When i can get it i really like Fomabrom Variant 111.
I'm still using all of them as I strip the emulsion off and recoat with my POP emulsionNowadays I use mostly Ilford MGWT. Luckily, I bought a good supply of it many years ago before the current price hikes. Regarding papers of the past, I used Dupont Varigam, Ilford Ilfomar, Ilford Ilfobrom, Oriental Seagull, and the Zone VI graded paper. All very nice papers, but I sometimes wonder if the characteristics ascribed to these papers, at least for myself, is because I printed a lot more back in those days. Perhaps I was a better darkroom worker, then?
Slavich was a nice graded single weight paper. I believe they still make holographic plates
Hey everyone,
I’ve been thinking a lot about this lately, and I’m hoping to hear other printers’ experiences.
It feels like Ilford Multigrade FB (Classic / Warmtone) has become the only serious silver-gelatin enlarging paper that anyone uses anymore. Walk into any fine-art darkroom, talk to printers I know, check galleries, or read process write-ups… it’s Ilford MGFB across the board.
I get why: consistency, availability, archival behavior, etc. But I can’t help feeling like the paper just doesn’t have that “magic” quality that older papers had. There’s nothing wrong with Ilford MGFB, but there’s also nothing that makes me stop and marvel at it either.
When I look at older prints on papers like Oriental Seagull (the real stuff), or other classic 70s–90s emulsions, the surface just had this sparkle, the kind of depth and micro-contrast that made the blacks feel like velvet and the highlights almost shimmer. The textures were gorgeous and subtle.
By comparison, Ilford’s current glossy FB surface feels… a little dead? Flat? Lacking that micro-sheen? I find myself wishing for something that actually excites me again.
So I’m wondering:
• What are people doing now that the beautiful papers of the past are gone?
Are you coating prints with lacquer or gloss sprays to bring back some of that pop?
• Is there any paper on the market that’s truly notable besides Ilford?
Foma/Fomabrom, Adox MCC, MG Art 300 — do any of these really scratch the itch, or are we all settling?
• Has anyone moved to liquid emulsions or hand-coating their own papers?
If the commercial options are so limited, is DIY the future for people who want unique surfaces again?
• And bigger picture… when are we going to see NEW silver-gelatin papers?
Are any manufacturers actually working on something new? Or are we just going to be using the same handful of emulsions indefinitely?
I’d love to hear how people are dealing with the current landscape.
Are you happy with the available papers? Have you found workarounds? Or are you feeling the same sense of loss for those older, magical surfaces?
Looking forward to your thoughts.
I don't think my photography and printing skills have yet reached the limits of what Ilford Multigrade FB can do. as soon as that happens; I'll look for other papers.
Has anyone succeeded in making Ilford MG or MGWT look more like a long-remembered paper by altering the paper developer? Maybe Ansco130?
I concur.
Has anyone succeeded in making Ilford MG or MGWT look more like a long-remembered paper by altering the paper developer? Maybe Ansco130?
So do I, but it’s not really the point. It was exciting - or at least fun - to try different printing papers. Their impact on the appearance of a photo was surprising. Although Ilford MG papers are incredibly flexible, they can’t cover for all those lost ‘looks’. But thank heavens that there is Ilford.
There’s more paper variety than even some camera stores recognize!
When I walked into Seattle’s largest camera store the other day and asked if they could order me some Ilford Cooltone, the (otherwise welcoming and friendly) chap behind the counter sneered and said they would ask their buyer if “Ilford would consider making such a product”.
I ordered a box from Freestyle on my phone before I left the building.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?