Keeping it analog...
Certainly a Rank Cintel scan of one's film and non-linear editing with pro hardware and software is the state of the art. But in a comparison between consumer-grade iMovie and the Bolex splicer, I found the Bolex splicer compared very favorably.
I found iMovie to be a little difficult to use. It was hard to standardize the fades, and setting clip length was difficult. It was hard to establish and maintain a rhythm in my project.
On the other hand, the Bolex splicer is a real gem and nothing like the 'cheapie' plastic splicers that populated home-movie-making households in the 70s.
This fantastic device shaves the film into two overlapping tapers that are then welded together, maintaining the image on the emulsion side and leaving a clear splice. There is a faint line through one frame.
Anyone interested in analog film would do well to pick up one of these splicers.
(I can post a splicing 'how to do it' thread if anyone is interested.)
Certainly a Rank Cintel scan of one's film and non-linear editing with pro hardware and software is the state of the art. But in a comparison between consumer-grade iMovie and the Bolex splicer, I found the Bolex splicer compared very favorably.
I found iMovie to be a little difficult to use. It was hard to standardize the fades, and setting clip length was difficult. It was hard to establish and maintain a rhythm in my project.
On the other hand, the Bolex splicer is a real gem and nothing like the 'cheapie' plastic splicers that populated home-movie-making households in the 70s.
This fantastic device shaves the film into two overlapping tapers that are then welded together, maintaining the image on the emulsion side and leaving a clear splice. There is a faint line through one frame.
Anyone interested in analog film would do well to pick up one of these splicers.
(I can post a splicing 'how to do it' thread if anyone is interested.)
