A long time ago now, but when printing
Ilfochrome Classic prints at ChromaColour in South Australia,
Certificate of Authenticity was provided with each bespoke print, enumerated by the photographer (title, edition, file number) and signed by them, and not with an AutoPen!) These Certificates were the preserve of the production manager, the printer and the photographer, nobody else. They are not the things one keeps in an electronic archive, nor searchable, just a solid, verifiable accompaniment to a print, a reassurance to the purchaser (from the lab/production facility that the 'chromes are the real deal.
If you are not producing works of high value and skill, like Tim Rudman's, a
Certificate of Authenticity is not going to give you star power.
There is still debate whether a CofA provides any additional monetary value over and above the print it accompanies.
Which is easier to fake, a print or a certificate of authenticity?
Both. I have seen faked
Ilfochrome Classic prints about 30 years ago, described as "quality Cibas" but found to be RA4 prints on high-gloss material! Anybody can dream up a
Certificate of Authenticity and big-note themselves that such a scrap of card with a gold-embossed logo will add thousands of dollars to a mediocre print. My own Ilfochromes were accompanied by a
Certificate of Authenticity — there are likely still a few stashed away accompanying matted/wrapped IC prints.