I would be happy to help in any way, but I am not sure what I can do for you as I have never worked with Lippmann emulsions.
PE
Hey, thanks for everybody's input. Especially the holo links.
What factors go into successful developing, that is, how can you avoid shrinkage? (no jokes necessary....)
Is it temperature dependent, agitation, chemical, etc.? Lemme guess, all of the above! I wonder what the success rate is.
So here's a question... if you used mercury, would the shrinkage problem be minimized? Why must one use mercury? I guess it's because the mirror has to actually be in contact with the emulsion? So just sandwiching a mirror wouldn't work I suppose.
For what it's worth, making emulsions is way out of my league at the moment; I'll stick with the limitations of the available plates.
Lastly, could someone explain this sentence.... "The Slavich [PFG-03c] emulsion requires pre-development hardening in a formaldehyde solution." Is this the fogging that R Shaffer was referring to??
BTW: Lippmann plates can be projected, which to me seems like one of the most practical ways to display. It requires an aphengescope type projector (basically an opaque projector as far as I can tell). Here is a book link that describes it.... http://books.google.com/books?id=pq...=0CAYQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=aphengescope&f=false
As for formalin, sounds like it's time to start going door-to-door to mortuaries...
I know, thank you. It's not as funny though, as the idea of going around to mortuaries.
PE, I know there are some Lippmann's in Rochester, are you familiar with any elsewhere in the U.S.?
Sorry I made you ill
I guess I don't follow your question. Sorry.
If you mean people with that name, I guess I am not aware of any personally anywhere.
PE
I had not figured that this was about actual Lippmann color plates. Most museums have removed them due to the problems with the mercury. So, since they are not on display I would not know what they have in storage. I would assume that George Eastman House has some stored away but they probably will not display them.
PE
---
PS good luck with your (computer) recovery! Sounds like they should offer you a free year's subscription.
Would the pyro formula I have come across in several places be a colloidal developer? I could not decide if the GP-2 or pyro developer would give me the best chance of success.
Lastly, could someone explain this sentence.... "The Slavich [PFG-03c] emulsion requires pre-development hardening in a formaldehyde solution." Is this the fogging that R Shaffer was referring to??
BTW: Lippmann plates can be projected, which to me seems like one of the most practical ways to display. It requires an aphengescope type projector (basically an opaque projector as far as I can tell). Here is a book link that describes it.... http://books.google.com/books?id=pq...=0CAYQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=aphengescope&f=false
Yes they sure are few and far between!
As an article of photography for the enjoyment of the masses they fail almost every test.
The can have a nice "luminosity" if you will; sometimes almost like looking at reflector tape.
Lippmann plates cannot be copied and very few of them were made.PE
I assume you mean pyro + ammonia. Yes, since ammonia is an AgX solvent that would be a colloidal (or solution-physical) developer. The problem involved with is ammonia evaporation, which makes the solvent action of this developer very unreliable.
... I'll PM some photos. Bjelkhagen used a modified graphmatic film holder, which is pretty deep.
Can you post some pictures. I have in mind that an old Graflex film pack holder may be think enough. And since no one makes film packs any more they're basically useless.
Ripping the septums out of a Graphmatic seems kind of a waste if the pack film holder will work.
Just a though. But seeing your pics could help make it make sense.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?