The density is so low already on these ones so I don't know if that is really worthwhile? We are talking about sub 0.1 log density. How much does that shift affect to contrast and ISO analysis?
I'm not claiming that we are talking about professional level devices here but maybe very decent for hobbyist?
This is great for what it is, and extremely educational too. Just think, you probably know more now than you did when you first started working on it. That alone makes it worth it, and sharing it here for others to see is just gravy.
Time to get to ASA parameters may be 13:15
Time for Zone System N may be 10:30
Haa yes. That’s process control. You can do it any time you want
You fought it all the way, but you finally have what looks like a film curve.
I changed the exposure scheme a bit to one Bill suggested; making two strips. One for the lower part of 18%/ZoneV and one for the upper part. So in total I got 31 steps. I exposed with half stop difference / 0.15 log. In total the exposure is now 16 stops or 4.8 log.
Also I changed the lux-second calculation to use 8 / ISO (instead of 10/ISO).
I ended up with this kind of data:
View attachment 299956
Toe:
View attachment 299957
My scanner seem to have troubles with the most dense part:
View attachment 299958
Looks good. Just looking at the chart you posted, it looks like you have about 0.2 log lux seconds of exposure in density below about 0.1 density before things peter out and just stops responding to light. Nice.
Edit: messed up milliseconds / seconds.
Adrian I cannot still wrap my head around with this, can you explain how you came up with that number?
In your graph (below), FB+F is sitting at ~0.35 density, which puts the speed point (which is 0.1 above FB+F) at ~0.45 density. At ~0.45 density, you're at ~-3.0 (closer to -0.2975, but we'll round to -0.3) log lux-seconds and you hit film base plus fog at ~-3.2 log lux-seconds, which is ~0.2 log lux seconds of exposure sitting down below the speed point. 0.2 log lux seconds is 2/3rds of a stop of exposure. It's very low contrast (about 0.50 gamma) and not that usable if printing in the darkroom (meaning I wouldn't normally be exposing things so that shadow detail I cared about what down in there), but if going a hybrid approach, can be stretched out from the 0.1 amount of density it's using to 0.2 density.
And what do you mean by hybrid approach?
Why anyone would like to use that area for shadows?
Normally you wouldn't, but if shooting in really low light or at night, its helpful to know how much is going to register so you can add development time to try to bring it up if you need to. It's more about having that information about how the film responds so in the event you end up in a less than ideal situation, you know what you can reliably get, and what you can squeeze out if you have to.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?