Book of Pyro

Brentwood Kebab!

A
Brentwood Kebab!

  • 0
  • 0
  • 46
Summer Lady

A
Summer Lady

  • 0
  • 0
  • 51
DINO Acting Up !

A
DINO Acting Up !

  • 0
  • 0
  • 31
What Have They Seen?

A
What Have They Seen?

  • 0
  • 0
  • 44
Lady With Attitude !

A
Lady With Attitude !

  • 0
  • 0
  • 42

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,764
Messages
2,780,590
Members
99,700
Latest member
Harryyang
Recent bookmarks
0

Bob Carnie

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
7,735
Location
toronto
Format
Med. Format RF
I have run thousands upon thousands of runs of PMK on Rotary Jobo, actually in the middle of a series of runs right now and over this weekend.
Have been doing this for over 18years.
 

c6h6o3

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2002
Messages
3,215
Format
Large Format
It turns out that there are a lot of opinions in photography. Just like not everyone thinks staining developers are best, not all that do think that Pyrocat is best. Different strokes for different folks.

Yeah, I used to be a real 'pyromaniac' until I read an interview with Brett Weston where he said he's stopped using ABC pyro in favor of a non-staining one (Ethol UFG, if I recall correctly). He said, "it really doesn't make much difference". The ultimate irony is that Sandy King makes only digital negatives now. At least that was what he was doing the last time I talked to him.
 

Bob Carnie

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
7,735
Location
toronto
Format
Med. Format RF
Yes but all Sandys current neg's are done as always, he also has been playing with an IR cheater camera.

I like PMK , but I also like ID11 and other developers, basically it boils down to what lighting ratio you are trying to capture , with an exposure developer plan .


Yeah, I used to be a real 'pyromaniac' until I read an interview with Brett Weston where he said he's stopped using ABC pyro in favor of a non-staining one (Ethol UFG, if I recall correctly). He said, "it really doesn't make much difference". The ultimate irony is that Sandy King makes only digital negatives now. At least that was what he was doing the last time I talked to him.
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
13,928
Format
8x10 Format
Well, staining pyro formulas have made a gigantic difference for me in terms of printing ease and quality, in all formats. Saying you quit because of something Brett Weston said way back when might not have any relevance with today's films and papers. But at that point in time he mainly shot medium format using Agfapan, and deliberately underexposed and overdeveloped to give him those famous blacked out graphic shadows. So if you want to eat your cake and have it too, with reference to detail in both the deep shadows and upper highlights, that approach won't work so well. There are all kinds of pyro formulas, some based on pyrogallol and some on pyrocat. Once LFF is back up, one can look up the "pyro war" threads of past years, which got pretty brutal between different potential formula tweaks. I eventually threw a few punches myself. I don't know how Bob does it in a Jobo unless he uses an awful lot of solution volume to keep the air out in the first place. I personally keep about a dozen different film developers in the lab, mostly for specialized purposes, but like I said earlier, still prefer
basic PMK for general usage.
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,961
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
The Book Of Pyro may be 21 years old, but there are still some gems in it.
PMK didn't work for me because I mainly use BTZS tubes. I switched to Rollo pyro, which essentially is PMK, but for rotary. In the end I switched to Pyrocat-HD, because I prefered the look, and of it's ability to give extremely high aqutance in stand/semi-stand devleopment.
Still love Xtol, and D-19. To each his own.
 

john_s

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
2,139
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
Medium Format
Don't reuse it!

I didn't have any intention of trying to reuse it. My experiment came out of my experience that dev time didn't seem to make much difference, after I tried for a bit more contrast for a particular roll and didn't achieve it with longer processing. I concluded that I was already close to development to exhaustion in my normal processing described above.
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
13,928
Format
8x10 Format
Maybe it's just a matter of ethics. Gordon H. took all the trouble to revive interest in pyro, came up with the first popular, convenient modern tweak, and to my knowledge receives no royalties on sales of the chemistry, which he gave us the recipe for anyway. I can't image he got rich over this, with the occasional workshop or print sale. So he certainly deserves a little monetary reward from people buying the book. Besides, it's got some interesting anecdotal historical information and safety notices. And he's never been one to discourage experimenting with later
formulas concocted by others.
 

PhotoJim

Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2005
Messages
2,314
Location
Regina, SK, CA
Format
35mm
He didn't revive the interest in Pyro. Wimberley did.

They both did. Wimberley started it; Hutchings gave it a significant upward push. PMK is what got me to try pyrogallol.
 

john_s

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 19, 2002
Messages
2,139
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
Medium Format
Maybe it's just a matter of ethics. Gordon H. took all the trouble to revive interest in pyro, came up with the first popular, convenient modern tweak, and to my knowledge receives no royalties on sales of the chemistry, which he gave us the recipe for anyway. I can't image he got rich over this, with the occasional workshop or print sale. So he certainly deserves a little monetary reward from people buying the book. Besides, it's got some interesting anecdotal historical information and safety notices. And he's never been one to discourage experimenting with later
formulas concocted by others.

I remember that he used to sell the book direct by mail order. That's how I bought my copy.

I wonder if that's still the case.
 

damonff

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2005
Messages
128
Location
Washington,
Format
35mm
I didn't have any intention of trying to reuse it. My experiment came out of my experience that dev time didn't seem to make much difference, after I tried for a bit more contrast for a particular roll and didn't achieve it with longer processing. I concluded that I was already close to development to exhaustion in my normal processing described above.

Sorry, I was confused. I thought you were attempting to use it again for a second roll.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom