Camera or development problem?

3 Columns

A
3 Columns

  • 2
  • 2
  • 15
Couples

A
Couples

  • 1
  • 0
  • 58
Exhibition Card

A
Exhibition Card

  • 3
  • 1
  • 89
Flying Lady

A
Flying Lady

  • 6
  • 2
  • 109

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,040
Messages
2,785,236
Members
99,790
Latest member
suanmein
Recent bookmarks
0

foc

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Messages
2,523
Location
Sligo, Ireland
Format
35mm
I have to give them kudos for spending the time to fully investigate and perform some reprocessing of the film,

Thanks for the update and I agree with you that the lab did try their best to solve the problem and weren't afraid to admit any mistakes.

I have often said before, that a lab can be best judged by how they handle a problem and this one appears to be very professional.
 
OP
OP

logan2z

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 11, 2019
Messages
3,722
Location
SF Bay Area, USA
Format
Multi Format
Well I gave up on mailing film away when Kodak quit the pre-paid processing mailer (2 1st class stamps to mail away, Kodak used your own return address as the label)
Buy a couple Paterson tanks, and the world's easiest, longest lived, film developer, Rodinal. A little bottle of Ilford rapid fix and a wee bottle of LFN wetting agent. I love developing film.
I've had all of the stuff to home develop my film for a long time, but never really relished doing it as I'd rather spend my limited free time out with my camera or in the darkroom making prints. But I've grown tired of dealing with lab-related issues so I'm biting the bullet and starting to develop at home. I'm going to develop my first roll of 35mm film later today.
 
OP
OP

logan2z

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 11, 2019
Messages
3,722
Location
SF Bay Area, USA
Format
Multi Format
I have often said before, that a lab can be best judged by how they handle a problem and this one appears to be very professional.
They are very professional, the lab's general manager handled this himself and communicated regularly with me throughout.
 
OP
OP

logan2z

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 11, 2019
Messages
3,722
Location
SF Bay Area, USA
Format
Multi Format
I forgot to mention, one thing the lab suggested as a possible cause for these issues is the backing paper sticking to the film. I store film in the refrigerator before I use it, allow it to properly warm up before loading it into the camera, and keep it in a cool dry place after exposure/before development. I'm in Northern California so it's a very low humidity environment. Does this sound like a possibility? I know that Kodak has had issues with 120 backing papers in the past but I thought that had long been resolved. I've shot many rolls of 120 Tri-X without issues but I guess it's possible that I got a bad batch? Just guessing here...
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,140
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
How old was the TRi-X? Did the film have the new, almost plastic looking backing paper?
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom