Caltar-II N 90mm/6.8 SN identification

A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 0
  • 0
  • 52
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 0
  • 0
  • 45
img746.jpg

img746.jpg

  • 3
  • 0
  • 52
No Hall

No Hall

  • 1
  • 2
  • 56
Brentwood Kebab!

A
Brentwood Kebab!

  • 1
  • 1
  • 115

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,789
Messages
2,780,858
Members
99,704
Latest member
Harry f3
Recent bookmarks
0
OP
OP

Alexz

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
365
Location
Israel
Format
Multi Format
Well, Kerry, just recieved the actual serial number of the lens in question: 10372025

According to your SN list, this dates back 79-84 years which contradicts what you said above that the ealiest Caltar-II N 90mm/6.8 could be from 1984, however all black shutter still fits into your claim of Rodenstock switching to all black shutters in 1982-84 time frame. Any comments ? BTW, is this lens multicoated (bearing in mind it supposed 1979-84 production time frame) ?

BTW, the front barrel label reads: Caltar II-N 1:6.8 f=90mm MC
 
OP
OP

Alexz

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
365
Location
Israel
Format
Multi Format
Yes, Ruvy, I also tend to think so, but just to make sure..

Would be glad to hear what Kerry will say in regard of above.
 

MichaelBriggs

Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2003
Messages
134
"MC" means that the lens is multicoated. . This is about the time that Copal switched to all black shutters. No one in this thread has stated an exact date for the switch-to-black-shutters. There is no contradiction between these facts. The lens is definitely a Caltar, which means it shouldn't be older than 1984, but the serial number seems slightly low for this date from the serial number table -- but the serial number table has very coarse resolution, so there probably isn't any contradiction.

It is a fine lens. When it left the factory, it was probably optically equivalent to the Grandagon-Ns that the factory is making today. The "MC" is a definite indication that the lens is multicoated.

P.S. Alexz: The link that you found probably won't interest Kerry. It is a copy of a rec.photo discussion in which he was a participant.
 

ReallyBigCameras

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Oct 13, 2004
Messages
808
Format
4x5 Format
Alexz said:
Well, Kerry, just recieved the actual serial number of the lens in question: 10372025

According to your SN list, this dates back 79-84 years which contradicts what you said above that the ealiest Caltar-II N 90mm/6.8 could be from 1984, however all black shutter still fits into your claim of Rodenstock switching to all black shutters in 1982-84 time frame. Any comments ? BTW, is this lens multicoated (bearing in mind it supposed 1979-84 production time frame) ?

BTW, the front barrel label reads: Caltar II-N 1:6.8 f=90mm MC

Alex,

As Michael mentioned, the data in the serial number table has a rather course resolution and can only be used to determine approximate date of production. That said, if you assume annual production was consistent from 1979 - 1984, a serial number of 10372025 would date to late 1983. However, I doubt if annual production was consistant - for the very reason that when Rodenstock began making the Caltar lenses Calumet immediately became their biggest customer. It stands to reason they had a jump in annual production to fulfill Calumet's orders. It is very probable that, for this reason, Rodenstock experienced a significant increase in annual production numbers the instant Calumet contracted with them to produce the entire line of Caltar lenses (both Caltar II-N and Caltar II-E/Caltar Compact). It is entirely possible that a Rodenstock-made Caltar lens with serial number 10372025 was made in 1984 - or at the earliest late 1983.

Also, the reason I stated "It is common knowledge that Rodenstock has been making all the Caltars since 1984." is that 1983/84 was a transition period when Calumet was in the midst of changing suppliers. There was some overlap during 1983 and 1984 when they were phasing out old products and phasing in the new Rodenstock-made products. The 1984 Calumet catalog is the first that features the Rodenstock made Caltar II-N series, but it also continues to list the Caltar HR series (mostly made by Topcon, with the exception of the 210mm f6.8 Caltar HR wich is a re-badged Rodenstock Geronar - later called Caltar II-E and/or Caltar Compact). So, perhaps Rodenstock began making Caltar branded lenses for Calumet as early as 1983, but they did not show up in the Calumet catalog until 1984.

Also, dating of lenses based on serial numbers is a bit imprecise in general. The serial numbers are imprinted at the time the cells are manufacturered. It may be several months before they actually get mounted in a shutter, and then they are shipped to a dealer/distributor before they eventually end up being offered for sale. Schneider used to have some information to this effect on their web site, but I can't seem to locate it at present.

In any case, whether the lens in question was made in 1983 or 1984 makes little difference. It is a very early Rodenstock-made Caltar II-N, and as others have correctly stated, is definitely multicoated (bearing the "MC" imprint). In fact, I have never seen a single coated Caltar II-N (which makes sense as they all date from 1983/1984 or newer. Now , I have seen single coated Caltar S lenses - which were also made by Rodenstock back in the early 1970s (not to be confused with the Caltar S-II series that was made by Schneider from the late 1970s through early 1980s or the 215mm f4.8 Caltar Type-S that was made by Ilex from the late 1960s through about 1977). Again that time period (late 1970s - early 1980s) was very confusing as Calumet changed OEMs several times. All the gory details are in the View Camera article for those who are interested.

Kerry
 

ReallyBigCameras

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Oct 13, 2004
Messages
808
Format
4x5 Format
MichaelBriggs said:
P.S. Alexz: The link that you found probably won't interest Kerry. It is a copy of a rec.photo discussion in which he was a participant.

Yes, I remember that thread. The original table was full of errors, incorrect statements and approximations. Whoever compiled the original table took a good stab at it, but they seemed inclined to fill in their own opinions/assumptions wherever they lacked actual data.

Kerry
 
OP
OP

Alexz

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
365
Location
Israel
Format
Multi Format
Thank you Kerry, very comprehensive.
I understand, quality-wise there is little (if any at all) reason to suspect this particular lens to be lesser then its younger copies (from ;ate 80s, early 90s), right ?
 

ReallyBigCameras

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Oct 13, 2004
Messages
808
Format
4x5 Format
Alexz said:
Thank you Kerry, very comprehensive.
I understand, quality-wise there is little (if any at all) reason to suspect this particular lens to be lesser then its younger copies (from ;ate 80s, early 90s), right ?

Alex,

There have been no changes to the design. As long as the lens is in the condition described, the performance should be quite excellent. If the age impacts anything, it might be the resale value (new "green stripe" models usually fetch a modest premium over older, unstriped samples) - but again here, condition is more important than exact age.

Kerry
 
OP
OP

Alexz

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
365
Location
Israel
Format
Multi Format
Thank you Kerry a lot, sounds indeed reassuring.

Alex
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom