My baby Century Graphic with drop bed works fine at infinity with 47 f8 Super Angulon. Very nice @ 6X9.
Lots of depth of field, of course, but 5X Peak Lupe is handy.
Lots of depth of field, of course, but 5X Peak Lupe is handy.
How about the Graflex XL? I find it to be a very adaptable camera, especially for macro with the close-up spacers.
Funny. My 80/2.8 Planar (ex-Graflex XL) covers 2x3 and my 80/2.8 Xenotar (cleaned with steel wool, unusable but I tried it out anyway) doesn't. Schneider claims that the 80/2.8 Xenotar covers 91 mm.
Interesting. As you'd expect, I trust Schneider more than myself.That's wonderful. Photography is full of diverse experiences. I'd trust Dan Fromm before I'd trust Schneider. My Xenotar coverage testing consisted of scans 120 roll film with 6X9 roll back on Century, shot at infinity. As I disremember, XL body didn't allow the Planar to cover 6X9 even though the Graflok back and roll backs could handle 120 and 6X9.
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |
