Strange...I have never found that mine overheats the slides, but then again we got a completely different line of projectors compared to the the USA, designed and manufacturered by Kodak AG in Stuttgart, all based on the original 1963 Carousel Model S.
I would use a mirror in the light path, tilted to 45 degrees. You will need to reverse the slides.Yes OlyMan, perfect! You're right.
In Europe there were only S-AV models 1xxx and 2xxx until 1991, then from 1992 only Ektapro and Ektalite. S-av 2050 was (and is) a war horse of 80s.
Someone of you know if there is possible to project in vertical on the ceiling? It is impossible or exist a gear that can do that?
No the EU models were completely different. Possibly the US and EU ranges converged in the 1990s when the Ektalkite and Ektapro ranges appeared here, but mention Kodak Carousel to most people this side of the pond and they will visualise one of the Kodak Carousel 20xx models that were ubiquitous at every AV exhibit and conference hall from the mid 1960s right through to the of the century:
![]()
There were a range of '10xx' semi-pro models, but they straddled a difficult territory, being very expensive for home users but not built durable enough for pro/permanent installations. Consequently they're rarer to find on the used market than the pro '20xx' models.
Someone of you know if there is possible to project in vertical on the ceiling? It is impossible or exist a gear that can do that?
They were and are very scarce. I've never seen one in person. Not many buyers were tempted by the extra cost of its automatic lamp changer, not to mention the additional bulk. Though it's easy to see the attraction of such a facility in unmanned installations.And this is the top model of s-av 2xxx:
![]()
And of course, we used glass mounts, such as GEPE, to keep the film flat.
lol! It's good to be patriotic, though even then it was increasingly difficult!
But for instance Leitz offered their early projectors with at least two qualities of lenses. And thus the same model shows up now with lenses of different qualities.At a reasonable viewing distance a lens made for projectors by Kodak, Leitz, Zeiss, or Rollie will be more than adequate.
Agreed. Maybe decades ago there were different qualities of projector lenses for 35mm (noted by AgX above), but in recent years I really doubt there was much between them. By the time you're projecting a 35mm transparency to in excess of six feet across. the bottleneck is the small film format not the lens.Actually I fail to see any reason why the normal lens provided with a slide projector should not suffice, unless you require a wide angle or long throw lens. It isn't as if you are going to go up close and personal to look at a projected image. At a reasonable viewing distance a lens made for projectors by Kodak, Leitz, Zeiss, or Rollie will be more than adequate.
Strange, 44 replies, and so far no mention of slides jamming. You all must have been lucky!
Been there, done that and got the T shirt, with GAF 502's and Rollei P355's. Registration was always an issue as well: they couldn't be relied upon to pull the sides in to the projector precisely each time, so special effects that relied on the near-perfect alignment between two cross-fading slides (such as focus-shifting between two points of interest in the exact same scene) were a nightmare. Having dumped horizontal trays in favor of gravity-fed Carousels, all those problems ceased.Strange, 44 replies, and so far no mention of slides jamming. You all must have been lucky!
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |