The AI summary is unreliable. There's no reference I can find online to it ever being sold. I searched Google Books and found nothing.
Ansco 103 was their Universal Film and Paper Developer.
But why would "Ansco 130" even be a thing if they never sold it, I wonder?
If you give this a try, please do let us know how it went.
You may be right because I spent an hour or two looking for old catalog references.
But why would "Ansco 130" even be a thing if they never sold it, I wonder?
rather than microwave a pre-frozen TV dinner
I just need to find potassium bromide somewhere... Here I can buy almost any chemical (even some that shouldn't be able too...) but why doesn't anyone stock KBr goes beyond my comprehension.
Yes, I've also checked Disactis. My normal supplier is Silaba (north portugal, they sell everything, to anyone, from A. Dichromate, to fuming N. Acid and Catechol, and ship them by mail) they have lots of stuff but I now they sell stuff from SordaLab (France), I can buy directly from Sordalab, wich makes the price cheaper but I need to make it worth the postage. I also know SPD (north portugal as well) they sell many stuff (Pot Permanganate at 5€/kg with no questions asked). I know suppliers, but the problem is that they only sell 500g packages and above, I think I need to do that investment.That's unfortunate. Have you checked with Fototechnik Suvatlar or Bellini?
If you end up having to buy 500g of Potassium Bromide you will likely have a lifetime supply. One nice thing about that much Potassium Bromide is that it has a very good shelf life and will last you a very long time.Yes, I've also checked Disactis. My normal supplier is Silaba (north portugal, they sell everything, to anyone, from A. Dichromate, to fuming N. Acid and Catechol, and ship them by mail) they have lots of stuff but I now they sell stuff from SordaLab (France), I can buy directly from Sordalab, wich makes the price cheaper but I need to make it worth the postage. I also know SPD (north portugal as well) they sell many stuff (Pot Permanganate at 5€/kg with no questions asked). I know suppliers, but the problem is that they only sell 500g packages and above, I think I need to do that investment.
There are plenty of people with very extensive experience that think Ansco 130 gives them something they can't get from anything else.
In the fall I asked the question of what glycin adds to paper developer and the answer wasn't very definitive. nobody could say exactly what the difference was, if any.
interestingly, the discussion brought up "The great paper developer shootout" and in blind tests the prints developed in Ansco 130 were not the ones most liked. If glycin does something extra, most people don't like it.
Craig is it possible that Ansco 130 has come to the front as we've lost a lot of past beautiful papers?
PFormulary 130 is along with LPD my favourite paper developers. I do use the 5 liter containers of Ilford Multi grade for daily/normal work...since i can buy it in Calgary. I'm always trying for consistency so i don't graze among all the developers and choose not to mix my own. But I do prefer 130 & LPD for exhibition/sale prints
Hey everyone,
I’ve been thinking a lot about this lately, and I’m hoping to hear other printers’ experiences.
It feels like Ilford Multigrade FB (Classic / Warmtone) has become the only serious silver-gelatin enlarging paper that anyone uses anymore. Walk into any fine-art darkroom, talk to printers I know, check galleries, or read process write-ups… it’s Ilford MGFB across the board.
I get why: consistency, availability, archival behavior, etc. But I can’t help feeling like the paper just doesn’t have that “magic” quality that older papers had. There’s nothing wrong with Ilford MGFB, but there’s also nothing that makes me stop and marvel at it either.
When I look at older prints on papers like Oriental Seagull (the real stuff), or other classic 70s–90s emulsions, the surface just had this sparkle, the kind of depth and micro-contrast that made the blacks feel like velvet and the highlights almost shimmer. The textures were gorgeous and subtle.
By comparison, Ilford’s current glossy FB surface feels… a little dead? Flat? Lacking that micro-sheen? I find myself wishing for something that actually excites me again.
So I’m wondering:
• What are people doing now that the beautiful papers of the past are gone?
Are you coating prints with lacquer or gloss sprays to bring back some of that pop?
• Is there any paper on the market that’s truly notable besides Ilford?
Foma/Fomabrom, Adox MCC, MG Art 300 — do any of these really scratch the itch, or are we all settling?
• Has anyone moved to liquid emulsions or hand-coating their own papers?
If the commercial options are so limited, is DIY the future for people who want unique surfaces again?
• And bigger picture… when are we going to see NEW silver-gelatin papers?
Are any manufacturers actually working on something new? Or are we just going to be using the same handful of emulsions indefinitely?
I’d love to hear how people are dealing with the current landscape.
Are you happy with the available papers? Have you found workarounds? Or are you feeling the same sense of loss for those older, magical surfaces?
Looking forward to your thoughts.
I abandoned Iford a long time ago. At one point I printed mostly on Iford Gallerie and Oriental Seagull. (After a few printing sessions I permanently rejected Iford Multi-MGFB; its durable enough, but boring. Then I discovered Slavich graded papers. And now I am bewildered why more people do not print on Slavich (Bromportrait or Unibrom). Both papers have a lot of personality and are very robust. They are excellent graded papers that easily rival Iford Gallerie in terms of reliability, and at least in my view, exceed Gallerie in printing quality (highlights in amadol are striking). I print on Fomabrom III when I want a grade 4 paper. Slavich is available in essentially grades 2 & 3. Not sure if Fomabrom III grade 4 is still available. I have been drawing from a large frozen supply. Slavich is a little tricky to get at the moment. I read an email that someone sent to Michael Smith a number of years ago when Smith was pushing Lodima. It essentially asked, "Jeez Michael, have you seen prints on Slavich Bromportait?" (It's a chloro-bromo paper). Smith wrote back emphatically : "It's horrible!" I don't recall exactly his two or three word response, but this is close. In light of my own experience with Slavich I could only understand Smith's response as an clear endorsement. Weston liked chloro-bromo papers, too.
JMB, It's not clear where you live, but the two biggest retailers in N America, B&H & Freestyle haven't had Slavich paper in quite some time.....
At least it is currently produced.
Did you actually buy from Sordalab? Because I see some hard-to-find chemicals on their site, but their Sales Terms state:I can buy directly from Sordalab, wich makes the price cheaper but I need to make it worth the postage.
(we do not accept orders from private persons)Cas particulier : produits chimiques
Nous n’acceptons pas les commandes des particuliers concernant les produits chimiques.
Oh, oh! If that's true then somebody isn't going to be happy to hear that.Unfortunately, they don't produce paper anymore.
I live in California. And yes, you are correct Freestyle was the first to stop selling it, (but it was still easily available from B&H for a very long time thereafter), and it was still also freely available from Galaxy by direct order and from European and Russian retailers, too. Now B&H has stopped --not sure when, but I suspect more recently. I am actually not sure of its availability from European sources at the moment, but I think that it will eventually be available in the USA again when the politics are more favorable. I purchased two very large shipments of various sizes up to 20 x 24 inches about 5 years ago, and keep it frozen. If you are at all interested in the paper, please stay in touch. I plan to stay on top of this because as you can see from my post that at least in my view it is the best paper currently produced. At least it is currently produced.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?