- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
- Messages
- 29,832
- Format
- Hybrid
+1Send it to a lab…
for me its more than the water bath.. i don't want to deal with disposal or the nasty chemistry connected with color processing. I'll leave it to the professionalsAll you really need is a water bath and hot water.
All you really need is a water bath and hot water.
Regarding labs that process E-6, check these guys out. E-6 is all that they do.
https://www.agximaging.com/
I’m curious, what does the blix do? Is this the reversal part of the process?
Third time using the same mix of chemicals. Results were better this time, but now I think I see the effect of using the chemicals for several days: the result looks underexposed and a bit yellow. Is it primarily the first developer that needs to be used longer you think?
Is it normal to find fuzzy residue in the stabilizer immediately after developing E6? I was a bit shocked and thought the photo was ruined but it looks ok. Only difference from when the pros do it for me is…..perhaps…I think the image looks more “etched” as in Kodachrome. Very weird. Not sure if I can take a good photo of it.
I vaguely remember it with C41.
Modern C-41 needs no stabilizer (for film made after about 2000). E-6 stabilizer may still contain a small percentage of formaldehyde (or other aldehydes such as acetaldehyde) to ensure full conversion of the dyes. If diluted with tap water, this may react with something in the water to form flocks. As long as the film sheeted clean, I wouldn't worry about it.
Too little stirring of the tank?
Too little stirring of the tank?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?