Black VS. Chrome camera bodies.

End Table

A
End Table

  • 1
  • 1
  • 52
Cafe Art

A
Cafe Art

  • 8
  • 3
  • 177
Sciuridae

A
Sciuridae

  • 6
  • 3
  • 179
Takatoriyama

D
Takatoriyama

  • 6
  • 3
  • 172

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,658
Messages
2,762,529
Members
99,430
Latest member
colloquialphotograph
Recent bookmarks
0

Mike Kennedy

Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2005
Messages
1,594
Location
Eastern Cana
Format
Multi Format
Is there a reason, besides esthetics, for the difference in finishes?
I thought that maybe a black clad camera could be a little more unobstrusive in situations where being a photographer could be hazardous to your health. As a war photojournalist for example. Just wondering.

Mike
 

Lee L

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
3,281
Format
Multi Format
See this thread:

(there was a url link here which no longer exists)

Lee
 

Surly

Member
Joined
May 3, 2005
Messages
104
Format
4x5 Format
A silver finish will reflect heat and keep camera internals and film cooler in hot conditions. The "silver" finish I believe is a hard chrome and also wears better. The black finish is not as durable, typically. As a result, the black will wear and show brassing more rapidly than a silver finished camera. Ironically, you pay more for the black camera but the resale will go down faster if it shows brassing. I am speaking from my experience of using older Nikon SLR's. There may be many exceptions to this.
I have two Nikkormat's and I use the black one more but the siver one is broken :smile:
They are of the same general age and the silver one looks better because of the brassing. Of course brassing has nothing to do with image quality.
 

Gerald Koch

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2004
Messages
1,662
Format
Multi Format
Theoretically, the bright chrome, especially when reflecting light, draws attention to the camera and therefore the photographer. Not what you want when taking candids. What Surley says about initial and resale prices is true.
 

BruceN

Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2004
Messages
585
Location
Wyoming
Format
Multi Format
I will sometimes tape one up with some of that camoflage gun and bow tape if I'm trying to sneak up and photograph some woodland critter. Not at any other time, though.

Bruce
 

RichSBV

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2005
Messages
255
Location
South of Roc
Format
Large Format
Speaking from the early days, there was a reason why professional cameras were black and consumer cameras were silver. The pro cameras were brass bodies. This didn't loook good, so they were painted. Black was the obvious choice. The consumer cameras were left silver because that's the color brushed aluminum was and it looked good. The original pro brass cameras were heavier duty and could take much more of a beating than the thinner and softer aluminum versions.

Later, when black caught on and everyone wanted a "pro" camera, they painted the aluminum bodies too and it all became meaningless...

Silver cameras will not 'brass' as there no brass underneath the silver color.... Excluding the few that were plated brass...
 

mgb74

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 24, 2005
Messages
4,767
Location
MN and MA US
Format
Multi Format
RichSBV said:
Speaking from the early days, there was a reason why professional cameras were black and consumer cameras were silver. The pro cameras were brass bodies. This didn't loook good, so they were painted. Black was the obvious choice. The consumer cameras were left silver because that's the color brushed aluminum was and it looked good. The original pro brass cameras were heavier duty and could take much more of a beating than the thinner and softer aluminum versions.

Later, when black caught on and everyone wanted a "pro" camera, they painted the aluminum bodies too and it all became meaningless...

Silver cameras will not 'brass' as there no brass underneath the silver color.... Excluding the few that were plated brass...


Not sure when the "early days" ended, but my black Nikon FM2 has slight brassing, and does in fact show brass underneath (or at least the color of brass). I wouldn't consider the FM2 "consumer grade", but it wasn't their top of the line pro camera either.

My Minolta XE7 (earlier than the FM2) also showed brass underneath.

I've no doubt that some of the pre-plastic consumer cameras are painted aluminum, but I wonder where the change is made.
 

Lee L

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
3,281
Format
Multi Format
I believe there were many cameras made with chrome on brass. The XE-7 was chrome on brass, and shared many parts with the Leica R-3. IIRC, all of Canon AE-1 production was polycarbonate on the top, part of what made it one of the most feature-rich cameras at a great price, and a runaway best seller. My father-in-law was rough on his Minolta X-700, which was black over polycarbonate, but there is also a shiny brass-colored layer under the black finish and on top of the white polycarbonate top casting. Bottom plates on many of the cameras with polycarbonate tops may be metal to keep them thin and because they seat battery compartments and tripod sockets, so any finish rubbed off there may appear to be a brass color.

Lee
 

firecracker

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2005
Messages
1,950
Location
Japan
Format
35mm
Mike Kennedy said:
Is there a reason, besides esthetics, for the difference in finishes?
I thought that maybe a black clad camera could be a little more unobstrusive in situations where being a photographer could be hazardous to your health. As a war photojournalist for example. Just wondering.

Mike

It all depends. I heard back in the early (to mid) 90's, little silvery-looking Sony Hi8 Handycam was a way to make video documentaries in Sarajevo. Because the snipers would be pointing their rifles at anyone with a tool that looked weapons. But even with that little video camera, if you looked through the viewfinders in an open field, you would get shot from distance.

Also, lately I heard when you travel to certain countries where secret police are tough, the last thing you want to do is to present yourself as someone who's eager to take pictures. Based on your possession of tools and documents, they could suspect you as a spy. I don't know for sure since I'm not a pro in that field.

I'm not trying to scare you, but the bottom line seems to be that you don't want to carry around too many high-tech gadgets. And I regret that I got rid of my old beatup Nikon FM that I was using back in college.
 

Eric Rose

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2002
Messages
6,841
Location
T3A5V4
Format
Multi Format
What has already been said is very true. Except in the case of Leica. The Leica's with the black bodies and black lenses have better bokeh than the silver ones.
 

Daniel Lawton

Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2005
Messages
474
Location
California
Format
Multi Format
Thats because the black lenses absorb the solar rays and facilitate the production of "glow" while the silver ones reflect this solar energy thus producing substandard "glow."
 

Surly

Member
Joined
May 3, 2005
Messages
104
Format
4x5 Format
Absorb solar rays and reflect solar rays? You're kidding right? How can the bokeh be effected by anything other than internal components? You guys are taking the piss arent you?
 

Steve Roberts

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2004
Messages
1,298
Location
Near Tavisto
Format
35mm
Surly said:
The black finish is not as durable, typically. As a result, the black will wear and show brassing more rapidly than a silver finished camera. QUOTE]

Hi All,
To add to the above comment, a contact of mine who was in the photographic retail trade once told me how he'd sold a black bodied 35 SLR to a customer. A few days later, the customer re-appeared to buy a case. He had the SLR with him, but when he produced it, it was showing brassing around all the usual wear points to the degree one would expect to see after years of use. On questioning, the customer admitted that he'd whiled away an evening with a bit of fine abrasive paper and some Brasso trying to give the new camera the kind of worn look that it might have gained with heavy use in the hands of a pro.
On a different note, I had reason to take apart my black Pentax ME some years ago. I'd always been under the impression that where the black coating had worn off, I was seeing brass underneath, but on taking the top off it was immediately apparent that there wasn't a bit of metal in sight. The whole top was plastic, carefully coloured to look like brass when its coating wore off on the corners.

Best wishes,
Steve
 

Flotsam

Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2002
Messages
3,221
Location
S.E. New Yor
When Contax reintroduced the S2, they also offered the S2b which had a Black body. I said "Forget it! If I have to pay a sick price for a Titanium camera, I'll be d@mned if I am going to get it covered up with paint".
 

narsuitus

Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2004
Messages
1,813
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
In 35mm, I use both. The black body had an advantage over the chrome body in two situations:

1. When attempting to shoot reluctant subjects inconspicuously, the black body draws less attention than the shiny chrome body.

2. When shooting small subjects on or under glass, the reflection of the black body in the glass is less than that of the chrome body.

On one hand, I personally prefer the appearance of the black body; on the other hand, I prefer the way the chrome body withstands everyday wear and tear.
 

Daniel Lawton

Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2005
Messages
474
Location
California
Format
Multi Format
Surly said:
Absorb solar rays and reflect solar rays? You're kidding right? How can the bokeh be effected by anything other than internal components? You guys are taking the piss arent you?

Yes, I was being sarcastic. My apologies
 

Charles Webb

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2004
Messages
1,723
Location
Colorfull, C
Format
Multi Format
I still think I get better gas milage in my car when I am carrying black finished cameras, Nikon in my case. I would trade Bokeh any time for better gas milage! Charlie.............
 

Eric Rose

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2002
Messages
6,841
Location
T3A5V4
Format
Multi Format
Of course I was joking! Any chance I get to poke a stick at the bokeh boys I will ha ha. But I must say plopping a heavy metal black body Nikon on the bar counter worked wonders in my younger days.
 

Seele

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2004
Messages
194
Location
Sydney Austr
When sensitive materials became fast enough to enable hand-held exposures, hand cameras became the fashion and to make them less obvious, American makers started to have them covered in black leather, with metal parts finished in black. Remnants of this approach can still be seen nowadays with cameras partially covered in leather.

Anyway, this tradition carried on when smaller format cameras became viable: even during the earlier days of 35mm photography, both early Leica and Contax cameras were finished likewise, with metal parts finished in black.

It was when nickel plating became economical enough that larger camera parts started to be bright finished, and later on, when chrome plating became affordable as an industrial process, the use of this harder-wearing finish became wide-spread: camera then acquired the connoctation of "male jewellery".

Sure enough, with modern manufacturing techniques and materials, black cameras are actually cheaper to produce: the plastics materials can be of solid black colour so that no extra finishing would be required to make a black-bodied camera. In that sense, a "chrome-finish" camera would cost more to make, and of course, many plastics-bodied cameras with applied chrome finish can look pretty tatty after a while as the surface coating gets rubbed off.

For me, black cameras remain a more viable option for my style of 35mm photographic work for being less conspicuous.
 

Lee Shively

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2004
Messages
1,324
Location
Louisiana, U
Format
Multi Format
I personally prefer chrome to black bodies. Not only does chrome wear better than black paint, chrome reflects heat along with light. I never understood Canon's philosophy of painting their L-series telephotos a light grey to reflect heat and then only offering their top cameras in black. Ever been out in the sun for a couple of hours with your Canon EOS and L-series telephoto on a tripod? The lens will be relatively cool while the camera will burn you to the touch.

These days, black camera bodies dominate. So does plastic. Taking an inventory of all my cameras, I only have one that's real chrome--a Leica M6. The EOS Rebel doesn't count, being fake-chrome plastic.
 

matchat

Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2005
Messages
19
Location
Sheffield, E
Format
35mm
From what I hear the black cameras were black so as to minimise any reflections from the flash bouncing off the camera & reflecting in the subjects eyes. Also black was less obtrusive in use as it didn't shine as much. Ironically the black bodiesmade of brass are usually not as strong as the chromed bodies (they dent more easily). I believe that black cameras took off because Cartier Bresson used to use black tape on his Leica's.
 

Russ - SVP

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2005
Messages
755
Location
Washington
Format
35mm
It's common knowledge that black bodies produce sharper images with better Bokeh.

Kiron Kid
 

Surly

Member
Joined
May 3, 2005
Messages
104
Format
4x5 Format
Daniel Lawton said:
Yes, I was being sarcastic. My apologies
I'm so glad the bokeh thing was a joke. "Bokeh boys" HA that's hilarious.
Please, dont ever apologize for being sarcastic! Come on now, my name is Surly and my avatar is a black and white painting! I live for sarcasm.
 

Eric Mac

Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2004
Messages
118
Location
City by the
Format
35mm RF
Here is my take on the situation.

Black= black and white

Chrome= slides

Eric
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom