• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Bloxygen (argon) spray

a sidebar

H
a sidebar

  • Tel
  • Feb 3, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
  • 43
On The Mound

A
On The Mound

  • 1
  • 3
  • 78

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
202,147
Messages
2,835,801
Members
101,135
Latest member
aenser
Recent bookmarks
0

Kino

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,992
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
Been looking for someone to do this for a while. I understand you can use Butane as a liquid chemical preservative, but I'd rather not use flammable gas and investing in a rechargeable cylinder and regulator for Argon was too much.

Just ordered a few cans; anyone else try this?

 
OP
OP
Kino

Kino

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,992
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
These are pure Argon; the wine preservatives usually have a mixture of gasses.

Might not matter, but it's only marginally more expensive per spray can.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
55,414
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Paint preservers too:
1770001223513.png


1770001270590.png
 

bewilson

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
153
Location
Utah
Format
4x5 Format
My innner chemist just got interested.

Looking at https://www.ready.noaa.gov/documents/TutorialX/files/Chem_henry.pdf which shows how much each gas dissolves into water, here are the relative solubilities of some common gasses that aren't acidic nor basic:

Gas Solubility (molar/atm) reactive?
Oxygen 0.0001 YES (so don't use this)
Hydrogen 0.0008 YES
Nitrogen 0.0003 NO
Argon 0.001 NO
Butane 0.001 Maybe (I really don't know here because I don't know the reduction potentials of the developers, but think it's higher than 0.8v)

In using gasses to purge oxygen out of the headpace of a solution, the main consideration is how much dissolves. If you add a very soluble gas over the solution, it will dissolve, creating a vacuum in the headspace. That vacuum will pull air into the bottle, and your developer-preservation plan is foiled. So, avoiding those gasses that will react with your developer (O2 and H2), nitrogen is the next best of the common gasses. Nitrogen also has one MASSIVE advantage over all the other gasses: it's already saturated in the solution! It got there when the water came out of your aerating faucet (provided you didn't boil the water before making your developer).

In the labs I worked in we always used nitrogen to displace oxygen unless we were using a reaction where nitrogen was one of the reactants (like nitrogenase studies).

So, who sells canned nitrogen gas?

P.S. This always works best when you sparge the solution with the headspace preservative, ie. blow the gas deep into the solution. Little red straws for the win.
 

qqphot

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 12, 2022
Messages
263
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Format
35mm RF
Nitrogen should be fine for anything, I suppose. But for photo chemicals I've sometimes wondered if Dust-Off (difluoroethane) would be good enough. It's probably a bit more water soluble than you'd want at 0.02g/100mL but I wonder if it's reactive with anything commonly used in photochemistry. I'm unfortunately too lazy to do side by side tests to find out if it impacts development.
 

sufnturf

Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2024
Messages
20
Location
Germany
Format
35mm
My innner chemist just got interested.

Looking at https://www.ready.noaa.gov/documents/TutorialX/files/Chem_henry.pdf which shows how much each gas dissolves into water, here are the relative solubilities of some common gasses that aren't acidic nor basic:

Gas Solubility (molar/atm) reactive?
Oxygen 0.0001 YES (so don't use this)
Hydrogen 0.0008 YES
Nitrogen 0.0003 NO
Argon 0.001 NO
Butane 0.001 Maybe (I really don't know here because I don't know the reduction potentials of the developers, but think it's higher than 0.8v)

In using gasses to purge oxygen out of the headpace of a solution, the main consideration is how much dissolves. If you add a very soluble gas over the solution, it will dissolve, creating a vacuum in the headspace. That vacuum will pull air into the bottle, and your developer-preservation plan is foiled. So, avoiding those gasses that will react with your developer (O2 and H2), nitrogen is the next best of the common gasses. Nitrogen also has one MASSIVE advantage over all the other gasses: it's already saturated in the solution! It got there when the water came out of your aerating faucet (provided you didn't boil the water before making your developer).

In the labs I worked in we always used nitrogen to displace oxygen unless we were using a reaction where nitrogen was one of the reactants (like nitrogenase studies).

So, who sells canned nitrogen gas?

P.S. This always works best when you sparge the solution with the headspace preservative, ie. blow the gas deep into the solution. Little red straws for the win.

The most commonly used "spray" (in Germany I think) to preserve photographic chemicals was Tetenals “Protectan”.
It can simply be summarised by calling it “expensive dust off” or Propane + Butane.
IMHO it should be safe as long as there’s no fire hazard around and displaces oxygen whilst being heavier than air.
 

tezzasmall

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 29, 2013
Messages
1,186
Location
Southend on Sea Essex UK
Format
Plastic Cameras
Been looking for someone to do this for a while. I understand you can use Butane as a liquid chemical preservative, but I'd rather not use flammable gas and investing in a rechargeable cylinder and regulator for Argon was too much.

Just ordered a few cans; anyone else try this?

The most commonly used "spray" (in Germany I think) to preserve photographic chemicals was Tetenals “Protectan”.
It can simply be summarised by calling it “expensive dust off” or Propane + Butane.
IMHO it should be safe as long as there’s no fire hazard around and displaces oxygen whilst being heavier than air.
Some of us on FADU have discussed this problem a few times.

I have used and tried various food and wine preservers, as well as Protectan. The former went wrong in dispensing the gas quite a few times, but the company selling it were very good in replacing a few cans for me.

Protectan worked well, but like the former, it too became expensive long term.

I then read the posts about using butane lighter gas, which is easily found for at least 1/10th the cost, so it became a no brainer. I too worried a little about it being flammable, but no one seems to have ever had a fire problem with it over the many years that it's been used, probably partly because very little is used at a time, so it might be worth a rethink on your part. :smile:

As for getting an tank of argon, I also looked at that, and couldn't find a small amount of it, and like you implied, it would be a bit overkill, even though the gas itself appears to be relatively cheap like this, but unless you are a welder using it all the time...

Terry S
UK
 
OP
OP
Kino

Kino

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,992
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
Some of us on FADU have discussed this problem a few times.

I have used and tried various food and wine preservers, as well as Protectan. The former went wrong in dispensing the gas quite a few times, but the company selling it were very good in replacing a few cans for me.

Protectan worked well, but like the former, it too became expensive long term.

I then read the posts about using butane lighter gas, which is easily found for at least 1/10th the cost, so it became a no brainer. I too worried a little about it being flammable, but no one seems to have ever had a fire problem with it over the many years that it's been used, probably partly because very little is used at a time, so it might be worth a rethink on your part. :smile:

As for getting an tank of argon, I also looked at that, and couldn't find a small amount of it, and like you implied, it would be a bit overkill, even though the gas itself appears to be relatively cheap like this, but unless you are a welder using it all the time...

Terry S
UK
Terry,

Thanks for the response.

I have already ordered a couple of cans of the Bloxygen, which cost roughly $14 USD per can including shipment, so I will try them out and see what I think.

I looked into the gasses you can typically recharge at welding supply shops (Argon, Nitrogen, Helium, etc.), but as stated before, the initial investment for tanks and regulators was simply too expensive for my relatively small use.

Just wanted to post to give yet another option to photographers looking for a solution to extending mixed photo chemistry life.

I think what I ordered should last at least a few years, so the price wasn't that great.
 

ags2mikon

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2009
Messages
740
Location
New Mexico
Format
Multi Format
One advantage to the nitrogen tank and regulator is you can use it for nitrogen burst agitation and airing up your tires. If you do your own HVAC work it is good for purging lines.
 

warden

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
3,235
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Medium Format
I've been using marbles in amber glass bottles to mechanically keep oxygen out. Is this better/worse/same as using gas?
 
OP
OP
Kino

Kino

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,992
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
I've been using marbles in amber glass bottles to mechanically keep oxygen out. Is this better/worse/same as using gas?

Both do the same function; I just got tired of cleaning, drying several pounds of marbles.
 

ags2mikon

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2009
Messages
740
Location
New Mexico
Format
Multi Format
You can buy marbles of different sizes from Amazon. That's a lot better than appropating them from the kids. I use small tiny ones for my small bottles and regular sizes for my big bottles. It also helps when mixing, just be gentle to keep from breaking a bottle and losing your marbles.
 

bdial

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
7,518
Location
North East U.S.
Format
Multi Format
I gave up on marbles when I found they were introducing lots of crud i.e. glass chips into the developer and onto my film. No matter how much I washed them, I still ended up with crud on my film. Then I had a bottle of developer and marbles slip out of my hand and shatter.

Several years ago, I found a nitrogen cylinder for sale that was from a retired nitrogen bust agitation system. I haven’t tried to make a formal test, but some 2 YO D-76 worked fine for the last roll of film I processed.
 

Patrick Robert James

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 31, 2012
Messages
3,425
Format
35mm RF
I use Butane. I tried Bloxygen but it didn't last long. As in, went to use it and nothing came out after maybe four or five small uses. Not worth it. Butane is a no brainer and it works fine. Glass/butane keeps things for a looooong time.
 

btaylor

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
2,299
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Large Format
I tried the marbles thing too- it was awkward. Ended up going with wine bags from Amazon. Easy to use and store. I also use plastic soda bottles, just squeeze out the air and cap. Whatever works for you.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom