180mm Rod/SK/ Fuji copal 1 lenses performance

Contemplation - Rome

A
Contemplation - Rome

  • 2
  • 0
  • 56
Permitted nature

D
Permitted nature

  • 4
  • 0
  • 42
*

A
*

  • 3
  • 0
  • 94
Bald Zombie

A
Bald Zombie

  • 3
  • 0
  • 107

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
200,433
Messages
2,808,051
Members
100,255
Latest member
Jagtar
Recent bookmarks
1

Joe Kashi

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2018
Messages
32
Location
Alaska
Format
Large Format
Do you mean W S, and not NWS. I don't see NWS onebay but i see W S and CM versions as well as W, but not NWS.
You mean this one?
View attachment 387384


I was referring to the NW series. The NW versions are probably the most common of all.

However, Fujinon lens nomenclature is well-known to be inconsistent and confusing, The original W series had the writing on the inside of the lens barrel, on the retaining ring.


These were single-coated Plasmats, with an 80 degree image circle. Later development led to the NW series, of which multiple iterations and updates were all termed NW or NWS, inconsistently. These are identified by the lens information being “written” around the outside of the barrel. These are multicoated lenses and often had all six elements separated into different groups. The angle of coverage was usually about 76 degrees. NWS was sometimes used to designate that the lens was in shutter rather than barrel. I may have used the term too loosely in my prior response.


The CM-W series is the last of the Fujinon wide-angle plasmat series. The changes are usually not significant optically. I have W, NW, and CM-W series Fujinon lenses and, except for slightly different coverage angles, can discern little difference in practical work.

The lens that you show on the Rittreck board is an early series W, single-coated but a very good lens that should cover about 300mm or so.

All are modern, coated lenses, designed with computer assistance, and made to professional standards. Of the earlier W series, the somewhat wider angle of coverage allows lenses as short as 135mm to be used on 5x7, with limited movement.


This is probably the best overall listing of large format Fujinon lenses:


http://www.subclub.org/fujinon/byfl.htm
 

Joe Kashi

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2018
Messages
32
Location
Alaska
Format
Large Format
Thanks Joe. Do you have the CM version or just W (of fujinon)?
Didn't know about Ektar being good for macro. The other lenses i mentioned are also good for macro? (As i understand they were not designed for that)

As a clarification, Ektar was a general brand name used by Kodak to designate their higher-tier lenses. It does not designate any specific type or design of lens. To my knowledge, the only post-WW II shutter-mounted Ektar widely sold and intended for general purpose work was the 203/7.7
 
OP
OP
Allthink

Allthink

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2024
Messages
45
Location
Israel
Format
35mm
I only have the two 180mm lenses that I mention. 180mm is not very common. These two just came on my way.
I think all 180mm lenses with the same coverage will perform more or less the same. The variation between individual examples will likely be more. The Apo-Rodagon 1:4.8 f=180mm is an enlarger lens. Less coverage. And as mentioned previously in this thread enlarger lenses will do a better job with still live.


View attachment 387399
Image0093.jpg

Hello Gary. Meanwhile i was experimenting with some lenses, bought Mamiya KL 127mm lens and used it for product and for macro(with technical camera cambo actus) and also bought 180mm soft focus from mamiya to try. ALso fuji ex75mm enlaging les(which behaved strange in my test - on open apertures one portion of the image(i think it was bottom) was soft but 3 stops closed down and everything very sharp, even with 2-3x enlargments).

Previously you mentioned that apo rodagon 180mm will outperform apo-sironar s.
I'm currently considering to add 150-180mm lens. Consider trying Mamiya rz 57 150mm KL.
I saw Sinar Sinaron S 180mm F5.6 MC lens. Do you think Apo rodagon 180mm enlarging is still better for still life(shooting products+macro sometimes) than this Sinaron S 180mm? (As i understand it's same as Apo-Sironar-N.
Thanks
 
OP
OP
Allthink

Allthink

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2024
Messages
45
Location
Israel
Format
35mm
The Schneider Kreuznach Apo Symmar MC 180mm f/5.6 is the newest design compared to the Sironar-N and should theoretically be better for general photography - which they were designed for.

But you would be hard pressed to see the difference in real life.

Will Schneider Kreuznach Apo Symmar MC 180mm f/5.6 you mentioned be better than Sinar Sinaron S 180mm F5.6 MC?
 

gary mulder

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
343
Format
4x5 Format
I saw Sinar Sinaron S 180mm F5.6 MC lens. Do you think Apo rodagon 180mm enlarging is still better for still life(shooting products+macro sometimes) than this Sinaron S 180mm? (As i understand it's same as Apo-Sironar-N.

The Apo-Sironar-N is not the same als the Apo-Sironar-S. Here is a picture for comparison. Left, Apo-Sironar-S 1:5.6 180mm. Middle Apo-Rodagon 1:4.8 180mm = Right, Sinaron digital 1:4.8 180mm. ( I don’t have a Apo-Sironar-N 180mm )
IMG_0438.jpg
 
OP
OP
Allthink

Allthink

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2024
Messages
45
Location
Israel
Format
35mm
The Apo-Sironar-N is not the same als the Apo-Sironar-S. Here is a picture for comparison. Left, Apo-Sironar-S 1:5.6 180mm. Middle Apo-Rodagon 1:4.8 180mm = Right, Sinaron digital 1:4.8 180mm. ( I don’t have a Apo-Sironar-N 180mm )
View attachment 409837

How Sinaron digital 180mm and apo-rodabon 180mm compare? Does the new version is better? I wonder what mount it has. I do have an option for Leica thread on plates for cambo.
I didn't say Apo-Sironar-N is same as Apo-Sironar-S, but i did say (Sinar) Sinaron S as same as Apo-Sironar-N. Hence i asked if you know how this lens(Sinaron) compares to your Apo-Sironar-S and Apo-Rodagon (180mm)
Thanks Gary
 

John Wiegerink

Subscriber
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
3,804
Location
Lake Station, MI
Format
Multi Format
The OP wants a 180mm for closeup macro work! I'm surprised nobody here has mentioned the Fujinon 180mm f9 A lens in Copal shutter. I wouldn't try shooting small live critters with it, but it works fine for closeup still lives. Yes, the f9 max aperture is dim for focusing, but I blast my subject with plenty of light just for focusing and then resort to lighting for the shot itself. Super sharp lens for sure. Just a thought, but and may not be what he's looking for, but I love mine.
 

abruzzi

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2018
Messages
3,151
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
Large Format
The OP wants a 180mm for closeup macro work! I'm surprised nobody here has mentioned the Fujinon 180mm f9 A lens in Copal shutter. I wouldn't try shooting small live critters with it, but it works fine for closeup still lives. Yes, the f9 max aperture is dim for focusing, but I blast my subject with plenty of light just for focusing and then resort to lighting for the shot itself. Super sharp lens for sure. Just a thought, but and may not be what he's looking for, but I love mine.

I've never used it for macro but it is the default lens on my light weight 4x5 setup. At macro distance I'm sure it would cover a lot more.

Nikkor also made a few macro lenses, but not a 180 as far as I know. But there is a 120 and a 210
 

John Wiegerink

Subscriber
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
3,804
Location
Lake Station, MI
Format
Multi Format
I've never used it for macro but it is the default lens on my light weight 4x5 setup. At macro distance I'm sure it would cover a lot more.

Nikkor also made a few macro lenses, but not a 180 as far as I know. But there is a 120 and a 210
Someday I might just try it on my 8X10 view camera to see how it works for macro/closeup work coverage wise.
 

Steve Goldstein

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 8, 2007
Messages
1,787
Location
Northeastern US
Format
Multi Format
Nobody has yet mentioned the 180mm f/5.6 Apo Macro Sironar. It’s not the most common or least expensive lens, but it does exactly what the OP wants. It requires 67mm filters. I use mine when doing macro work at home, but in the field I carry a 180mm Fujinon-A.
 

abruzzi

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2018
Messages
3,151
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
Large Format
Someday I might just try it on my 8X10 view camera to see how it works for macro/closeup work coverage wise.

well, it says a 252mm image circle at infinity (and ƒ22), so the image circle should double at 1:1 since its is double the distance from the film. Now 1:1 doesn't feel very macro on 8x10 like it does on 35mm, but anything larger is going to get a larger image circle.

(am I right? I figuring the "math" by supposition, not with a formula and a calculator.)
 

John Wiegerink

Subscriber
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
3,804
Location
Lake Station, MI
Format
Multi Format
well, it says a 252mm image circle at infinity (and ƒ22), so the image circle should double at 1:1 since its is double the distance from the film. Now 1:1 doesn't feel very macro on 8x10 like it does on 35mm, but anything larger is going to get a larger image circle.

(am I right? I figuring the "math" by supposition, not with a formula and a calculator.)
Sounds pretty right to me. I think that's why Edward Westons "Pepper" looks so nice is that you fill the frame of an 8X10 and then contact print it and you got WOW.
 

mrosenlof

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
625
Location
Colorado
Format
Multi Format
I have a 180mm f/5.6 Nikkor (-W, I think, it's a 'normal' coverage plasmat). I've only used it for general photography and it's very nice for that. Most macro lenses are optimized for copying flat work, when you photograph three dimensional objects things get less predictable, and less applicable to flat fields. A general purpose 180 is a lot of coverage, on 4x5.
 
OP
OP
Allthink

Allthink

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2024
Messages
45
Location
Israel
Format
35mm
The Apo-Sironar-N is not the same als the Apo-Sironar-S. Here is a picture for comparison. Left, Apo-Sironar-S 1:5.6 180mm. Middle Apo-Rodagon 1:4.8 180mm = Right, Sinaron digital 1:4.8 180mm. ( I don’t have a Apo-Sironar-N 180mm )
View attachment 409837

Hey Gary, i'm interested to hear your thoughts on what i wrote you in reply above. Thank you
 
OP
OP
Allthink

Allthink

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2024
Messages
45
Location
Israel
Format
35mm
Nobody has yet mentioned the 180mm f/5.6 Apo Macro Sironar. It’s not the most common or least expensive lens, but it does exactly what the OP wants. It requires 67mm filters. I use mine when doing macro work at home, but in the field I carry a 180mm Fujinon-A.

Hi Steve. Actually, this lens is in my cart. I see it sells for ~1000$. Interesting how it compares to what Gary mentioned(Apo-Rodagon 1:4.8 180mm , Sinaron digital 1:4.8 180mm) or 2 lenses i mentioned(Mamiya rz67 150/180mm KL and Sinar sinaron S 180mm)
 

gary mulder

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
343
Format
4x5 Format
I'm not very focused on maximum sharpness. There is objectively no difference to be found between the Apo-Rodagon and the Sinaron digital. They both have a 58mm threaded mount. The cells do not fit in a copal shutter.
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
14,546
Format
8x10 Format
Well, since this thread is still ongoing, I should chime in again a little more specifically. Probably the very best 180 for macro and near macro work (but superb clear out to infinity as well, in terms of versatility) would be the Fuji A-series 180/9. Very compact and better corrected than general purpose plasmats. Ample coverage for 5x7 film at infinity, more than most 180 lenses, obviously even more abundant coverage on 4x5 close-up. Generally comes in a no.0 Copal shutter, and is "EBC" multi-coated except in rare early examples with inside lettering. Extreme sharpness. I use a step-up ring on mine to accept 52mm filters. Used it yesterday in dim light; no problem.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom