The Nova ones are some of the the most sensibly designed (plenum inlet at bottom, overflow into drainage compartment at top, textured spacers), but so they should be, given that they got input from Ilford on the rheology involved. Any of the washers based on fixer being heavier than water are based on a pretty major failure of understanding about what happens the moment even a small amount of turbulence/ agitation is introduced...
What matters is to the efficiency of wash is the water change rate, the amount of agitation and the compartmentalisation of each slot (so that you aren't continually re-contaminating partly washed prints.
Is a pump really necessary? Won't water pressure alone do the job? I have never seen an archival washer that requires a pump.I have installed a pump on a couple of my washers. Adopted a "dishwasher" approach. I fill the washer as usual, put rinsed prints in, turn on the pump and run it for 20-30 minutes repeat a couple times. This allows for vigorous, turbulent flow across the print. I use Kodak Hypo Clearing Agent after fix, then a brief minute or two rinse, then into the washer. Easier to keep water temperature around room temperature as well.
I've picked up color processor pumps when price was good. Had to rig power supplies. Pretty much any washer can be fitted with a pump.
View attachment 362951
I have the Nova Washmaster Eco and it works very well. The only negative for me is that the separators seem to bow after I drain the washer at the end of a session. It sometimes takes a few days for them to get back to their original shape. I've spoken to Nova and they told me that each separator is shaped by hand at the factory to fit a given washer slot and it's imperative that they are always placed in the slots for which they have been sized. I always ensure that but they still bow. I'm not entirely sure what causes this, but the only explanation I can come up with is that they expand a tiny bit after the washer has been drained (don't know why) and that causes them to be slightly wider than the distance between the two vertical slots holding them in the washer, and so they bow as a result. Not a big deal, they do always return to their original shape, but it's still a bit annoying. The only other thing is that they market it as a 5-slot washer but the 5th slot doesn't have a textured surface to agitate the wash water. You can also convert the rapid pre-wash slot to a 6th wash shot but it also doesn't have a textured surface. So, I treat it as a 4-slot washer which is generally good enough for my purposes. Shipping from the UK to the US is pretty expensive as well, but that's certainly no fault of Nova's.
Is a pump really necessary? Won't water pressure alone do the job? I have never seen an archival washer that requires a pump.
hat the capacity of some of them is a bit small
I have never needed a water pump either. The water flow will take care of that. Also one can use Hypo Clearing Agent to reduce the washing time and saving water.
You can say that again. I have a (since discontinued) single-slot 11x14 Nova washer!
Is a pump really necessary? Won't water pressure alone do the job? I have never seen an archival washer that requires a pump.
took me hours to get the protective film off the plexiglass dividers.
Howdy, so I’m going to be purchasing an archival print washer from Underredlight, who is now offering gravity drainage as well as overflow drainage. I’ve messaged back and forth with Oleksander (the maker of these) about the features of each, but I wanted to ask if anyone here has used either or both types, and what their preferences are/were? Any feedback is much appreciated
I have a 20x24 Gravity Works print washer sitting in the garage with the protective paper film on the dividers. I tried last summer when i got the washer to remove the paper and quickly realized that it was going to take some time to remove the covering. Maybe a project for the spring when the weather starts to warm up.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?