be argued that the content is not color, but the use and impact of color.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

nikos79

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2025
Messages
614
Location
Lausanne
Format
35mm
This was not an AI output but the translation of the following article i have read:


@pentaxuser asked for my sources what should I have done give him a Greek text and let him get puzzled?

Exact source is the following book;
Marcolongo Andrea «The wonderful language»

The article was a passage from that book
 
OP
OP

nikos79

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2025
Messages
614
Location
Lausanne
Format
35mm
I agree with your point.

If any object, weather condition, color, texture, or whatever is the the only content of an image, then the image is going to be lacking. If the image can not contain the artist and the viewer, than the image will be weak.

Finally someone gets it! Thank you!
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
14,036
Format
8x10 Format
The Brits sometimes spell it "colour"; Americans spell it "color". Too bad the English have such a hard time learning proper English.

To make things even more confusing, realize that the term "tone" has a completely different connotation in color theory and practice than it does in black and white photographic jargon; and even there it carries dissimilar meanings.

To tone something in relation to color paint, for example, is to add white to it. Likewise, in analytic color mapping, tone is the axis of lightening things toward white, or with white, while tint is the opposite axis darkening it toward black. Color and hue saturation per se is is expressed differently in relation to chroma (I guess the Brits would spell that as "chrouma" if they could get away with it).

In b&w photog, "tone" might be expressed in relation to gray scale density, or it might alternately imply toning a print after development for sake of a certain hue or density shift.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom