Hearing the T90 firing again was a delight, but I had forgotten how noisy that thing is compared to even a Canon F1.
As I said on another thread, I finally pulled the trigger on a "for parts / as-is" T90 with the "EEE/Help" error, hoping that the issue it has makes it complementary of mine.
I received it today, and it's, cosmetically speaking, close to a beater when mine is pristine (the difference being that mine has been unused for 20+ years since it's not working and I chose to move to the EOS3 at this time).
Functionally, I had the good surprise that it fires sometimes (I thing I've got a few hundred shots in a raw before the "EEE" came again), so I guess I may change my plans from using it as a donor to using "mine" (the historical one) as a donor for the cosmetic parts. My reasoning is that there's a risk that, if I can transplant the mirror magnets on mine, I may well discover it has also the shutter issue.
Hearing the T90 firing again was a delight, but I had forgotten how noisy that thing is compared to even a Canon F1.
I am on the lookout for a scrap T90.
I want to get the faulty electromagnet out of it and see exactly what the problem is.
We all know the workaround, using a magnetised screwdriver, which works for a while,
so is it as simple as either remagnetising or demagnetising it,
or maybe demagnetising the keep?
Alas even scrappers listed on ebay for far more than they are worth, so so far,
I have not been able to get one for an autopsy.
Hey, it's pretty quiet compared to a Hasselblad!
Congrats on your T90. I hope you can get it to work reliably and have some fun with it.
I was once asked to stop taking pics of a dance performance because my F-1N ae was so loud on manual.
We were in the first row and the long walk to the office was quite the embarrassment to my date, who remained in her seat, I wasn't bothered, having been told shooting during a live performance, which i had never done before, and the woman in the office, whose two troops i had been shooting for a few years, was the one that said it would be OK, now embarrassed too.
I believe the only reason we were not told to leave was for the above connection and permissions.
Alexander Godunov, was not amused.
If the T-90 is louder than the F-1, in any issue, it must have contributed to its nickname, "The Tank"
In my case the magnetised screwdriver did not do the trick. I paid 44€ for this camera, including postage, and I think it's hard to get any lower, at least nowadays in France.I am on the lookout for a scrap T90.
I want to get the faulty electromagnet out of it and see exactly what the problem is.
We all know the workaround, using a magnetised screwdriver, which works for a while,
so is it as simple as either remagnetising or demagnetising it,
or maybe demagnetising the keep?
Alas even scrappers listed on ebay for far more than they are worth, so so far,
I have not been able to get one for an autopsy.
If you manage to solve the EEE/HELP problem, i.e. presumably activate the blocking shutter magnets, we would have solved all of the lady's old age problems!
Canon T90: recommendations and notes
Based on my previous (repair) experiences with the Canon T90 with regard to preservation/problems/repair options, I would like to give a summary of the following recommendations/hints: Sticky shutter - gummed-up shutter blades: Can be permanently repaired, damper in the shutter area that has...www.photrio.com
It has a reason, why rangefinders are used for such scenarios. It was what I did for many years, e.g. at chamber concerts (without amplification). But there was every time an entire bunch with clack-clack-clack DSLRs.
In the 90s, when I was a young guy, a woman invited me to Paris. Was a nice trip, but when I first photographed her with my Praktica 5B she burst out in laughter and ridiculed me of having such a shitty camera. (She had some digital soapbox.) I heard from others before that the Praktica is loud and kicks like a mule, but never believed it, I only knew the Praktica and had nothing to compare. I was happy with it. Years later, when GAS got me, I learned to know other cameras.
My T90 also had the EE fault. Put it on the heating for half an hour, than it kicked back to life. Trained the shutter and some oil spilled out onto the blades, that i wiped. Works since then.
Hi, for what I understand at the moment, the core is a permanent magnet, and I suppose the current in the solenoid cancels this field for a moment, hence releasing the mirror.
No current flow through the coil, no magnetic field that separates the armature from the permanent magnet.
Would you have a chance to measure the resistance of the coil on one of your T90s ? 2 ohm difference seems too low to make a big impact but who knows?
Would you have a chance to measure the resistance of the coil on one of your T90s ? 2 ohm difference seems too low to make a big impact but who knows?
Too bad! I tried searching on the Net but found nothing for the moment.
I plan on putting the supposedly defective magnet on the donor camera, to check what happens. I'll post results obviously.
Would be nice to be able to re-wind these magnets!
I still have three T90s with affixed red dots (i.e. corpses
I use one of them to remove the magnetic switch under the mirror and measure the coil.
I'll report tomorrow
66.5 ohm for one, the one which had the blinking arrow issue, 68.7 for the other.
Measuring the coil on the magnetic switch under the mirror box on my Canon T90 gives ~ 65 ohms.
Measuring conditions:
- The magnetic switch is measured when installed.
- I use measuring needle tips that pierce the insulation of the supply conductor (orange) and return conductor (black).
- To create a closed measuring circuit, I cut the leading conductor.
- The approx. 2 cm cable length each from the two measuring points at the start and end of the coil winding should not add any relevant resistance value.
@Laurent
Is this value plausible for you?
That would constitute less than 5% difference in magnetic field strength, assuming that the measurement is actually reliable. Differences n contact resistance at the measurement points could explain the entire difference easily. I don't think the difference in resistance is a factor in the problem.
The direction of demagnetization of either of the permanent magnets involved seems more promising to me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?