Sirius Glass
Subscriber
Fixed that for you.
Thank you for that great catch.
Fixed that for you.
Companies that think I care about their political views are a total turn off for me no matter they are. I need some more 120 ISO and am buying Foma this batch.
Kent in SD
i
they dont CARE about the so called cause, merely that they are APPEARING to be on the bandwagon to ensure good appearance in social media.
i
tis an issue of the times, its also a basic fundamental flaw in business management courses and materials.
they dont CARE about the so called cause, merely that they are APPEARING to be on the bandwagon to ensure good appearance in social media.
You guys may as well close this thread if every second post is going to be deleted. It's impossible for people to discuss the topic of this post without bringing in their opinions and world view. Part of the point of publicizing support for Pride Month and all that's associated is calling into question the assumptions and attitudes that characterize society and are never challenged. So, if someone expresses such here, deleting it is not challenging it - it is looking the other way. And if you say this is not the place for such dialogue, then this thread should be deleted.
For clarity, if it wasn't for the fact that this thread is about a film photography company's public facing communications, it would have been closed long ago.
That's a good point....
I thought they were finally releasing a colored film.
Looking back at this, I am trying to remember when I was not aware of the rainbow flag and it's connection to LGBT+ pride.....and I suppose I must have been aware for more than 20 years. And I am not part of the LGBT+ community - though these days most of my friends are. By which I mean that sometime in the 90s when I became aware of it, it was not because I personally knew any people who fall in the LGBT+ categories. It was just common knowledge that pubs and businesses displaying the flag were gay pubs, or businesses specifically showing solidarity/friendliness towards what some now refer to as the queer community.....reclaiming a word that was once a slur
As for big businesses getting on a bandwagon....companies are often accused of this. But unless you hear from people who work for said companies, you don't necessarily know if they practise what they preach for one month of the year....or if they're just going after money. I've heard people criticise Tesco, Britain's biggest and the world's fourth biggest retailer for getting on this bandwagon when they have no queer credentials.....but several friends who have worked for them testify that they are possibly the most LGBT+ friendly employer on the planet. Unless you have some knowledge of their practises, you don't know if they get on a bandwagon for one month every year or actually put good practise in every day, every year.
So what matters here is how Ilford/Harman treat their LGBT+ staff and customers and how they've changed down the years. I don't know how many employees they have but you can bet that some are not fully cis-gendered and heterosexual. I also don't know how they feel working at Ilford/Harman...so I don't feel in any qualified to say that they're right or wrong to partake in pride month.
What I can say, as someone who is al ally of the queer community and tangentially involved, the appearance that Ilford/Harman notice and give a crap does make me feel that little better about them. But with the caveat that I don't know if their practises are sketchy behind the scenes.
If one is running a business or corporation correctly, then one does not have time to see with whom each employee is sleeping.
If one is running a business or corporation correctly, then one does not have time to see with whom each employee is sleeping.
I'm glad I caught this thread at this end, because I have no idea how things got to this level. My 2 cents on it, and keep in mind that I haven't read all this (but the cat could figure it out) is that I go to political sites for political reasons. And I go to photography sites for photography reasons. It's not a good idea to mix them together.
While I do appreciate this is a photography forum, "I don't do politics" is rather a privileged position to be in....because it does generally mean one is not affected by any of the issues being discussed....
So since we were originally discussing Ilford's pride rainbow advert *last year*....has anyone asked the fellow from Ilford/Harman who sometimes has a presence here if they have genuine corporate LGBT+ credentials or if it's just marketing for the "pink pound"?
While I do appreciate this is a photography forum, "I don't do politics" is rather a privileged position to be in....because it does generally mean one is not affected by any of the issues being discussed....
...
You run a business where your employees feel free and welcome to be themselves....where nobody who is LGBTQ+ feels any need to hide their identity. Where they feel welcome to discuss their partner(s) at with colleagues just like those who are in conventional marriages with 2.4 kids and picket fences. You support those who are from sectors of society who have been marginalised. All of which is not something always visible from the outside. It is only when one embeds in an organisation that it becomes clear if they're serious about equality or paying lip service.
If you don't care about the health and wellness of your employees, about how they deal with each other, and about how the people outside your business treat your employees, you shouldn't expect to be running that business for much longer.
You also will of course, provide lots of work for lawyers.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |