Color vs Black and White, the eternal debate

[MattKing]

This would be really boring without the colour:

Year End

• MattKing
• Dec 31, 2017
• 8

Forest floor foliage, at the end of the year.
At the side of the path, near the pitch and put...

But I don't think it is "about" colour.
Rather, it is dependent on colour to communicate what it represents.
And it was certainly the colour that attracted me to it, and it is the colour that makes me happy to share it.
Returning, as I'm fond of doing, to a musical analogy, music without rhythm, or tonal range, or harmony, or vibrato or a myriad of other things may still be music, but without the "colour" that those various characteristics add, it isn't normally very successful.

 

[chuckroast]

William Eggleston, Untitled (Greenwood, Mississippi), 1973.

Is this about a lamp? About the ceiling? About a lamp on the ceiling? About a red ceiling? About a lamp on a red ceiling? About the colour red? About a photograph of the colour red? About bad taste? About nothing other than the fact that it existed? Is the blood-like red a metaphor? What's interesting about it, the fact that there is (was) a lamp and wires on a ceiling that someone decided to paint a bloody red, that it's a photograph of a lamp and wires on a ceiling that is painted a bloody red, or that William Eggleston thought it interesting to take a photograph of a lamp and wires on a ceiling that is painted a bloody red?

The difficulty is always figuring out what it's about, if, indeed, it's about anything.

Looks more like an accidental shot when loading the camera ...

 

[Brendan Quirk]

If this picture was in black and white, I don't think anyone would pay much attention to it. Indeed, it's a good example of a photo that's " all about color. "

I like it in B/W.

 

[GregY]

If this picture was in black and white, I don't think anyone would pay much attention to it. Indeed, it's a good example of a photo that's " all about color. "

Not much to pay attention to in colour.... it's just red.

 

[DREW WILEY]

Not exactly. The colors would have been smacked you in the face in fashion of an actual dye transfer print. The brass trim would look gold, and the purple tinge of the lightbulb would comprise an annoying counterpoint to the dominant red. I'm not saying I like the image. But Eggleston is making a cultural statement in line with a broader portfolio. All those insanely rigged extension cords, ripe for burning down some poverty stricken neighborhood dive, or whatever. The garish color makes it sinister. Black and white, it's just graphic, and clumsily so. He knew what he was doing, whether you're an Eggleston fan or not.

 

[Alex Benjamin]

Not exactly. The colors would have been smacked you in the face in fashion of an actual dye transfer print. The brass trim would look gold, and the purple tinge of the lightbulb would comprise an annoying counterpoint to the dominant red. I'm not saying I like the image. But Eggleston is making a cultural statement in line with a broader portfolio. All those insanely rigged extension cords, ripe for burning down some poverty stricken neighborhood dive, or whatever. The garish color makes it sinister. Black and white, it's just graphic, and clumsily so. He knew what he was doing, whether you're an Eggleston fan or not.

All this.

 

[GregY]

All this.

or none of this...... how much /how little baggage does an image carry?

 

[DREW WILEY]

The color is not meant to be pretty, but provocative. A lot of shots Eggleston took of the South had a sinister feel.

 

[Alex Benjamin]

how much /how little baggage does an image carry?

A thousand words?

 

[BrianShaw]

The color is not meant to be pretty, but provocative. A lot of shots Eggleston took of the South had a sinister feel.

It certainly provokes me!

 

[Vaughn]

...


The poster is suggestive

Shows the image is not solely about color...the human element is strong in this one...as is red.

B&W as an abstraction....IMO, more of a subtraction than an abstraction. A removal of a layer of information, showing that less can be more.

 

[Craig]

I think there is an implied assumption here that photographs = art.

However, there are many other reasons to take a photograph, such as documentary photography, where the intention is to document something as accurately as possible. In that case, the world has colour, so only a colour photograph can truly document what is present.

I know people who take photographs of trains and everything related - stations, servicing facilities etc, for the purposes of making models later. The photos are intended to be a "slice of time". Only colour works, since the exact shade of weathered paint on a locomotive at a particular date is important. The photos have no pretension of being art, the purpose is strictly to record something at a particular time.

Even if we consider "art", if you're taking photos of the leaves changing on the trees in the fall, or flowers; photos of a stand of red maple trees looks boring in B&W, the whole scene would be about the colours of nature.

 

[dcy]

Personally, I believe a good photograph is mainly about the form and composition and will be good in both black and white and color.

I couldn't disagree more. What got me interested in B&W in the first place was the fact that you see different things and a boring color photo can be really interesting in B&W and vice versa.

Agreed Drew. Absolutely an artificial debate....not really eternal....

Artificial indeed. I've been scratching my head over this thread. I shoot both color and B&W. Heck, sometimes even take pictures with my phone.

I shoot color and B&W for different reasons. I like the DIY aspect of B&W and I like that I notice the light and "texture" more than when I shoot color. I like to shoot color when I see lovely colors.

 

[BMbikerider]

It is not the one vs the other. It is more a question of whether they are equivalent or if not whether they need a different approach.

Before I took up colour printing in the early 1990's I I remember I used to 'think in B&W'. I could visualise tones and how they would appear (especially Infra red) but I seemingly lost the ability when I started in colour work and never managed to gain it back. Consequently I now think my B&W images are more difficult to get looking right than colour.

 

[snusmumriken]

It certainly provokes me!

Surely the whole thing about Eggleston is that he photographed the mundane and/or unattractive precisely because it isn’t meaningless? I imagine what attracted him about that scene - as part of a wider portfolio, as @DREW WILEY says - was both the colour and the wiring. Without the colour it arguably doesn’t have enough content to make the grade, and also wouldn’t match his other work.

 

[snusmumriken]

B&W as an abstraction....IMO, more of a subtraction than an abstraction. A removal of a layer of information, showing that less can be more.

I like this.

 

[George Mann]

I like it in B/W.

View attachment 404457

Have you figured it out yet?

 

[George Mann]

A lot of shots Eggleston took of the South had a sinister feel.

You had to know the man to understand him.