E. von Hoegh
Allowing Ads
No, that was the first one.
The latest is : https://twitter.com/KodakProFilmBiz/status/966311972731056128
"Do you even push? "
Whose response to it are you referring to?Chumming the bait line.
Personally I hope it's something that, if it's not useful to me, will at least contribute to Kodak's continuing production of film.
But this type of marketing as well as the response to it (like over-sugared five year olds at a piñata) is pretty disgusting.
The responses here, tw!tt3r, other film oriented websites, etc. etc; everywhere I looked, until I stopped looking. No one person is singled out, it's more along the lines of the stuff one reads about in this book - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraordinary_Popular_Delusions_and_the_Madness_of_CrowdsWhose response to it are you referring to?
Well, I don't particularly care to be likened to a hyperactive child for simply offering up a speculation. Half the responses here are made by people trying to exercise their grey matter about a puzzle given a few clues. Solving a riddle as it were. I see no harm in this activity- quite the opposite!The responses here, tw!tt3r, other film oriented websites, etc. etc; everywhere I looked, until I stopped looking. No one person is singled out, it's more along the lines of the stuff one reads about in this book - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraordinary_Popular_Delusions_and_the_Madness_of_Crowds
I'm not speaking of individuals, as I said above.Well, I don't particularly care to be likened to a hyperactive child for simply offering up a speculation. Half the responses here are made by people trying to exercise their grey matter about a puzzle given a few clues. Solving a riddle as it were. I see no harm in this activity- quite the opposite!
All true, but I think in this case it's just (mostly) people having fun harmlessly speculating, wishing, and joking around. At least that's how it looks to me on Photrio. No idea what's going on elsewhere on the web in relation to this.
Whoa! Do they have to pay Mr. Bolt and for the rights to use that footage?! Can't be worth the cost ... Only a dedicated film audience is going to care about their film release. I doubt Bolt's image would make much difference in this regard.So they posted a B&W .gif of Usain Bolt in the field.
https://twitter.com/KodakProFilmBiz/status/966372512379621379
We just need TMZ to report TMZ is back.
I think it is just a metaphor for fast. Maybe a nod to black and white, though that would be inconsistent with their first photo, which was a wedding in color, so I'm dubious about that.Whoa! Do they have to pay Mr. Bolt and for the rights to use that footage?! Can't be worth the cost ... Only a dedicated film audience is going to care about their film release. I doubt Bolt's image would make much difference in this regard.
I think it is just a metaphor for fast. Maybe a nod to black and white, though that would be inconsistent with their first photo, which was a wedding in color, so I'm dubious about that.
I don' think you have to pay Ursain Bolt to show footage of him running in a race. Presumably, they paid the owner of the footage, but they may have overlooked that detail.I get the metaphor. I don't understand spending dough to Mr. Bolt and the owner of the footage for a fairly lame, but amusing twitter marketing strategy.
Well, I don't particularly care to be likened collectively to a hyperactive child for simply offering up a speculation.I'm not speaking of individuals, as I said above.
The type of marketing, one teaser after the other, the use of social media, the group response, that is the phenomenon I see.
I have had virtually no exposure to how these things travel and grow on the web so when I look closely at it, as I have this, it's a bit shocking.
The individuals are all over a continuum of response from disinterest to simply stated interest to interested in the return of their favorite extinct product to wild speculation bordering on frantic, all based on marketing hype, and not very high-powered hype at that.
I enjoy solving a puzzle too, but there isn't much to work with here.
I wish I was smart enough to think that thought!I am beginning to believe that this is marketing to distract the market that Ektachrome ain't coming back. ...
I don't see the demand for a high speed color product. Fuji has been discontinuing its high speed products, undoubtedly due to lack of demand. ISO 400 is more than adequate for everything I do. Is it just that photographers have become used to shooting at high ISO with digital and think they need something comparable for film? Or has Kodak just decided it will fill the niche vacuum left by Fuji?
I shoot most of my MF on a tripod, and rarely use an ISO 400 film.If you shoot medium format, often your lenses open up to all of f/3.5 or f/4.5. High speed film would be very much appreciated.
I will start buying cases of the film.
I shoot most of my MF on a tripod, and rarely use an ISO 400 film.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?