Any Differences Between Zeiss Lenses on Hasselblads vs Rollei 6x6 Cameras?

[OAPOli]

@Alexander6x6 the original Zeiss Planar for Hasselblad used a 6/4 formula until 1962, with serial numbers under 4 000 000 and distinctive name ring. This was followed by the more common 7/5 lens. There is also the CB Planar in a 6/5 formula.

 

[itsdoable]

Zeiss Hasselbald had 3 versions of the 80mm Planar.

I can't follow you. The Planar's optical scheme has never been changed. There have only been improvements, including T* multicoating and, if I recall correctly, better characteristics for digital sensors.

There were 2 versions of the 7/5 Planar 2.8/80, there was a change in the optics somewhere between the C and CF versions. Early C versions have a larger front element than the CF versions. There was a later 6/5 C-Planar 2.8/80 made for the 501C kit. On film, I've not noticed any difference between them, except the improvements in the T* over time.

Zeiss Rollei lenses also used the first 2 versions.

 

[itsdoable]

OK! I think I got this wrong before, probably on this forum. OAPOIi is correct, the 1st version of the Hasselbald 2.8/80 was probably 6/4.

(from marcocavina.com)

Took me a while to dig this up - I had one of these earlier ones, and remember counting the reflections, thinking 7/5, but that was a long time ago and I probably got it wrong.

 

[Alexander6x6]

@Alexander6x6 the original Zeiss Planar for Hasselblad used a 6/4 formula until 1962, with serial numbers under 4 000 000 and distinctive name ring. This was followed by the more common 7/5 lens. There is also the CB Planar in a 6/5 formula.

Many thanks for interesting information.

 

[Pieter12]

The Schneider 80mm AF is a special design for the autofocus mechanism of the Rollei cameras (6008AF and Hy6).

Thee was also a MF Schneider 80mm f2.0 for the Rolleiflex 6000 series/Hy6

 

[isaac7]

There was also a great 80mm Schneider f2.8 made for the Exacta 66. I don’t know if it’s the same design as the others but it is a great lens.