Something is very wrong in manufacturing and economically, when you can scrape a much better “scanner” together by buying off the shelf products made for some different purpose , than by buying a professionally produced scanner for at least 10x the price.
One minute of macro taking and five minutes of stitching and tweaking, kills OpticFilm 120s almost two hour scan time for a 6x6 for a measly 5300 dpi, in every possible way.
Resolution, tonality and dynamics.
At 5300 dpi you need a 112 MPixel camera to beat the resolution...One minute of macro taking and five minutes of stitching and tweaking, kills OpticFilm 120s almost two hour scan time for a 6x6 for a measly 5300 dpi, in every possible way.
Resolution, tonality and dynamics.
I doubt they are even making them anymore. They could just be selling out of an end of production run.There's nothing wrong at all as it fills a need and makes a profit.
Obvbiously we have several options available here commercially, from simple cheap flatbeds to using expensive camera's and lenses.
So each can skin their cat in a way that suits them best.
As long as the end result pleases the user it's all good.
All you need is a good APS sensor camera. Four snaps of a 6x6 with some overlap and you are there.At 5300 dpi you need a 112 MPixel camera to beat the resolution...
I doubt they are even making them anymore. They could just be selling out of an end of production run.
The few people buying them are the ones who are too narrow minded/naive/lacking in knowledge to know about and understand camera scanning.
Thinking “a real scanner is better” or “it doesn’t make sense to digitally photograph film”.
They are dwindling fast in number though.
A $2500 price tag vs. a few hundred with much better value for the money, is real convincing to most people.
Amateur straw man building is getting old real fast. You’re a quarter to twelve, invoking Godwin's law in the above.Pretty narrow minded viewpoint.
But you do what makes you happy.
I have no illusions about how my scans will be viewed by the majority who sees them, anything from lousy monitors to cellphones.
So I let my scanner hum away and do 12 images per batch while I do something more interesting. Works for me.
Interesting how some camera scanner folks come across as both a bit militant and arrogant at the same time tho.
That's a lot of negative energy inserted in to a largely positive hobby.
Amateur straw man building is getting old real fast. You’re a quarter to twelve, invoking Godwin's law in the above.
When you see people proudly driving three wheelers they bought for more money than a very good racing bike would cost them. You have to at least say something.
It’s a basic humanitarian act.
And the set it and forget it argument is moot when the scanner takes two hours to do a scan it would take minutes to do with a camera.
If you are happy with a simple 24 MP scan, you can do that in literally a second with a camera scan setup.
Look at it this way, an enlarger is basically this thing. You’re only projecting on a sensor.[1] I want a scanner simply because quality camera scans are expensive, the copy stand takes half of my desk, and it just... "feels wrong".
Which would be fine, if both positive and negative materials matched in how the colours are put together, and if all the different brands and types of colour materials behaved exactly the same.You want three "peaks" that align with peak sensitivity of each emulsion layer
I'd love to hear what those reports say and pertaining which post(s).We have received reports about some of the lack of civility in this thread.
It is fine to advocate for a position, but rude and dismissive comments about other people will get the thread shut down.
What can we do to bring them back? (peition.org, fund raising, something like kickstarter?). Thank you.
Asking another question: Given that Noritsu, Fuji and Nikon seems to be the best scanners and they are already very old with many issues for sourcing parts and repair them, what would be required for the Japanese to make new hardware with compatible drivers for current oses? How much money will be required for them to restart making them? What can we do to bring them back? (peition.org, fund raising, something like kickstarter?). Thank you.
@Les Sarile why are you posting this again? IIRC people have told you several times that you're comparing two different operators clicking on different buttons in two different software packages. None of that has anything to do with scanners. You are simply not an expert in Noritsu EZ controller. You are clueless about camera scanning also. All of your posts should be simply re-written as "I have a Coolscan"s.
You have no idea.
You bombed this thread without helping the OP at all.Congratulations. You have wasted a lot of time and money. Should have tried reading manuals or books on image processing before you started "comparing" and sharing online.
Electronic flash.Deep breath. I was looking at using a digital camera for "scanning" my Beseler Negatrans looks like it would transport my medium format film ( sittingon top of a light source) . What's the best light source
+1Electronic flash.
Yeah, that's about as good as it gets. I've got plenty of flash units. I could rig up a monolight. Are the fancy Negative Supply carriers worth the money? They look beautiful but I'm not sure if I would get much benefit.Electronic flash.
Are the fancy Negative Supply carriers worth the money
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?