When the first programme ended with talk of WW1 it looked as if prog 2 would take up the story from there but disappointingly for me, it didn't. There was the inevitable ration of over-indulgence and up-own-backside stuff (just who was that bloke who turns photographs upside down to see what the photographer "must have been seeing"???) but the highlight of the hour for me was Walker Evans. I recall from somewhere that the migrant mother as usually seen is actually cleverly retouched for added effect. (Was the woman's left hand touched out? I'm sure someone here will know).
I'm hoping for some more war photography - surely Capa will warrant a sizeable section - but in four hours they're never going to cover everything in depth.
Steve
I doubt if any yanks will watch this, the idea of 60 minutes of uninterrupted TV will too much to handle.
Actually, the migrant mother is Dorothea Lange, not Walker Evans. .
what the heck is Ovation? Isn't that a guitar?? Anyway, I spoke with my local PBS station a week or so ago and they said they will look into running it.
This week's was excellent once again. WW2 soldier/photographer Tony Vaccaro describing how he developed rolls of 35mm, using chemicals scavenged from a bombed out photography store, in four soldier's helmets, was priceless!
Don't forget he was in bombed out Europe. No street lights, no light pollution. I have experienced similar in central rural Wales (between Lampeter and Tregaron). On a moonless night it's pitch black and you really cannot see anything. Your eyes don't acclimatise either.
I thought this weeks episode concentrating on street photography was god but not quite up to the standard of the previous ones (maybe it's just me not being as interested in the subject matter) However what was good was the short 30 min programme that followed about James Ravillious and his wonderful photographs of North Devon.
This one? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Boulevard_du_Temple.jpgIn part IV they show a photograph of a street scene where the only people you see are a man and a shoeshine boy, because the others are moving too fast. They claimed that the photo was made by Louis Daguerre, but I have always been under the impression that it was a photograph by Nicephore Niepce. Does anybody know for certain?
- Justin
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?