Black VS. Chrome camera bodies.

IMG_7114w.jpg

D
IMG_7114w.jpg

  • 2
  • 0
  • 45
Cycling with wife #1

D
Cycling with wife #1

  • 0
  • 0
  • 40
Papilio glaucus

D
Papilio glaucus

  • 2
  • 0
  • 32
The Bee keeper

A
The Bee keeper

  • 1
  • 4
  • 155
120 Phoenix Red?

A
120 Phoenix Red?

  • 7
  • 3
  • 160

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,184
Messages
2,770,767
Members
99,573
Latest member
A nother Kodaker
Recent bookmarks
0

skahde

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2004
Messages
492
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
RichSBV said:
Speaking from the early days, there was a reason why professional cameras were black and consumer cameras were silver. The pro cameras were brass bodies. This didn't loook good, so they were painted. Black was the obvious choice.
Don't think so. It is easy to put a chrome plating on brass but it is *much* harder to put a durable black coating on brass which comes close in durability (well used black Leica M3 and an MP are worn to the brass today in most cases with only little coating left). Aluminium can be anodized black without any problem which keeps very well.

Therefore, following your line of argument, amateur cameras would have been black and pro cameras chrome.

Best

Stefan
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom