shoot delta100 at 25 ISO and soup in solvent developer to keep the ISO the same & process in two batches
you should not have switched to a rotary tank compromises edge effect and grain - some say...
keep shooting panf or buy larger fridge
Huh?
I'm done with experimenting... Didn't I say this? Lol
You have already tried 5222 in your rotary processor?
JUST so we can get this back on topic . . . . .
I would like to see bulk film for re-rolling in 126 Instamatic cartridges - basically, non-perforated 35mm film
Doesn't that need backing paper like 127 and 110?
Last year ilford cut 127 (46mm) in bulk and it's great, but the backing paper is running out, any chance this year there will be a backing paper run??
Yes it does; but, if you already have the cartridges to re-roll you should have the backing paper for them too.
not perforated 35mm is the basic ingredient for 126, and 828. Unperforated 16mm would be ideal for 110.
I wonder if the process allows winding rolls while bypassing the perforator.
I am not sure if they sold any of the uncut 120 backing paper last time. Cutting it down may work, but I believe that the edges get treated to make them conform to the spool, so just re-slitting 120 paper may not be sufficient unless the camera is loaded and unloaded in the dark. I understand that if Ilford had any 126 and 110 filling equipment it is long gone. Can't remember ever seeing 126 or 110 Ilford film in the stores here in canada
Hello Noel,
I have been down the recycled 120 backing paper road too, but found that the edges of the paper became fraid after three or so cycles of reuse; also the adhesive tape affixing "top" and "tail" to the film emulsion tends to wear the paper thin over the area of contact as each cycle removes a finite layer of paper during the "peeling off" process - but it works as you correctly describe; the 120 backing paper from Ilford is a more elegant albeit expensive option; when I know that I will be developing my 220 film soon after exposure, I sometimes dispense with the "tails" and load the film directly from the camera magazine into the tank (in darkness of course); the elimination of the paper "tails" effectively halves the paper costs; the elimination of the paper "tops" is also possible if you want to load your magazines in darkness but does waste a length of emulsion over the length of the missing paper "top" - and you might end up with a film length that is too long for your developing tank spiral. However each to his own tailor made method.
I have never had a problem with 120 film being scratched by the pressure plate; on well maintained Hasselblad magazines, the film emulsion is always in very light contact with the pressure plate except at the upper and lower extremities of the frame where it is lightly pressed between pressure plate and rollers and during the actual transport cycle when the rollers on the emulsion side should rotate making scratching very unlikely.
Best wishes,
Richard Hughes.
Hi Stone
The inconvenience rather depends on the camera and style of shooting.
For the RB67 I only have 3 backs and four motor inserts 80 frames with 220 before I need to find shade and reload.
Five minutes shooting more than five minutes reloading.
The RB is not a ULF Double dark slide cam you can use it like a DSLR.
The C330 stops at 20, I don't take hand of the winder.
Noel
HiRichardHello Noel,
I have been down the recycled 120 backing paper road too, but found that the edges of the paper became fraid after three or so cycles of reuse; also the adhesive tape affixing "top" and "tail" to the film emulsion tends to wear the paper thin over the area of contact as each cycle removes a finite layer of paper during the "peeling off" process - but it works as you correctly describe;
Richard Hughes.
HiRichard
Thanks for kind and useful response.
My plastic bag for 120 backing paper is a large bin bag, it gets topped up regular.
So I'd not need to reuse more than once.
All I need is pressure sensitive tape a sharpie and a jig to assemble lead and trail paper in dark. So
i) would Ilford supply 100 foot of 61mm in polybag and card box
ii) and how many people will order/pay
Ilford may not be happy... how many 100 rolls would we need?
Best
Noel
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?