C-41 Development weird streaks. Is this bromide drag and if so how to fix it.

REAndy

Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2018
Messages
107
Location
USA Minnesota
Format
Multi Format
The agitation of rotating in one direction was mentioned. Imagining that in my mind, turning in the same direction, could it be that the spiral of the film is acting like a water pump, and the pressure of the water might be pushing the film from to touch the piece of film just outside it on the spiral? I don't know if I am explaining that right. I also wonder if color film "softer/more flexible" when wet than b/w film? And so the color film being flexed so it touches the next piece of film on the spiral?

My very first development tank was a Yankee. I bought this back in high school in the late 70's. It has a combination thermometer / real agitator. I remember one time I was agitating film, and I was only turning it in one direction (not back and forth as recommended), and when I finished the film and took off the lid, my film had actually unspooled off the real. I know your film didn't go to this extreme, but I wonder about film flex and if the real was being turned, so the outer end of the film was constantly "pulling" developer from the outside to the inside as it turns and this force of "pumping/moving" developer puts pressure on the film flexing it. But what you/I can envision in your "mind's eye" certainly doesn't necessarily mean it is happening in the real world!
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,644
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
how long does the film sit in the tank until the screwdriver rotation starts?
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,627
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
You need more data. How many rolls of C41 have you processed this way? Try your setup without the drill ,just use the Paterson agitation stick. Back and forth.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Aug 13, 2018
Messages
117
Location
Bamberg
Format
Multi Format
You need more data. How many rolls of C41 have you processed this way? Try your setup without the drill ,just use the Paterson agitation stick. Back and forth.
The thing is, I have developed more than 25 35mm Rolls and about 10 120 Rolls of colour film with this agitation method and this problem did never occur. The Paterson agitation stick is attached to the drill. The agitation device I built myself is quite handy though, because I often do push developments of 4 to 5 stops with Fuji CDU2 in C41, and if the developer has seen a few rolls already the dev and blix times get exceedingly long, thats my reasoning for automated agitation in the first place.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Aug 13, 2018
Messages
117
Location
Bamberg
Format
Multi Format
And that last post makes chemical / process problems more likely than bromide drag / agitation.

PE
I´ll develop another Roll of Film in the same batch of chemistry with the same process. If the problem is not persistent, then I´ll just have to live with the risk of ruining a film once in a while ?
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,627
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
If you are processing a lot of film, I would buy a (if you want to use Paterson) deep tank, and incorporate into your temp. control set up. If you use Kodak Flexicolor RA C-41 chemisty you can replenish. The drill agitation is too much, IMHO. Flexicolor RA C-41 has separate bleach, and fixer. Because this is designed to be used in a high speed minilab, you only need to stand and agitate for 7 1/2 minutes, not even that really. The bleach takes 1 minute, and the fixer takes 1 minute. A 5 liter batch of Flexicolor will last a very long time if cared for in a seasoned "tank", and properly stored in full bottles. 1ea. 5L bottle of bleach will last forever, once you make up your working solution it takes something like 9mL ?? per 80 sq. in. to replenish. You will go through the developer and fixer at a faster rate.

IMHO, you need chemistry that has the same activity, more or less, for each roll. The overused Blix, instead of separate fresh Bleach and Fixer, will give you nothing but headaches.

I've used the Tetenal kits, they work OK, as long as you don't try to overuse them. I'm of the opinion, if I am buying Professional films, I will use professional chemistry. Fuji for E-6, Kodak or Fuji for C-41. Tetenal is an outstanding company with great products, Kodak Alaris and Ilford get (AFAIK) all their powdered, and liquid black and white chemistry from them. The Kodak color chemistry for the US is made by Kodak Alaris (China). Fuji-Hunt have plants in the Netherlands and the US.

If you are going to agitate the way you are going to need to keep your chemistry fresh. You may be aerating/oxidizing the solutions??

I have, among every other tank known to man, a 8 reel Paterson tank, deep 8 reel SS tanks etc. It's a simple matter to develop 8 rolls of 135 at a time, and replenish the chemistry.

Mike
 

TMS

Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2018
Messages
1
Location
Czech Republic
Format
Medium Format
Hello,

I have a similar problem so I thought instead of opening new thread I can ask here.
The issue is grey bars repeating through whole roll of film. It is not cause by scanner as i can see it on the film itself and it show on darkroom prints as well.
Kodak Portra 400 120 pushed 3 stops
developed in Tetenal Colortec C-41 kit, fresh mixed working solutions, development time 4:45 (3:15 is standard plus 30sec. for each stop push), Bleach Fix 4 minutes, Stabiliser 1 minute. No pre rinse
I have recently bought the Job processor hoping that it make the processing more easier and consistent and this is my first film developed. Before I was developing in Paterson tank and agitated with the stick provided. I tried few test rolls after and never experienced the same problem but would like to find out why this happed so I know what to avoid in the future.
I will very appreciate your advices.
This is my first post here, but I already found lot of useful tips here in the past.
Thank you

Ps: pleas excuse the poor scan quality, I tried to emphasize the bars.
 

Attachments

  • grey bars.jpg
    252.2 KB · Views: 136

Truzi

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2012
Messages
2,651
Format
Multi Format
When first posted I was distracted by the background banding. On second-look, I think it is the horizontal bar near the bottom of the picture. If that is is, it might be a bit too well defined and straight to be a chemical artifact.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…