Wrong answer, most likely.
I think it is asking if CatLABS currently can participate and post to Photrio. So the answer probably is, “yes, dear, it can and has.”
Perhaps an underlying question is what restrictions are associated with “restricted access” status.
Would anyone have bought this film if they knew it was rebranded Agfa Aviphot 200?
Please have a look at the other thread, where the thread opener has done exactly that.
I looked and did not see it. What page where he has examples of the same subject shot at ISO 200, and at ISO 60 (?) and developed accordingly so we can compare the two images?
I looked and did not see it.
what the restriction was?
Ok, here's a point for discussion...
In post #1, it is stated that this film was "four years in the making"....
Four years ago, The UK was in the EU, correct?
The 'confectioning' is clearly Harman...
Ok, here's a point for discussion...
In post #1, it is stated that this film was "four years in the making"....
Four years ago, The UK was in the EU, correct?
The 'confectioning' is clearly Harman...
Four years ago CatLABS was rebranding Kodak 5222 in 35mm and Shanghai GP3 in 120. Of course, it may have taken them four years to shift over to rebranding Agfa Aviphot 200. But as I mentioned above, you can't believe everything you read, so that "Four years in the making..." stuff could just be, uh, marketing. And the less said about the remainder of that sentence the better."Fours years in the making".....could be. Time needed for financing the purchase and converting of the film. And then the pandemic happened: Ilford closed down their factory for some time. And after that they had problems to fulfill all orders because of the increased demand. Lots of backorders, needed time to work that out.
Of course in such a situation your own products have 100% priority. And other very small potential customers have to wait.
Four years ago CatLABS was rebranding Kodak 5222 in 35mm and Shanghai GP3 in 120. Of course, it may have taken them four years to shift over to rebranding Agfa Aviphot 200. But as I mentioned above, you can't believe everything you read, so that "Four years in the making..." stuff could just be, uh, marketing. And the less said about the remainder of that sentence the better.
So Agfa Aviphot Pan 200 remains as the only possible film stock used for the CatLabs rebranding.
You’re kidding, I hope.
In my opinion, it's those who've acted important and entitled, not Omer, who ought be embarrassed by their posts in this (and other) threads.
Not easy to find. On page 3, post 57, OldWino posted negs at various ISO speeds. On about page 5, post 120, Alex Benjamin posted a series of near identical pics of a patio deck at various speeds. I didn’t look past that for other examples.
Unless CatLabs has arranged for some slightly modified film to be manufactured for them by Agfa.
Unlikely as I'm told that Agfa coats vast quantities which last for years. But not impossible. The only way CatLabs statements could be true is if they've ordered something custom made from Agfa.
I suppose Harman could be persuaded to custom coat something different to their current products, but it would surely be beyond CatLabs means.
In my opinion, it's those who've acted important and entitled, not Omer, who ought be embarrassed by their posts in this (and other) threads.
I wonder if this thread outlasts the supply of this film?
Weil, isn’t it entitlement and self importance telling others that they are such if not being a moderator?
I looked at the outline of the ISO testing for speed determination. Specifically it's for Still Camera films, not aerial, graphics, radiology etc films. So ......
Clearly this works fine for some folks.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?