It really depends. When I visited Florida regularly I shot a lot in the Fakahatchee Strand and in the Big Cypress. The horizon there was very close, short lenses were very useful. In situations with a distant horizon, short lenses give images that are all foreground.
Dan,Check your camera's setup, the upper left corner is much softer than the lower right. Could be motion blur due to wind.
Dan,
if Ian is right and he usually is, the 105mm f3.5 Tessar probably isn't up to coverage into the corners especially at wide apertures. Looks to be a little vignetting in the upper corners also. Maybe the front rise and fall setting is not dead-on either? Don't know for sure, but it would not be a lens I would use for 6X12. It does a fine job on my Super Ikonta C and I have no complaints about its performance. Even if it's a front element focusing lens.
Thanks Ian! I haven't played around with a 135mm Tessar on 4x5/5x4 but have on 9x12cm. I found that f16/f18 for the 9x12cm to be good for general shooting like scenic shots and such. f8 and wider works fine for near-center portraits. For 4x5/5x4 I'll stick with either my little Fuji 135mm or 135mm Symmar-S. No coverage problem with either. If I were wjlapier and wanted a 135mm for 6x12cm on a Speed Graphic I'd lean toward the little Fuji since it's very small, light weight, sharp with more than enough coverage. Oh, and did I mention the Fuji is dirt cheap right now too. I think he should look into the older Super Angulon lenses since it seems the Japanese are unloading much of their medium and large format equipment on the big auction site right now. I personally don't have a 6x12cm or 6x17cm back, but if I did I would use my 75mm Schneider Super Angulon for it or maybe my 100mm Widefield Ektar. The older Schneider Angulons run fairly cheap now. JohnWThe faster the Tessar the poorer the coverage, 105mm lenses and their coverage it's a discussion Dan and I have had before. A 105mm Tessar type design will illuminate a 5x4 focus screen at Infinity right to the corners but coverage is the useable s area where the lens is producing a sharp image.
I know from experience that a 135mm f4.5 Tessar on a 5x4 camera needs to be used at f22 to ensure edge and corner sharpness, at f16 sharpness is only jut acceptable and the edges have a touch of softness,
Ian
Very nice and I really like the first shot.Here's the 90mm f8 chrome Super Angulon full 4x5
Southwest Colorado 1992 by Nokton48, on Flickr
Garden of the Gods 1 by Nokton48, on Flickr
I shoot 6x12. a 90mm angulon has too much vignetting, a 90mm super angulon however is fine. as I love wide angles, so I also have a 47mm super angulon in a cambo 470 wide. that's fantastic. full coverage and no problem.
My non super 90mm angulon is soft on the corners and other places as well. The super 90mm is sharp as a pin.
Thanks, never heard of razzledog, his Polaroid conversion is much neater than mine.I dont mind mines aberration of my f6.8 for somethings.Your late countryman Dean Jones of Razzledog Polaroid conversion fame discovered that issue with the inconsistent quality of early silver barrelled 90mm Angulon lenses was due to variations of the Compur #0 shutters tube length. He corrected a few lenses that were soft by machining the shutter casings to the correct tube length. With brass Cooke portrait lenses soft focus is achieved by increasing the separation of the front cell from the rear element. A few months before he died Dean was asking people to measure their 90mm Angulons accurately to see how much variation there was.
It's quite common to have spacers on Wide angle lenses to optimise performance, there's two between the front cells and shutter on my 90mm f6.8 Grandagon N
My first 90mm Angulon wasn't sharp and I tried two more which were similar but my current one is fine, by SN 5,000,000 Schneider had eliminated the problem.
Ian
Very nice and I really like the first shot.
it is an early one, 2,100,000.I'm surprised you get vignetting with a 90mm Angulon, I use one for around 12 years with my light weight 5x4 kit and get no vignetting, however you do need care to keep inside the image circle. My main 90mm is however an f6.8 Grandagon N, and I have a 90mm f5.6 Super Angulon that was bought for my 617 camera.
Ian
it is an early one, 2,100,000.
calais harbour
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?