• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

After building up a solid gear collection...(Leica M & R)

Horicon Marsh-2

A
Horicon Marsh-2

  • 0
  • 0
  • 22
Back Room

A
Back Room

  • 3
  • 0
  • 69

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
201,131
Messages
2,819,564
Members
100,548
Latest member
toppercalculator
Recent bookmarks
0

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,557
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
I have a 2.8/135 for R.

The only "fast" lens would be the Leica SUMMILUX-R 1,4/80mm (11880). We are talking 1400-2000 EUR.
Well, the 2.0/90 Summicron (11219) is also fast(er) than a 2.8 and around 500 EUR.
You think I need another 90mm?

I was thinking fast, short-er tele for the M. Something like a 75... I forget what all the options are. If you're looking for something for the R, if the 2.0/90 would be reasonable in price, I'd get it and drop the various 90s you have for the M system.
 

GregY

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
3,874
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format
Maybe 35 and 50 are good enough for a RF?

As mentioned, only you can decide. If not using MF, I reach for the raingefinder.... i have 21,28,35,40,50,90....in the drawer but i very often travel with only 1.

(Tokyo after a ski trip w just the 21)
40669418012_8f8fb7dbf9_c.jpg
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,701
Format
35mm RF
Why not sell them and by a house?
 

chuckroast

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Messages
2,959
Location
All Over The Place
Format
Multi Format
As mentioned, only you can decide. If not using MF, I reach for the raingefinder.... i have 21,28,35,40,50,90....in the drawer but i very often travel with only 1.

(Tokyo after a ski trip w just the 21)
40669418012_8f8fb7dbf9_c.jpg

I have all those but the 28mm and 40mm. I cannot convince myself that the 28 is different enough from the 35mm to justify owning one (and having to deal with a finder, since the newest body I have is an M5). Ditto the 40mm vs. a 50mm.

Like you, I have an embarrassment of riches and try to pare down what I carry at any given moment to things I will actually use. My least used lens is a 90mm f/2.8 Elmarit-M but I don't know why that is.

Like you, I love that 21 beyond words.
 

chuckroast

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Messages
2,959
Location
All Over The Place
Format
Multi Format
Maybe 35 and 50 are good enough for a RF?

You can test this yourself. Shoot a whole week with only the 35. Then repeat with the 50mm. Think about what shots you missed or who have liked to have a different lens for. You may be surprised.

I find that once I am in the rhythm of shooting with a 35mm camera, I tend not to change lenses for the rest of the day, or change very infrequently. Maintaining the rhythm of shooting is more important to me than finding the perfect lens for each shot.
 

GregY

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
3,874
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format
I have all those but the 28mm and 40mm. I cannot convince myself that the 28 is different enough from the 35mm to justify owning one (and having to deal with a finder, since the newest body I have is an M5). Ditto the 40mm vs. a 50mm.

Like you, I have an embarrassment of riches and try to pare down what I carry at any given moment to things I will actually use. My least used lens is a 90mm f/2.8 Elmarit-M but I don't know why that is.

Like you, I love that 21 beyond words.

CR, the 40 & 90 came along with a CL as a gift. The 28 by happenstance when i needed an LTM lens...tiny & at the time inexpensive. I've come to see that the 28mm is sufficiently different than the 35. The 50 & 90 only get occasional use....
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

RezaLoghme

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 6, 2024
Messages
1,386
Location
Europe
Format
Medium Format
There’s something quietly magical about rangefinder cameras, especially when I think back to the early 1990s. In that era, Leica offered the M6 as a standard, almost humble tool in their lineup, even as the R8 and R9 pushed the boundaries of technical innovation. The M6 felt like a melancholic artefact of the past - simple, deliberate, and utterly present -- reminding the photographer that composition is an act of attention, not of convenience.

This duality....between tradition and innovation....was not unique to cameras. Revox still produced the B77 reel-to-reel tape recorder while embracing the CD player. Jaguar carried on with the Daimler Double Six Series 3, its lineage stretching back to the late 1960s, even as BMW and Mercedes experimented with early navigation systems. Rolex offered the rare 16520 chronograph, a niche masterpiece within a range of modernized watches. Across industries, these objects embodied a balance: honoring the past while tentatively exploring the future.

For me, shooting a rangefinder is a meditation on that balance. There is no autofocus, no digital review, no menu labyrint...only the quiet, precise act of framing and capturing light. Each shot demands patience and presence, and in return, it offers a depth that faster, flashier systems rarely achieve. The rangefinder teaches you to slow down, to notice the interplay of shadow and form, to respect the craft.

Ultimately, the M6 and its peers are more than tools : they are objects that carry memory, craftsmanship, and a subtle defiance of obsolescence. In an age of relentless technological acceleration, they remind us that some things are worth preserving for the clarity, the thought, and the simple pleasure of doing them well.

And the 1990s...what an era!
 
OP
OP

RezaLoghme

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 6, 2024
Messages
1,386
Location
Europe
Format
Medium Format
GAS (Gear Acquisition Syndrome) is deceptively easy. Most of the time, acquiring equipment isn’t a question of difficulty; when buying pre-owned, almost anything is within reach, either immediately or after a period of saving. Spending isn’t the real challenge.....saving isn’t either. The real test is restraint.

To deliberately say “no,” to limit yourself to “one camera, one lens,” requires a kind of willpower that money cannot buy. It is a conscious decision to let limitations shape your creativity, to focus not on what you might possess, but on what you can do with what you already have. This discipline is quietly transformative: it forces attention, cultivates patience, and turns the act of photography into something more than accumulation... i t becomes a practice of intention, presence, and refinement.

In a world where acquiring gear is only a matter of time and resources, the hardest shots are often not the ones captured on film, but the ones resisted at the store or in the catalog.

Saying “no” is its own art.

Just say no.
 
Last edited:
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom