X100 and x400 are agfa avicolor films in sizes 70mm, 126mm and 240mm
now i see x100 is discontinued.
http://www.agfa.com/sp/global/en/in...services/all_products/aviphotcolor_chrome.jsp
special about these films is: no mask, most ideal for scanning and b+w pictures. and special filter built-in to get good greens.
x100 was very contrasty for higher altitude.
x400 is sharp enough, i have used n400 for aerial shooting. avicolor films are said to be very good for push and pull-processing.
datasheet:
http://www.agfa.com/sp/global/en/binaries/AVIPHOT COLOR X400_tcm611-42589.pdf
i once made a big mistake using kodak vericolor III for aerial shooting. that film is matching greens very badly.....
and i also made a big mistake in pulling kodak vericolor HC.
reason was i checked contact copies made on bubblejet copier which produce very contrasty results. now i am cured about this.
n400 used here: fantastic rendering and supersharp
http://www.stereopan.tk or the other version here
www.3dreal.ch
now i see x100 is discontinued.
http://www.agfa.com/sp/global/en/in...services/all_products/aviphotcolor_chrome.jsp
special about these films is: no mask, most ideal for scanning and b+w pictures. and special filter built-in to get good greens.
x100 was very contrasty for higher altitude.
x400 is sharp enough, i have used n400 for aerial shooting. avicolor films are said to be very good for push and pull-processing.
datasheet:
http://www.agfa.com/sp/global/en/binaries/AVIPHOT COLOR X400_tcm611-42589.pdf
i once made a big mistake using kodak vericolor III for aerial shooting. that film is matching greens very badly.....
and i also made a big mistake in pulling kodak vericolor HC.
reason was i checked contact copies made on bubblejet copier which produce very contrasty results. now i am cured about this.
n400 used here: fantastic rendering and supersharp
http://www.stereopan.tk or the other version here
www.3dreal.ch

