A big blow to film production at Kodak and Fuji

Frank Dean,  Blacksmith

A
Frank Dean, Blacksmith

  • 8
  • 5
  • 73
Woman wearing shades.

Woman wearing shades.

  • 1
  • 1
  • 80
Curved Wall

A
Curved Wall

  • 6
  • 0
  • 92
Crossing beams

A
Crossing beams

  • 10
  • 1
  • 115
Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 5
  • 1
  • 86

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,842
Messages
2,781,733
Members
99,725
Latest member
saint_otrott
Recent bookmarks
0
OP
OP
Photo Engineer

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Please, PLEASE, just tell me a good story!

Read a book!

Some very good books are being written but sales are going down due to the fact that most people love to see a dull movie remake!

BTW, sales of books about magic and the occult are going upward. Maybe something is really wrong here.

PE
 

eddym

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
1,924
Location
Puerto Rico
Format
Multi Format
Read a book!

Some very good books are being written but sales are going down due to the fact that most people love to see a dull movie remake!

BTW, sales of books about magic and the occult are going upward. Maybe something is really wrong here.

PE

I'm ordering Stephen Hawking's new book, "The Grand Design". Can't wait to read about his "M-theory", with "11 space-time dimensions, vibrating strings, point particles, two-dimensional membranes, three-dimensional blobs, and other objects that are more difficult to picture and occupy even more dimensions of space."
Sounds pretty cool to me! :smile:
 

lxdude

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
7,094
Location
Redlands, So
Format
Multi Format
BTW, sales of books about magic and the occult are going upward. Maybe something is really wrong here.

PE

Hey, if one of them can show me how to conjure Kodachrome in a crockpot I'm interested! But it had better show me how to turn it into a finished slide...no scratches or funny color, either!

That's me..crackpot with a crockpot. But if it works I'll be rich, at least as rich as Kodak!

Oh.
Uhhmm....:blink:
 
OP
OP
Photo Engineer

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
I'm ordering Stephen Hawking's new book, "The Grand Design". Can't wait to read about his "M-theory", with "11 space-time dimensions, vibrating strings, point particles, two-dimensional membranes, three-dimensional blobs, and other objects that are more difficult to picture and occupy even more dimensions of space."
Sounds pretty cool to me! :smile:

"His M-theory"?

That has been the subject of many articles before Hawking and Ed Witten has been giving talks on 11 space for years. :wink: You don't read enough! :D

Hawking had to retract his biggest theory, and now he proposes a universe without God. Someone may take a Fatwa out on him! :sad:

PE
 
OP
OP
Photo Engineer

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Hey, if one of them can show me how to conjure Kodachrome in a crockpot I'm interested! But it had better show me how to turn it into a finished slide...no scratches or funny color, either!

That's me..crackpot with a crockpot. But if it works I'll be rich, at least as rich as Kodak!

Oh.
Uhhmm....:blink:

Yeah, Kodak rich? Nowdays that is a real oxymoron or something!

PE
 

jvo

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 6, 2008
Messages
1,751
Location
left coast of east coast
Format
Digital
most digital photography is done by sloppy shooters... once you get behind photoshop and start manipulating your image, it takes as long as it would in the darkroom, (sometimes longer when you factor in the lousy digital image people start with). The only difference is ones a "dry" process and one isn't.

film will die, who knows when or how? soon? maybe... and it will come in a way no one predicted but by a combination of factors.

our job is to use, encourage, and teach and it will be around a bit longer that we think!
 

lxdude

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
7,094
Location
Redlands, So
Format
Multi Format
Yeah, Kodak rich? Nowdays that is a real oxymoron or something!

PE

I'll be any kind of moron if it'll make me rich!

Or even provide a steady income.:pouty:
 
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
59
Format
Multi Format
this sounds like we're due for another rate increase at the hands of multi-national companies that will tell us 'as demand drops, prices will increase'. What horror. what shit. But that is ALOT of dye and emulsion that is going to sit in a warehouse. Maybe we'll get access as consumers to some new emulsions as they try to figure out what to do with it all. :smile: Hopefully they'll find a way to re-use any surplus without just passing the costs on to us.
 
OP
OP
Photo Engineer

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
You cannot reuse or "rescue" outdated or surplus film or paper. It is essentially scrap. Look at it from the aspect of a butcher shop. What do they do with meats that have gone beyond the expiration date and are now bad?

PE
 

lxdude

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
7,094
Location
Redlands, So
Format
Multi Format
^^^I think they sell them to school districts.:sick:
 

fotch

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2005
Messages
4,774
Location
SE WI- USA
Format
Multi Format
You cannot reuse or "rescue" outdated or surplus film or paper. It is essentially scrap. Look at it from the aspect of a butcher shop. What do they do with meats that have gone beyond the expiration date and are now bad?

PE
Don't the add dye and re-label the date "use by"?
 

Prest_400

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
1,438
Location
Sweden
Format
Med. Format RF
Well, then, you're going to keel over in your chair when you read this!

http://gizmodo.com/5614433/this-is-the-first-imax-3d-porn-movie-yes-imax-3d-porn

Yes, folks! It's a porno movie in 3-D! IMAX 3-D, no less!
Bouncing boobs and male members, 20 feet tall and floating just inches in front of your face!

It's a must see!

:D

If I'm not mistaken, IMAX 3D is a film process. :munch::munch::munch:

You reminded me of a interview to a Director in TV, he is strabismic and the interviewed asked him about 3D, he said:
"Oh, yes, I cannot see it. I remember my first 3D experience, it was on a playboy magazine. It advertised 3D content and included the glasses. My friend tried it first, he said it was awesome. Immediately I put the glasses and when I looked on the magazine, "oh, what a crap".
But, it's quite interesting when I began experimentation with cinemascope. Other directors were baffled by this, but I have an advantage".
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,263
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
The last time Kodak saw a big down turn in a product range they just closed their production entirely. That was B&W papers.

It's extremely difficult for a company the size of Kodak to downsize further, their corporate management still has illusions that the company is a major force, the only real asset is the name now not the products (apart from the film division which has it's niche market).

No doubt someone knowledgeable will write factually about Kodak's decline in the next year or so, most people outside the US think that Fuji has had a better understanding of the market for many years.

It's interesting looking back at Kodak & Fuji advertising from the mid 50's onwards. Fuji were selling state of the art 35mm cameras and Kodak unbelievably still selling Box Brownies and then Brownie 127's, Kodak Bantam Colorsnap's taking 828 film etc/

Looking at pre WWII research Kodak were good when it came to films and especially colour, but their B&W developer research was a joke, it took them over 14 years to get from D76 to D23/D25, and then DK20 and later Microdol. It wasn't until the introduction of products like HC110 and later Xtol that Kodak actually took the lead in B&W developers

In comparison in the late 20's early 30's smaller companies were making far larger advances with B&W developers, Edwal, Johnsons, Perutz, Tetenal, Ilford etc.

Kodak & the Box Brownie was the 1890's-1900 equivalent of the VW Beetle, the peoples camera, but as people got more sophisticated Kodak still wanted to sell down market still with the box Brownie and by the 50's-60's first with 127 and later 126 which was 828 in a cartridge, then 110 and finally the disc camera. Both 110 and the disc camera based on selling less film at much the same price but with a far higher profit margins, however the image quality was poor usually due to camera shake as they were just too small & light.

This shows a company through the 40's, 50's, 60's very lost with poor leadership, they make the worlds leading colour film, Kodachrome, and at the same time sell Box brownies, they were trying to be too many things to too many people. However they were enormously profitable selling film for other manufacturers cameras, and materials to process & print those films

The roots of Kodak's current problems were sown many years ago.

Ian
 
OP
OP
Photo Engineer

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Ian;

Today, Kodak sells P&S single use cameras. All in all, the Box Brownies and Instamatics and other "small" cameras including the P&S cameras of today outsold and continue to outsell all others and continue to grow slightly in sales right now. Not much, but by a small margin. And, Fuji sells them as well today. They did not at first because Kodak had the patents on the best stamped plastic lenses. Bad decision? I think not!

As for developers, D76 was the standby in the market for years. The attitude at EK was "why compete with yourself?", especially when Kodak had Versatol which you didn't mention and which was replaced by HC-110 finally when the time was right. Kodak had the best hardening fix on the market for years, and still sells it! And, formulas for all B&W chemistry that were under development when the B&W R&D was stopped would have surprised you.

Kodak also had the Tri-Chem pack for home photographers, and the complete "How To" set of books in two sets and published over nearly 50 years. No other company can match that single contribution. My library contains both sets in many many hard cover volumes.

At 20B USD / year income in the 80s, I would not say that they had poor leadership. Yes, quite a few bad decisions were made, but you don't make that kind of money by making a lot of bad decisions or doing bad R&D. If the films were not of the highest quality, Fuji would have taken over the total market. I guarantee it! And, talking to Fuji people, you hear their voice in this and it says that they are worried. Dr. Hirozo Ueda, VP and Director of Research at Fuji told me that he was probably getting an ulcer worrying about digital. He said that he felt ill every time he went by a Sony sign or a Toshiba sign!

And, in the field of photography, many of the smaller companies were duplicating Kodak work, (eg. ID-11 vs D-76) or the color Tetenal kits with avoidance of Kodak and Fuji patents of course. Or, they waited until relevant patents expired. You seem to forget that many of these items came from Kodak first.

Oh, and the year Kodak discontinued paper products, Ilford was faltering and Agfa failed. Bad management? IDK. I hate to cast a stone, but Ilford recovered wonderfully due to a great product line, and Kodak held its own in film due to the same reasons. So, if you cast any stones, it must be broadcast across the industry, not just Kodak management.

I have spoken personally to VPs, Presidents and CEOs of 6 major photo companies, including Kodak. I would not say any of them was incompetent. They, just as their companies, were victims of circumstances surrounding digital and the WW economy.

Your response was too shallow and too narrow to tell the full story. Sorry.

PE
 

lxdude

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
7,094
Location
Redlands, So
Format
Multi Format

lxdude

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
7,094
Location
Redlands, So
Format
Multi Format
You cannot reuse or "rescue" outdated or surplus film or paper.

PE

Hey I saw on the internet (so it's gotta be true!) that they pay little kids in the third world to scrape off the emulsion and make it into Jell-o., which they then sell to them.

:wink:
 
OP
OP
Photo Engineer

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
From June 25th WSG:

"In March, Kodak's movie-film business, which had remained relatively steady
even as camera film sales plunged, suffered a new blow when three big movie
theater chains secured financing to convert 14,000 movie screens to digital
projection by 2013. The funding is expected to accelerate the digital distribution
of movies, giving Kodak less time to adapt to the long-anticipated decline in its
film cash cow."

A. Perez, in an interview.
 

Curt

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
4,618
Location
Pacific Nort
Format
Multi Format
At what anniversary will Kodak give out a free digital camera to every 12-year-old throughout the country? Inquiring minds want to know. :wizard:


Giveaway camera found readily for sale
By Terry Maurer, What's it worth
Merchandise giveaways have become pretty common in modern business. There are two-for-one specials at department stores and after-purchase rebates on everything from cell phones to wine.

Sometimes you can even get things free.

We may think of these marketing tactics as modern, but they're not.

In today's What's it Worth, a reader asks about her camera, part of one of the first huge promotions of this kind in 1930.

Q. My father gave me this camera a few months ago. He said on Kodak's 50th anniversary, the company gave a camera to 12-year-olds throughout the country and this is the camera they gave him. It appears to be in good shape. The shutter works well, but the viewing glass is cloudy. It has a gold seal on the side depicting Kodak's 50th anniversary. My father did not say much more about it. I don't know if it is worth much, but it is priceless to me.

-- Jane in Richland

A. Kodak is, of course, one of the most famous names in American business. Founded in the late 1800s by a buggy whip salesman and a bank clerk, the company's innovative products soon made it an international photography phenomenon. Producing cameras, film, accessories, lenses and just about anything you'd want or need to make pictures, Kodak had production plants all over the world. Each location made its own cameras for its own market, so collectors find all kinds of variations.

In 1930, Kodak celebrated 50 years in business in a big way. They decided to give a free camera to every 12-year-old in the United States and Canada. Kodak was going to give away 550,000 special cameras -- complete kits with box camera, film, instruction manual and a note from company leader George Eastman.

The widely advertised promotion that was featured in the company's magazine "Kodakery" and announced by first lady Grace Coolidge had two purposes. One was to celebrate the golden anniversary. The other was to get huge numbers of youngsters interested in photography. Kodak always believed they'd make much more money selling roll after roll of film than they would selling cameras.

All a family had to do to get their camera was stop in at a Kodak retailer and ask for one, demonstrating the child was or would be 12 years of age in 1930. The promotion started May 1 and it seems all the more than half-million cameras were gone within about a week.

The camera is a special edition of the "Rainbow Hawkeye" model, with that gold seal on the side. This was a stripped-down version, with one lens, using 120 film. In good condition, they still take pictures today and the film is readily available.

As a collectible, these are of interest to camera fans and there are lots of them for sale in shops and on the Internet. What's rare is that Jane doesn't seem to have the original box. The camera and the other giveaway parts were packaged in an Art Deco-design cardboard box that's seldom found today.

The camera itself ranges in price from $25 upwards and we have seen one offered by a Seattle camera shop for more than $100. Add about 50 percent to any price if the box is still there.

Q. I hope you can give me some information on a serving tray that has a glass top and print underneath. I haven't been able to find out about the print, which shows a family group in fancy dress in an outdoor setting. We think my mother bought the tray at a thrift shop in Winnemucca, Nev., years ago. Thanks.

-- Candyce in Dayton

A. We were able to examine this white tray in person and found the print to be just that, something produced on a printing press. It may have been cut to size to fit the oval opening in the matt. The gilded decoration is uneven and was applied by hand -- perhaps as a craft project.

The print is quite attractive but we don't know which original work of art is the basis for the scene. From the clothing, the family dates from the 1700s or early 1800s. But the tray itself was probably made in the 1920s or 1930s.

There'll be some interest in this, especially among those who like to decorate in the "shabby chic" style. The value isn't high -- in the $25 to $35 range.



Read more: http://www.tri-cityherald.com/2008/09/21/324341/giveaway-camera-found-readily.html#ixzz0ynGgTxEe
 

CGW

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Messages
2,896
Format
Medium Format
From June 25th WSG:

"In March, Kodak's movie-film business, which had remained relatively steady
even as camera film sales plunged, suffered a new blow when three big movie
theater chains secured financing to convert 14,000 movie screens to digital
projection by 2013. The funding is expected to accelerate the digital distribution
of movies, giving Kodak less time to adapt to the long-anticipated decline in its
film cash cow."

A. Perez, in an interview.

FYI, this is a way bigger worry, PE:

http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/03/freakonomics-the-movie-out-today-on-itunes-only/
 

CGW

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Messages
2,896
Format
Medium Format
From June 25th WSG:

"In March, Kodak's movie-film business, which had remained relatively steady
even as camera film sales plunged, suffered a new blow when three big movie
theater chains secured financing to convert 14,000 movie screens to digital
projection by 2013. The funding is expected to accelerate the digital distribution
of movies, giving Kodak less time to adapt to the long-anticipated decline in its
film cash cow."

A. Perez, in an interview.

FYI, this is a way bigger worry, PE:

http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/03/freakonomics-the-movie-out-today-on-itunes-only/
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom