ATP [new TechPan]

[Wishy]

Retrophotographic now have the kits in stock (4 rolls, 4 20ml dev bottles, 125ml fix) for £17 or £22 depending on the developer combo.

Might give it a try, but its a lot for 4 rolls!

 

[kram]

Wishy- guess what, I ordered a 4 pack kit this afternoon (before reading your thread). As I was impressed with the DC developer, thats the kit I got (yep... the £22 one).

 

[Wishy]

Kram, if you are uk based fancy some swapsies?

 

[kram]

http://www.flickr.com/photos/26311438@N06/2479370058/" title="Zeiss Ikon f2 35mm+ Rollei ATP by pie hot, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3155/2479370058_2a340f0776_b.jpg
Photo taken taken the ATP film at 40ASA. I thought I could zoom in more than I could on Flickr (it's a 3.6meg file). Can I post large files in APUG?

Wishy, if my photos were any good maybe.

 

[Iwagoshi]

The link was hard to follow, so I took the liberty of simplifying the process, I hope you don't mind. Anyway, is this your ATP photo? Titled: Zeiss Ikon f2 35mm+ Rollei ATP

Terry

 

[keithwms]

How 'bout some crops, please.... I'd like to see what kind of edge contrast this film delivers.

 

[WRSchmalfuss]

ROLLEI ATP1.1

Alan J - Keep testing, my suppler of ATP in the UK only supplies the test kitt or film. They don't do the bigger 140ml bottles of developer.

Wolf, any chance of doing the developer in larger bottles- say-250 ml +?

Regards Mark

Hi Mark, if ROLLEI/MACO notice that the market ask for 250ml bottles, I guess, this should be no problem at all. But for now, 140ml is the max.

The ROLLEI ATP1.1 is as roll film 120 also in the pipeline, and should be on the market, at the Photokina in Cologne/Germany.

Regards, Wolf

 

[Wishy]

Wishy, if my photos were any good maybe.

I meant a roll of the film + one bottle of dev for some other film?

 

[kram]

Yep that's the photo. I will try and put some sections on.

Wishy got any Adox CMS 20?

Wolf - can't find anyone in the UK that does the 140ml bottles.

 

[kram]

Keith - blow ups now on Flickr - note original 8x12 print scanned on canon 8400f.
I find that the way I developed the film, gives well rounded contrast. Pan F plus at 32ASA on a bright day is too contrasty for me, OK at 40ASA, but I feel should be shot at 50ASA. However, on a British overcast day (in winter!) 32ASA might be the right ASA (well for the process I use).

If you really want to see another photo - and it's of the same roll of film, but completely different subject, it's has a person in it (+ this one will have examples of under developement down one edge). Just ask - but I won't put as many blow ups on, it take ages.

 

[j4425]

My 1st impressions after shooting in a Nikon FE Micro Nikkor 55/2.8 and developing in the special developer 1+15 for 8 minutes:

Just wondering how you got that development time. Maybe I'm just dense but the tech sheet only gives dilutions and times for RHC, RHS, RLC developers. The included developer seems to be similar to SPUR Technospeed correct. I'm honestly a little confused. Maybe someone could lend a helping hand. Also, the tech sheet states that no stop bath should be used. Should I use a water stop or avoid stopping entirely? Thanks in advance...

 

[kram]

I didn't use any stop. Just straight to the fixer.

Wolf - I take that the roll film will be 120, or will there be 220. I know a few people miss the 220 rolls.