CatLABS X FILM 320 Pro now available in 35mm and 120

brbo

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
2,103
Location
EU
Format
Multi Format
I see that Photrio is basically a meme out there (how the f*** did I end up on Photrio?!), so no wonder that Catlabs is here just to troll...

But, some mentioned other sources of information (reddit, YouTube, Facebook?) that are presumably much better. So, if we take this example of new Catlabs 320 Pro film, what valuable information you people got on these channels? I guess at least correct development time for Jobo in D76 1+1?

Right?
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,682
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
Just realized that I bought the wrong film, found what I was though the new film at PhotoWearhouse, nope got the repackaged Kodak Double X. Need to reorder.
 

brbo

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
2,103
Location
EU
Format
Multi Format
No such thing as wrong film. Just give it a stop more light. Or less. Or two.
 

faberryman

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
6,048
Location
Wherever
Format
Multi Format
CatLABS has started up a thread about its new film on RFF. It's a cut and paste from the original post here. Perhaps additional information will emerge.

CatLABS X FILM 320 Pro now available in 35mm and 120 - Rangefinderforum.com

4 years in the making, this film is an all new BW emulsion with a unique grain and tonal range, unlike anything you have seen before. This is a unique emulsion, not available from another maker in another packaging. Made with the highest quality control, this film is on par with other major film...
www.rangefinderforum.com
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,525
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Oh that should be interesting… are they as curmudgeonly as here or not…
 
OP
OP

CatLABS

Member
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
1,576
Location
MA, USA
Format
Large Format

Curious that one should be so enthralled to get "additional information" for something they declare they do not want to buy in the first place because "reasons". Just sayin....
 

faberryman

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
6,048
Location
Wherever
Format
Multi Format
BrianShaw said:
Oh that should be interesting… are they as curmudgeonly as here or not…
Click to expand...

The discussions are usually about cameras and lenses. Not too many discussion about darkroom matters like developing film.
 
  • BrianShaw
  • Deleted
  • Reason: irellevant

faberryman

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
6,048
Location
Wherever
Format
Multi Format
BrianShaw said:
.... and wrist straps. Jokingly mocking wrist straps led to my demise there. Sad when a bit of light-hearted teasing raises the ire of the mod to the point of a lifetime ban. I don't think I've even looked at that site for a decade or so.
Click to expand...

I think there have been a couple of extended camera strap threads as well. I don't have much to say on the subject, because I am not trying to match a strap to the exotic leather on my limited edition Leica. The discussions initiated by Bill Pierce are generally above average though.
 
Last edited:

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,906
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Don Heisz said:
Why not buy it?
Click to expand...

MattKing said:
Because my film buying dollars are finite, and ISO compliance helps me decide whether or not to use a film, and helps me start out with it.
The examples say "under-exposed" to me.
Click to expand...

pentaxuser said:
I thought Matt King was responding to a specific question you had asked and had given you his reasons for not buying it

pentaxuser
Click to expand...
Yep.
Most of the comments here are about how the film is being marketed, and how CatLabs is participating here. Seems to be a fair subject for discussion, particularly given that CatLabs started the thread.
Many of the participants in the discussion would have concerns addressed with some answers to fairly reasonable questions - like how light sensitive the film actually is. Last time I checked there were some reasonably common and well understood ways to clearly communicate that. A label that says "EI ISO 320" isn't one of those.

And by the way, I did indicate in post 186 the factors that could cause me to consider buying some film when I posted:
"It might be fun to play around with a ~50 ISO film with intriguing spectral sensitivity, rather than a more predictable 400 ISO film." Since then, I've had some second thoughts about one detail. The 50 is probably a Zone System EI, so the ISO for the film should be closer to 80.
I'm unlikely to actually buy it though, as the cost for this Canadian to buy and have shipped a single 35mm roll would be about $43.00 CDN - the exchange rate and the costs of shipping make it impractical.
 

faberryman

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
6,048
Location
Wherever
Format
Multi Format
CatLABS said:
Curious that one should be so enthralled to get "additional information" for something they declare they do not want to buy in the first place because "reasons". Just sayin....
Click to expand...

Keep digging. The hole is only getting deeper. Just sayin...
 

faberryman

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
6,048
Location
Wherever
Format
Multi Format
The first response to CatLABS new thread on RFF is pretty hilarious:

"Are you the same Omer that is active in the CatLabs thread on Photrio?"

Get your popcorn out.
 
Last edited:

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,525
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
MattKing said:
Last time I checked there were some reasonably common and well understood ways to clearly communicate that. A label that says "EI ISO 320" isn't one of those.
Click to expand...
So now you have my curiosity piqued. What do you think the box/label should read in this instance?
 

Sal Santamaura

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
7,530
Location
San Clemente, California
Format
Multi Format
mshchem said:
I wonder if more than 50 people have looked at this thread???...
Click to expand...

According to the Industry News thread listing, it's had 410 replies (this one will increment that to 411) and 9,000 views in its entertaining three week existence. I've counted 48 unique members who "contributed" those replies. If each of them clicked on it 187 times, which is not unreasonable given its value as comedy, there's the 9,000.

Omer's firm has 8,928 followers on Instagram, with 865 of them following at this moment. If one is interested in knowing about effective film marketing in 2022, look to social media, not PHOTRIO.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,682
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
Agree, most of the younger film photogpghers do not use Phototrio, social influencers' have a much larger impact than what is said or not said here.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,906
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
BrianShaw said:
So now you have my curiosity piqued. What do you think the box/label should read in this instance?
Click to expand...

Not ISO, if there isn't an ISO speed available.
And not a phrase with a 320 in it, if the suggestions for use are to use an EI of 200.
You could have a phrase that says: "set the ISO dial on your meter to 200", but I acknowledge that that is unwieldy.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,906
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Paul Howell said:
Agree, most of the younger film photogpghers do not use Phototrio, social influencers' have a much larger impact than what is said or not said here.
Click to expand...

Most don't use forums. But that isn't the same as saying that forums don't have their place.
 

faberryman

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
6,048
Location
Wherever
Format
Multi Format
CatLABS' thread on RFF has been deleted. I don't know if CatLABS deleted it, or if a moderator deleted it because it was deemed advertising.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,525
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format

Okay, I see where you’re coming from. I don’t see that any different from HP5+ being rated at ISO 400 yet many Photrio members recommend shooting at 200… and do so every time. Different strokes for different folks depending on individual circumstances.

But I really think, read that KNOW, that your putting a bit too much assumption on the use is “ISO” in speed labeling. It has become a bit like using “Kleenex” as a generic for any bathroom tissue.

Sure, they could have labeled it “EI 320” or “EI200” but in the real world what difference would that make?

As I wrote earlier, unless there is a clear and concise statement of compliance or conformance there is just an assumption. Maybe there is compliance/conformance but there’s no way to know for sure. I’m also recalling a past discussion of Kodak certified thermometers where no amount of searching or collective wisdom could verify any “certification”. Great thermometers nonetheless but from an evidentiary perspective that fact is inconclusive marketing verbiage. We both may agree that it’s likely yet can’t verify. Hmmm.

Regarding your personal situation… I’m okay with whatever you do or don’t do. I understand.
 
Last edited:

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,644
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format

Thanks for the analysis!! I think personally I might be up to 900. I close out of Photrio and then keep coming back and hitting this thread.

As long as I stay off of Ebay! This here is good fun!!
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,738
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF

I think you're fanning a fire that shouldn't be lit.

But who cares, anyway? It's just a company providing film to a dying market.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,525
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
faberryman said:
I am open to any explanation you may have to offer.
Click to expand...

I have nothing to offer as alternatives. Why would I… I was uninvited to that party more than a decade ago. LOL But it is a bit surprising that a potentially applicable thread mysteriously disappeared. I’m really perplexed about film photographers who have bemoaned the demise of film for years and then crucify attempts to support film photography. I can’t explain that either. Can you?
 
Last edited:

warden

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
3,037
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Medium Format
Sal Santamaura said:
Omer's firm has 8,928 followers on Instagram, with 865 of them following at this moment. If one is interested in knowing about effective film marketing in 2022, look to social media, not PHOTRIO.
Click to expand...
I think a fair number of people here are also active on the other social media outlets, including myself on Facebook, Instagram, and Discord. So you're counting a lot of people twice or three times. It's not a binary thing; people on Photrio know how to use the internet too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…